Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy 3 Users in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine topic #113092
View in linear mode

Subject: "All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results" Previous topic | Next topic
bzossJan-31-05 02:16 PM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113092, "All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"


          

For quite some time here I have seen many people come out and say that they are going to break the 200whp with all motor, bla, bla. For the most part they are laughed at and told turbo or juice it up. Well, I am here to say that you guys are right. Look at my mod list, which is still lacking. I have done EVERYTHING short of the juice or turbo. I have to say that I would have loved to get more out of the car given that I poored so much money, time, and effort into it. But the facts are, our cars just don't make power all motor. We need the forced induction to make power.
So, here they are, the dyno results. Unfortunately, I can't upload the picture for some reason right now, but anyhow.

126 ft-lbs of torque was max torque
135 whp was max horsepower

These numbers are extremely disapointing. Especially considering that before the rebuild, I was making about 20 hp less than I am now. And before I tuned the car on the dyno, I was making just as much as before. But once I tuned the fuel, etc. I gained the 20 hp that I have more than before now.

This is more or less to give all those all motors heads some down to earth advice. If you want to make a lot of power, turbo. That is the most cost effective way to make big power. If you add up the cost to all those parts I bought, they way more than pay for the cost of a turbo upgrade.

I am going to try and get the dyno page to post shortly. Till then, maybe you all have some tuning comments for me to help me get a bit more out of the beast. And don't worry, the juice is coming.. ...

Oh, and she detonates like a screemin' whore. I have to get some retard control on her soon.

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Replies to this topic
RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, Collente, Jan-31-05 02:25 PM, #1
RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, CarbonFiberRST, Feb-01-05 04:46 AM, #5
      RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, cougar694u, Feb-01-05 08:48 AM, #6
           RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, Collente, Feb-01-05 02:34 PM, #7
RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, 420a2ner, Jan-31-05 02:25 PM, #2
RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, TeamAvenger, Jan-31-05 03:05 PM, #3
RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, TeamMichael_97RS, Jan-31-05 04:58 PM, #4
RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, bzoss, Feb-01-05 06:00 PM, #8
      RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, bzoss, Feb-01-05 06:05 PM, #9
           RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, TeamDR1665, Feb-01-05 06:35 PM, #10
           RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, EclipsedChef, Feb-01-05 07:17 PM, #11
                RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, Talontaxi, Feb-01-05 07:44 PM, #12
           RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, TeamMichael_97RS, Feb-02-05 06:44 AM, #13
                RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, bzoss, Feb-02-05 02:08 PM, #14
                RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, reliant_turbo, Feb-02-05 04:44 PM, #15
                     RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, bzoss, Feb-03-05 02:19 PM, #16
                          RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, TeamMichael_97RS, Feb-03-05 03:58 PM, #17
                               RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, cougar694u, Feb-04-05 08:23 AM, #18
                                    RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, bzoss, Feb-04-05 02:38 PM, #19
                                         RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, TeamDR1665, Feb-04-05 03:20 PM, #20
                                              RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, bzoss, Feb-05-05 02:01 PM, #21
                                                   RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, cougar694u, Feb-07-05 03:03 AM, #22
                                                        RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, bzoss, Feb-07-05 03:40 AM, #23
                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, TeamMichael_97RS, Feb-07-05 05:16 AM, #24
                RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- CEL Codes, bzoss, Feb-07-05 08:52 AM, #25
                     RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- CEL Codes, TeamMichael_97RS, Feb-07-05 09:48 AM, #26
                          RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- CEL Codes, bzoss, Feb-08-05 07:34 AM, #27
                               RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- CEL Codes, bzoss, Feb-08-05 04:10 PM, #28
                               RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- CEL Codes, TeamAvenger, Feb-09-05 11:05 AM, #30
                                    RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- CEL Codes, bzoss, Feb-10-05 07:27 AM, #31
RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, Ryan_Hes, Feb-09-05 06:47 AM, #29
RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, TeamMetalJim, Feb-10-05 02:30 PM, #32
      RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, bzoss, Feb-10-05 07:31 PM, #33
           RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New Injectors in!, bzoss, Feb-13-05 12:44 PM, #34
                RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New Injectors in!, eclipsekaiser, Feb-13-05 05:48 PM, #35
                     RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New Injectors in!, bzoss, Feb-14-05 01:04 AM, #36
                          RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New Injectors in!, TeamMichael_97RS, Feb-14-05 06:53 AM, #37
                               RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New Injectors in!, Ducking_Fumbass, Feb-15-05 12:43 AM, #38
                                    RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New Injectors in!, 97xtc, Feb-15-05 04:32 PM, #39
                                         RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New Injectors in!, TalonSpeed, Feb-16-05 06:36 AM, #40
                                              RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, bzoss, Feb-17-05 04:42 AM, #41
                                                   RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, TeamMichael_97RS, Feb-17-05 06:55 AM, #42
                                                        RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, TalonSpeed, Feb-17-05 01:22 PM, #43
                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, bzoss, Feb-19-05 06:30 AM, #44
                                                                  RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, bzoss, Feb-19-05 06:33 AM, #45
                                                                       RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, TalonSpeed, Feb-19-05 10:53 AM, #46
                                                                            RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, TeamMetalJim, Feb-20-05 01:33 PM, #47
                                                                                 RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, bzoss, Feb-21-05 08:38 AM, #48
                                                                                      RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results, TalonSpeed, Feb-21-05 04:14 PM, #49
                                                                                           RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, bzoss, Feb-22-05 05:11 AM, #50
                                                                                                RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, TalonSpeed, Feb-23-05 06:05 AM, #51
                                                                                                     RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, bzoss, Feb-23-05 06:56 AM, #52
                                                                                                          RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, Blizare, Feb-23-05 02:39 PM, #53
                                                                                                               RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, bzoss, Feb-24-05 04:42 AM, #54
                                                                                                                    RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, TeamXtremeRS, Mar-04-05 07:10 PM, #55
                                                                                                                         RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, bzoss, Mar-06-05 05:35 AM, #56
                                                                                                                              RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, TeamMichael_97RS, Mar-07-05 05:34 PM, #57
                                                                                                                                   RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, bzoss, Mar-08-05 09:37 AM, #58
                                                                                                                                        RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, kain_99gs, Mar-20-05 03:41 PM, #59
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, TeamAvenger, Mar-20-05 05:00 PM, #60
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, bzoss, Mar-22-05 09:14 AM, #61
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, DegreE, Mar-22-05 09:17 AM, #62
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, Initial DSM, Mar-22-05 01:44 PM, #63
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, bzoss, Mar-23-05 11:26 AM, #64
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, Scandelous, Apr-07-05 02:07 PM, #65
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, Initial DSM, Apr-07-05 05:42 PM, #66
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, TeamMichael_97RS, Apr-08-05 05:44 AM, #67
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, Initial DSM, Apr-08-05 07:28 PM, #68
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, TeamDR1665, Apr-13-05 10:12 AM, #69
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, bzoss, Apr-14-05 10:12 AM, #70
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, TeamDR1665, Apr-14-05 10:40 AM, #71
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, TeamMichael_97RS, Apr-15-05 01:19 PM, #72
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, Initial DSM, Apr-16-05 09:57 AM, #73
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, TeamMichael_97RS, Apr-16-05 12:48 PM, #74
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, Initial DSM, Apr-16-05 11:34 PM, #75
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, bzoss, Apr-17-05 11:10 AM, #76
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, SaberKhan, Apr-28-05 01:19 PM, #77
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, bzoss, Apr-28-05 04:14 PM, #78
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, SaberKhan, Apr-28-05 04:59 PM, #79
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, bzoss, Apr-29-05 04:19 AM, #80
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, bzoss, Apr-29-05 04:20 AM, #81
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, cougar694u, Apr-29-05 06:04 AM, #82
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, bzoss, Apr-29-05 09:36 AM, #85
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, TeamDR1665, Apr-29-05 08:20 AM, #83
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, bzoss, Apr-29-05 09:31 AM, #84
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, TeamDR1665, Apr-29-05 01:28 PM, #86
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, bzoss, Apr-30-05 02:58 AM, #87
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, TeamDR1665, May-01-05 07:18 PM, #88
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, RST95eclipse, May-10-05 04:41 AM, #89
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, TeamDR1665, May-10-05 05:55 AM, #91
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, cougar694u, May-10-05 07:34 AM, #92
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, TeamDR1665, May-10-05 08:53 AM, #93
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, cougar694u, May-10-05 10:58 AM, #94
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, SILVERNT, May-11-05 04:05 PM, #96
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, TeamDR1665, May-11-05 06:35 PM, #97
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, bzoss, May-10-05 05:31 AM, #90
                                                                                                                                             RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory, TeamMichael_97RS, May-10-05 11:08 AM, #95

CollenteJan-31-05 02:25 PM
Member since Sep 20th 2002
2447 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113093, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 0


          

Something isn't tuned right with your setup.
What do your 02 voltages look like? Bad 02 sensor? Have both of them hooked up? Is your timing correct? compression #'s?
With basic bolt-ons and cam gears compact car Mag made 175whp on the dyno.

Somethings not right.


Nick
97RS


THX KAPTAIN MYKE FOR HOSTING! www.kaptainmyke.com

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
CarbonFiberRSTFeb-01-05 04:46 AM
Donating 2GNT member
1368 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113094, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 1
Feb-01-05 04:48 AM by CarbonFiberRST

          

Originally posted by Collente
Something isn't tuned right with your setup. What do your 02 voltages look like? Bad 02 sensor? Have both of them hooked up? Is your timing correct? compression #'s? With basic bolt-ons and cam gears compact car Mag made 175whp on the dyno. Somethings not right. Nick 97RS THX KAPTAIN MYKE FOR HOSTING! www.kaptainmyke.com


Don't know if I am thinking of the same mag but I saw a mag about 3 years ago and their baseline was about 112 or 111.XX whp stock and they got it to 119.XX or 12X.XX or something like that with a header, catback, intake and i think it was pulleys(not sure about cam gears) i was new to the game when i saw the mag. 175 seems HIGH to me, but i r stupid.


Evo 8 - 12.3@113 circa 2009 (~330whp)
Now with BB Xona Rotor HTZ FP Red and ~450whp
2018 MSM Civic SI Ktuner TSP stage 1 w/ Honda hacked headunit.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
cougar694uFeb-01-05 08:48 AM
Donating 2GNT member
3381 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113095, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 5




          

Originally posted by CarbonFiberRST
Don't know if I am thinking of the same mag but I saw a mag about 3 years ago and their baseline was about 112 or 111.XX whp stock and they got it to 119.XX or 12X.XX or something like that with a header, catback, intake


You're right:

http://www.importtuner.com/tech/0204it_ppeclipse/

Import Tuner did it. With only a CAI, Header and exhaust, it pumped out 119hp and 122 ft/lb. With adjustable cam gears, they got 126 and 127 out of it.

I'm sure somethings wrong with your tuning. My guess is timing's off.

~Luke
Facebook
1969 Cougar - 11.91 - 380HP
2007 GSXR 750
1999 OZ - SOLD - 15.26 NA - 14.71 on 75 shot

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
CollenteFeb-01-05 02:34 PM
Member since Sep 20th 2002
2447 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113096, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 6


          

Originally posted by cougar694u
Originally posted by CarbonFiberRST Don't know if I am thinking of the same mag but I saw a mag about 3 years ago and their baseline was about 112 or 111.XX whp stock and they got it to 119.XX or 12X.XX or something like that with a header, catback, intake
You're right: http://www.importtuner.com/tech/0204it_ppeclipse/ Import Tuner did it. With only a CAI, Header and exhaust, it pumped out 119hp and 122 ft/lb. With adjustable cam gears, they got 126 and 127 out of it. I'm sure somethings wrong with your tuning. My guess is timing's off.


There ya go, i knew it was something with a 7 lol

Nick
97RS


THX KAPTAIN MYKE FOR HOSTING! www.kaptainmyke.com

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

420a2nerJan-31-05 02:25 PM
Member since Aug 23rd 2004
181 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113097, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 0




          

damn you should be making like 160+ with that shit. Maybe you need a different set of cams .

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
TeamAvengerJan-31-05 03:05 PM
Old School 2GNTer
2453 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113098, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 2
Jan-31-05 03:06 PM by Avenger



          

Sounds about right to me. Don't know why you got bigger injectors though. Probably wouldn't even max out the stockers. Though it's definitely not tuned to it's maximum potential. The cams are pretty mild as well. For NA you'd need something much more aggressive. What'd you set the cam gears to as well? There is NO WAY you should be detonating on 10.5:1 compression so there is something wrong right there (unless you're using 87 octane).

-"Easy Mac"
05 Mazda RX-8 (RR8 #88)
99 Eclipse RS 398whp & 372lb-ft

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

TeamMichael_97RSJan-31-05 04:58 PM
Donating 2GNT member
5866 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113099, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 0


          

Yeah there's something wrong with your set up. You are running premium gas right?

At 10.5:1 you shouldn't be detonation. Are you sure the physical timing is correct? Any check engine codes?

What air fuel ratio are you tuning to on the dyno?



Exile Racing Technologies: http://www.exileracing.com
Assasin of Joy

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
bzossFeb-01-05 06:00 PM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113100, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 4


          

That is what I can't figure out. I had the deck shaved, but I don't know exactly how much the machine shop took off... maybe a little more than I wanted... or the pistons could actually be the 12.5:1 instead of the 10.5:1 I ordered. From experience and what I have heard on this forum, Howell's rep is not so good with everybody... but that is a different thread. Anyhow, I am pretty sure that it is detonation.
I have to agree with the fuel injectors comment as well. I had to lean the crap out of my fuel mix to get it where I wanted it. I have it at -32% on the safc II controller. LOL...
But hey, it is right on the money now, also I am going to be running nitrous soon, so I will not have to worry about going lean when I juice 'er up.
I have the cams set at advance 2 degrees on the intake and retard 2 degrees on the exhaust. I would have played with them more, but when I did that last adjustment on them I gained a whole .4 Hp on the Dyno when I was tuning the fuel and cam gears, so I left them alone.

And for whoever said my cams are not agressive, they are a decently agressive cam. I would still like to drive this thing daily, LOL.


I was hoping for that number you were all putting out there, the magic 175whp. And I have to say that I am pretty damn dissapointed. I won't rule out the fact that I may not have everything tuned just perfect, but I will say that there is no way in hell I am going to get another 40whp from my shitty tuning job.
Before I tuned everything I was at like 116whp. I gained a solid 20whp from my tuning job. In some parts of the power curve I gained a total of about 27whp. So I think I did a good job tuning. The most I think I can pull out of her is MAYBE another 3-4whp... MAYBE, but I doubt it.

Anyhow, if any of you have any tips I am open for sudgestions.

I am getting a timing retard module to hook up to my ignition to hopefully get a few more whp, maybe break 140whp lol, and get rid of that damn knocking.

Thanks for the comments, keep 'em coming!

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
bzossFeb-01-05 06:05 PM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113101, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 8


          

Oh, I am tuning to about 13 for the fuel on the dyno, and yes, I have a CEL. For many things actually... my cars computer hates all these mods. Which brings me to a bitching point... No one out there makes after markey computers for the 98 and up GS... so I am stuck with this one which is probably robbing me of some power, and keeping my rev limit at 7200. With as wide as my power band is, I would like to be shifting around 7500-7700, but my damn limiter kicks in. That and I still cant go faster than 125mph, cuz my computer cuts my fuel out...

and I do run 93octane gas. all the time... shell or chevron only! (got stock in 'em)
Oh yea, everyone, only use chevron gas... it is the best ever... it makes your car go faster.... j/k

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
TeamDR1665Feb-01-05 06:35 PM
Donating 2GNT member
14692 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113102, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 9


          

Originally posted by bzoss
Which brings me to a bitching point... No one out there makes after markey computers for the 98 and up GS...

You need to do some research on the the Megasquirt w/ spark control. You determine rev limits and fuel cut. You have a decent set up, and you could really afford to play around with you AF with some more accuracy imo. A SAFC isn't going to cut it. I would suggest resetting the cams to 0* each, installing MSnS w/ wbO2, and tune your AFR for max power across the board. Then go to the dyno and spend your time tweaking the cams. That's what I would do anyways.

As for figuring out actual compression ratio, why not post some comp test numbers?

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
EclipsedChefFeb-01-05 07:17 PM
Old School 2GNTer
987 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113103, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 10


          

i wouldnt have the exhaust cam set at -2, i found that with my decked head the closer you are to 0 the better the car runs. My car would bog and hesitate like crazy when my exhaust cam was off.


Aem Cold Air AFX 55mm TB
Fidanza Cam Gears NGK Wires
AFX UDP Greddy Header
Gutted Cat Greddy Evo Catback
Energy Suspension MMI Eibach Sportlines
Tokico Blues...always more to come

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
TalontaxiFeb-01-05 07:44 PM
Member since Jul 14th 2004
201 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113104, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 11


          

What brand of dyno did you use? I've seen a celica gt-s tested on three different dynos and make 171 whp on one, 152 on another and 136 on another(not in that particular order) The temps and conditions for each run where all consistent. Run on a different dyno and see what you come up with. Just an idea.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
TeamMichael_97RSFeb-02-05 06:44 AM
Donating 2GNT member
5866 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113105, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 9


          

What CEL's do you have, this can help a lot in helping diagnos your problem.

You can also go a little leaner on your A:F, it's NA not turbo.

My first suggestion it to tear down the timing and retime your engine, re-index the cams from the block being decked/head being milled. Make sure she's dead on and go from there.



Exile Racing Technologies: http://www.exileracing.com
Assasin of Joy

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
bzossFeb-02-05 02:08 PM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113106, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 13


          

I did a comp test a bit ago for another reason than tuning, however, the numbers were pretty damn high. My pressure gage only went to 300psi, and when the needle bounced up to nearly 300psi I quit because I didn't want to break the gage... LOL. I am confident that I can get over the 300psi the gage will read to.

As for tuning the cams and such. The car runs great where they are set at. Like I said I have already tuned this stuff on the dyno, and get very positive results. I got an average of 23hp gain across the board when I tuned 'er on the dyno.


As for the GT-S making 171whp, I doubt it, seriously seeing as how they only put out 180 at the crank. That 136 sounds more realistic, or maybe the 140whp one. In any case, I don't know the dyno brand, and I can't hop around, there are not that many dyno's around here, plus dyno time is expensive. The cost of the dyno just to save some pride isn't really worth it to me. I will just admit the numbers and juice 'er up.

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
reliant_turboFeb-02-05 04:44 PM
Member since Jul 28th 2003
13 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113107, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 14


          

300 psi on a compression test????? how are you doing the test. that seems crazy high.

If you are leaning out the fuel 32% with the SAFC, you are advancing the timing and if i remember reading correctly on one of the turbo guys setup, with the map not at a certain voltage, the car goes back into closed loop. i could be wrong.

with that crazy high compression, the safc possibly making it lean (closed loop) and the timing being advanced (safc again) it could very well be detonation. you need to see how much they took of the head and double check your piston part numbers.

who ported your head. with improper head porting, it can really mess up a head and not actually help make power until a RPM band that you wont be operating in. if it was just a slight cleanup and removing rough surfaces and not a drastic reshaping then you should be ok. porting is an art and a skill that must be learned properly. not any joe schmoe can do it right.

sounds like you need to do some double checking of what you actually have and then look into a megasquirt to control everything.

Brian

Brian Bucar

www.squirrelpf.com - Dedicated to making cars perform.

Racing is an addiction that can only be cured by poverty.

88 Plymouth Reliant K 2.5L Intercooled Turbo - 5-Speed
89 Dodge Aries K 2.5L N/A Beater
88 Plymouth Reliant V6 Project

Currently helping ForceFed420A finish his custom 97 Eclipse Megasquirt Turbo project.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
bzossFeb-03-05 02:19 PM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113108, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 15


          

300 psi is not uncommon on high compression engines

I am fairly certain that I got the 10.5:1, however, I will probably never know how much the head was decked. As for the port and polish, the person that did it attended a school in cali, and from other work I have seen does a great job, hence, I picked them to do the porting. So as far as that goes, i think that it was done right. I have a timing retard module that came in today that I am going to install to try and get rid of that damn detonation, hopefully it works, and maybe I can scam a few more ponies out of it. But to make a long story short, these numbers are about as good as I or anyone else is going to get with all motor from this engine. If we want power, juice it or turbo it.
I will post the new numbers once I juice er up, I am probably going to hit the 210-220 whp mark with the juice. I am not gunna do more than a 75 shot.
anyhow, thanks for on the input, keep it coming.

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
TeamMichael_97RSFeb-03-05 03:58 PM
Donating 2GNT member
5866 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113109, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 16
Feb-03-05 04:06 PM by Michael_97RS

          

Originally posted by bzoss
But to make a long story short, these numbers are about as good as I or anyone else is going to get with all motor from this engine.


No, with lower compression I put down almost 146 at the wheel with tuning needing to be done.

Daniel put down almost 160 at the wheels with a little mor ethan 10.5:1 comression.

If your engine is 10.5:1 or a little more I still think there's soemthing off a little causing the detonation. What is tripping your check engine light?

Head over to neons.org and look around there are guys there who have actually done all motor, yes their cars are lighter. But they have actually put good numbers down with all motor.



Exile Racing Technologies: http://www.exileracing.com
Assasin of Joy

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
cougar694uFeb-04-05 08:23 AM
Donating 2GNT member
3381 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113110, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 17




          

Originally posted by bzoss
I am probably going to hit the 210-220 whp mark with the juice. I am not gunna do more than a 75 shot.


The term 75 shot comes from 75hp. If you dyno'd at 135 and add a 75 shot, you're only gonna gain about 60-65 at the wheels from it.

My guess, if you dyno'd right now with a 75 shot, you'll hit 198~199.

Originally posted by Michael_97RS
knows what he's sayin.


I personally think you should get at least another 20hp out of your car.

Tune it, find the missing horses, get to around 150, then throw the 75 shot on there and you'll be around that ~215 mark.

~Luke
Facebook
1969 Cougar - 11.91 - 380HP
2007 GSXR 750
1999 OZ - SOLD - 15.26 NA - 14.71 on 75 shot

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
bzossFeb-04-05 02:38 PM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113111, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 18


          

I realize that.... just slappin' numbers around...
I will keep the tuning effort going. The next big thing for me now is hooking up my timing retard module and playing with the timing.

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                        
TeamDR1665Feb-04-05 03:20 PM
Donating 2GNT member
14692 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113112, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 19


          

Originally posted by bzoss
I realize that.... just slappin' numbers around... I will keep the tuning effort going. The next big thing for me now is hooking up my timing retard module and playing with the timing.


Never give up the fight! But if you do, be sure you gave it your all and document your findings for the rest of the all motor hopefuls.

BTW, PM sent regarding your outrageously long sig...

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
bzossFeb-05-05 02:01 PM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113113, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 20


          

ok, got the Timing Retard Controller hooked up, and as of now I am retarding the timing about 5 degrees. I pulled it back that much because that is what it took to get rid of the majority of the knock. Unfortunately I can feel a significant loss of power. Not only that, but the fuel is way rich again. Did the fuel richen up due to me retarding the timing? And if so, am I going to be fighting a never ending battle... leaning the fuel, then having to retard the timing, then leaning out again due to the retarding of the timing, and so on?
Maybe I should just swap the standard size injectors back in there...
any sudgestions??

Thanks for the help!!

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                
cougar694uFeb-07-05 03:03 AM
Donating 2GNT member
3381 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113114, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 21




          

Originally posted by bzoss
...I am retarding the timing about 5 degrees...I can feel a significant loss of power

You will lose power by pulling timing.


Originally posted by bzoss
Not only that, but the fuel is way rich again. Did the fuel richen up due to me retarding the timing? And if so, am I going to be fighting a never ending battle...

Yes.


Originally posted by bzoss
am I going to be fighting a never ending battle...

Aren't we all? J/K. Once you get it tuned right, you'll be good...

~Luke
Facebook
1969 Cougar - 11.91 - 380HP
2007 GSXR 750
1999 OZ - SOLD - 15.26 NA - 14.71 on 75 shot

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                    
bzossFeb-07-05 03:40 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113115, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 22


          

What do you think about swapping out the injectors for smaller ones? Would that make a significant difference? In my opinion, right now my biggest problem is getting the fuel right, it is way to rich, so swapping the injectors should get me there the easiest, right?

Keep the help coming, I really appreciate it.

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                        
TeamMichael_97RSFeb-07-05 05:16 AM
Donating 2GNT member
5866 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113116, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 23


          

Yes, drop the stock injectors back in and tune from there.

I still want to know what Check engine codes you are getting. The problem may lie there.



Exile Racing Technologies: http://www.exileracing.com
Assasin of Joy

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
bzossFeb-07-05 08:52 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113117, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- CEL Codes"
In response to Reply # 13


          

OK, Got the CEL codes read today,
here we go:

P1390
Octane Adjust Pin Out of Self Test Range

P0172
The PCM has determined that during testing, the fuel system for bank 1 was too rich. (Bank 1 identifies the location of cylinder 1, while bank 2 indentifies the cylinders on the opposite bank)

The person at auto zone looked up the codes in his book and said it was one of the following:
MAP Sensor, Oxygen Sensor, and/ or Ignition Misfire

Ok, so now I ask, WTF does the first code I put up there mean, and given that my air/fuel gage reads out normally, does that mean that my O2 sensor is ok?
Is the bad MAP possibly caused by the S-AFC II? I have driven on a backup map, and let me tell you, you will know what it is immediately, so I think that my MAP is ok.
That last one, ignition misfire has got me stumped however. I assume that is from the engine knock, causing it to throw that code.

So, given these check engine lights, what more advice can I get?

Thanks for the help, keep it coming.

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
TeamMichael_97RSFeb-07-05 09:48 AM
Donating 2GNT member
5866 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113118, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- CEL Codes"
In response to Reply # 25


          

The first one is the knock sensor is detecting knock.
The second one is an oxygen sensor detecting rich condition

First things first put your stock injectors back in. This should clear the rich condition and in retuning with the S-AFC you could get rid of the knock.

Also make sure your splices with the S-AFC are good and solid.



Exile Racing Technologies: http://www.exileracing.com
Assasin of Joy

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
bzossFeb-08-05 07:34 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113119, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- CEL Codes"
In response to Reply # 26


          

One thing I don't really understand, is how do the fuel injectors or the fact that there is too much fuel contribute the the knocking?
I understand it to be the richer the better in the case of preventing your car from knocking... just my assumption... I do agree that hopefully this solves my problem.
I do intend to change the fuel injectors however, I just need to find the time. Injectors are, unfortunately, not an easy task on our cars...

Would you say that 19lb. injectors would do the trick? or still too big?

Also, do you think that with the proper fuel injectors, I will be more apt to hit that 160whp mark? Concidering the knock and such will be gone...?

Thanks for the input, keep it coming!

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
bzossFeb-08-05 04:10 PM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113120, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- CEL Codes"
In response to Reply # 27


          

So what do you think the knocking is coming from if it isn't due to the fuel being too rich, or something to do with the fuel injectors?

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
TeamAvengerFeb-09-05 11:05 AM
Old School 2GNTer
2453 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113121, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- CEL Codes"
In response to Reply # 27




          

Originally posted by bzoss
One thing I don't really understand, is how do the fuel injectors or the fact that there is too much fuel contribute the the knocking? I understand it to be the richer the better in the case of preventing your car from knocking... just my assumption... I do agree that hopefully this solves my problem. I do intend to change the fuel injectors however, I just need to find the time. Injectors are, unfortunately, not an easy task on our cars... Would you say that 19lb. injectors would do the trick? or still too big? Also, do you think that with the proper fuel injectors, I will be more apt to hit that 160whp mark? Concidering the knock and such will be gone...? Thanks for the input, keep it coming!


Just put the stock injectors back in. I believe they are about 235cc/min injectors. You can cause knock from being too rich. But I'd still think that there is probably a mechanical timing issue that may be causing the knock. I don't think you'll be able to hit 160whp. Cams aren't aggressive enough to make it there. Just my opinion. If all the issues were corrected, I'd guesstimate in the mid to low 150s.

-"Easy Mac"
05 Mazda RX-8 (RR8 #88)
99 Eclipse RS 398whp & 372lb-ft

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
bzossFeb-10-05 07:27 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113122, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- CEL Codes"
In response to Reply # 30


          

I have the injectors on there way, 19lb'ers. They are the stock size, so that is going to deal with that running rich problem. I just hope that it also fixes the knock.

I have a Timing Retard Control module, and I can retard the timing to get rid of the knock. With the setup I have now, I have to retard it nearly 10 degrees to get rid of the knock.

When I replace the injectors, IF it still knocks, what things are there that I can do to adjust / reset the timing in order to correct the problem??

I am about 99% sure the cams are alligned correctly, so, other than that, how am I suppost to correct the malfunction in the timing?

Thanks for the help!!


BTW: Going to shoot the juice to 'er as soon as I get these little kinks out of the way, but I want to make sure she is in tip top shape before I abuse the crap out of her.

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Ryan_HesFeb-09-05 06:47 AM
Old School 2GNTer
3450 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113123, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 0


          

Originally posted by bzoss
For quite some time here I have seen many people come out and say that they are going to break the 200whp with all motor, bla, bla. For the most part they are laughed at and told turbo or juice it up. Well, I am here to say that you guys are right.


You already know what to do. You could have far over 200hp if the same amount of money was invested into turbocharging and not pointless NA mods. No offense, I mean - I used to drive an automatic N/A Eclipse....we all learn in time.

______________________________

Ryan
IRyanHester@Hotmail.com

'03 Mazda 6s

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
TeamMetalJimFeb-10-05 02:30 PM
Donating 2GNT member
2135 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113124, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 29




          

One of the problems that people have noticed is that when you lean the MAP signal out too much, the ECU will start to advance the timing. How much timing is it currently seeing? If you're seeing signifigantly more timing than what people normally see at WOT(around 17 degrees), then switching to the smaller injectors and flattening the MAP modifications may help the problem some. 10 degrees is alot to be pulling just to get rid of knock.

I'm really having a hard time swallowing the fact that you don't know what you're static compression ratio is. A good machine shop will tag the head with any milling information. That way if it ever comes back to the shop then they know how far out of stock it is. I'd call the shop and ask them if they have any records on the work. As far as it being 10.5 or 12.5 pistons, well thats troublesome too. Do you have the packaging that the pistons came with? There should have been some information about them in the box.


95 Eclipse RS : 5 speed
15.7 @ 87.9mph
Jeep TB writeup - http://www.dimensia.com:81/jimbo/JeepTBfor2gnt.html

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
bzossFeb-10-05 07:31 PM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113125, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 32


          

Concidering that I leaned the fuel out about 40% total, that could very well be the problem.
As far as how much the head was milled, I can contact the shop, but no markings were made, I also believe that the pistons are in fact 10.5:1.
I assume that the timing was probably advanced quite a bit due to the grossly oversized injectors. Hopefully with the injector change out, my problems will be solved. The new injectors should be here today, so I should be able to get them in sometime over the weekend.

I appreciate your help, I will post the results of the injector swap as soon as I get them in and a test drive out of the way.

Thanks again!

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
bzossFeb-13-05 12:44 PM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113126, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New Injectors in!"
In response to Reply # 33


          

got the 19lb. injectors in. Problem still persists...
what do I do???

I am extremely lost. I can't figure out how to get rid of this damn knocking. I know that I shouldn't be knocking, but I am still knocking.

Do you think that it could have something to do with the computer??

Here is one thing that I have been thinking of:
To get rid of the knocking, I retard the timing manually with my little TRC module. Now, when I do that, I lose lots of power, and get the rest of the downfalls of retarding timing.
So if the timing is what is messed up, and the timing is suppost to be where I retard it to, that doesn't make any since. Then the car would basically always run like crap if the timing were where it needed to be in order for the knocking to go away.
So, in that sence, does it me that it is something other than timing?
If so, what the heck could it be?

I really doubt that it is coming from detonation, due the compression not being quite high enough to be in any danger of detonation.
So, then maybe it is misfiring, but why, and how would I correct it?

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
eclipsekaiserFeb-13-05 05:48 PM
Old School 2GNTer
2375 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113127, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New Injectors in!"
In response to Reply # 34


          

I think others have told you this before, but double check your timing and cam gear related items. I don't think your problem is in the injectors as you swapped to a smaller set.

Or better yet, set everythign back to stock configuration and start from there.

-K-

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
bzossFeb-14-05 01:04 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113128, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New Injectors in!"
In response to Reply # 35


          

I have done that time, and time again, nothing works. Any other sudgestions?

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
TeamMichael_97RSFeb-14-05 06:53 AM
Donating 2GNT member
5866 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113129, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New Injectors in!"
In response to Reply # 36


          

Originally posted by bzoss
I have done that time, and time again, nothing works. Any other sudgestions?


You've pulled the crank pulley and checked your physical timing with all 3 marks?

Have you pulled your plugs to look at them? What gap are you running?

Other causes could be electrical, either wiring or sensors.



Exile Racing Technologies: http://www.exileracing.com
Assasin of Joy

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
Ducking_FumbassFeb-15-05 12:43 AM
Member since Aug 30th 2004
1147 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113130, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New Injectors in!"
In response to Reply # 37


          

I have had growing concerns about any kind of fuckering around with the exhaust cam timing. I keep finding myself liking the idea of messing around with a PCM timing reference less and less. Try setting that back to stock, and zero out the AFC. Start from scratch, basically.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
97xtcFeb-15-05 04:32 PM
Old School 2GNTer
353 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113131, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New Injectors in!"
In response to Reply # 38


          

Did you compensate for the marks being off on the AEM cam gears? Im willing to bet the port work on the head and intake are excessive. You said your intake runners are bored, That alone is too much on an na 420a. All they need is a little minor work and some polishing. Anything more then that on a setup like yours will cause you to loose velocity. Also I would say your combination of bigger cams and larger valves are making things worse on your setup, If you had a stroker crank I could see doing both. Bigger is not always better, having a setup that works together will give you higher gains.

ASE certified master auto technician

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
TalonSpeedFeb-16-05 06:36 AM
Member since Oct 15th 2002
446 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113132, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New Injectors in!"
In response to Reply # 39


          

I can tell u exactly whey I doubt a 420a will ever get 200whp in the eclipse platform. CAMS!!!! crane 18s and crower stage 3s will get u close but not close enough. Neons have reached the 200whp range already, but look at their cam options, they can get crane 22s and 24s!

i had a killer NA setup in my talon, I sold the car because I couldnt get it where I wanted to get it.

too mack good power the 420a needs big cams, head work, custom intake manifold, a nice header, and a custom ecu. With big cams, the stock ecu wont be able to hold the idle.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                        
bzossFeb-17-05 04:42 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113133, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 40


          

When you did your all motor rebuild what compression did you use? Was it similar to mine? And if so, did you have problems with detonation?


All the timing marks line up perfect. I checked it with the crank pulley off, etc. etc.

The cams timing marks are not PERFECTLY lined up, but due to them already being set a tuned degrees due to prior tuning that is why, but they are VERY close, so that cannot be the problem.

I thought maybe my plugs were getting too hot and causing pre-ignition detonation, but I swapped them for the coldest ones that eccell has to offer, and I still have the same problem.

I am going to start playing with the cam gears I think.
I will retard them both about 4 degrees and see how that does, and then do the opposite. Maybe I can learn a little something from how the car responds.

Last effort is going to be switching to race gas. See if it detonates on that.
If not, then my timing is in fact where it should be, and my problem is from detonation. Either from too high of compression, or something in the cylinder is getting hot enough to light the fuel under compression before the spark gets there.

Keep the input coming, but seriously, don't say check the timing anymore please, I have heard it one thousand times, and I have checked it a thousand times. IT IS DEAD NUTS ON.

I do enjoy all the support, so keep it coming!

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
TeamMichael_97RSFeb-17-05 06:55 AM
Donating 2GNT member
5866 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113134, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 41


          

Originally posted by bzoss
Keep the input coming, but seriously, don't say check the timing anymore please, I have heard it one thousand times, and I have checked it a thousand times. IT IS DEAD NUTS ON. I do enjoy all the support, so keep it coming!


Well depending on how the cam gears are adjusted will depend on if it's actually on. The big on is to get the exhaust cam dead on and tune with the intake cam.

Hav you datalogged your car to see what's she's doing when you are running? It could be a sensor throwing off the mix.

What spark plug gap are you running? Increases cylinder pressure be it from turbo or higher compression can blow out the spark causing problems. I notice you aren't running an ignition amp.



Exile Racing Technologies: http://www.exileracing.com
Assasin of Joy

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                
TalonSpeedFeb-17-05 01:22 PM
Member since Oct 15th 2002
446 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113135, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 42
Feb-17-05 01:23 PM by TalonSpeed

          

i dont think your motor is detonating at all. I think it just misfiring from too much fuel. Stock injectors will handle any NA setup currently out there for the motor.

Detonation is more like pinging or sometime it sounds like a rapid paintball gun fire. Misfire is sputtering and a severe loss of power.

First put in the stock injectors, set the afc at 0, and get some bigger cams. If u want anything above 170whp get crane 18s or crower stage 3.

My setup was:
Crane 16 w\springs, oversize valves, port work, head milled, I\H\E, afx ecu and pulley. The car was still slow. It was decently quick when i slapped a 75 shot on it though

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                    
bzossFeb-19-05 06:30 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113136, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 43


          

It sounds exactly like the detonation you described... the whole machine gun firing thing, not sluggish or sputtery at all. Sound like a rapid pinging, which is why I keep saying that it is detonation.

The spark plugs are brand new, just put them in like 50 miles ago. I do have an ignition amp. It is the Crane ignition. The recommended gap with that system is .045, and that is what I gapped the plugs to.

The plugs are all the coldest heat range possible. Everything in the block is brand new. I think that somehow, maybe I got 12.5:1 vice 10.5:1. Because I really don't think that my head was milled enough to raise my compression over the detonation threshold, and I can't figure any other reason that would cause my car to be detonating other than the high compression factor.

I am going to put a crap load of octane boost in her and see what that does, and of course keep playing with the cam timing, however, like I said. It is not sluggish or sputtery, it is the rattle can machine gun firing noise... detonation.

Keep the input coming, I do appreciate it. One thing I don't understand however is, how can motorcycles run like 13:1 on pump gas but I can't even run 11:1 in a car? I have heard other cars tuned to run high compression on pump gas, what is their secret?

Thanx guys!

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                        
bzossFeb-19-05 06:33 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113137, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 44


          

Oh, one more thing...

I replaced the injectors, and she still runs a little rich, and this is why I think it is...

I am knocking pretty bad at times, so the car richins my mixture to protect itself. So in turn I lean out my car, it detonates more, then richens back up, so effectively, I am fighting a never ending battle with the fuel mix until I can get the knocking to go away. Basically with the knocking, my car is going to make itself run rich.
So, I don't think that I should have put the stockers back in, in fact, I would say I wasted 160 dollars on them. Because I still have the same problem due to the detonation.

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                            
TalonSpeedFeb-19-05 10:53 AM
Member since Oct 15th 2002
446 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113138, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 45


          

you have too many piggy back systems. remove all piggy backs, safc, crane ignition, and any others. and see how it runs.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                
TeamMetalJimFeb-20-05 01:33 PM
Donating 2GNT member
2135 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113139, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 46




          

I hate to say it, but Cordell may have a point. As a last resort anyway you may have to start unpiggybacking the car. I don't think you have too many piggybacks, but you may have to start unhooking to rule them out. Don't do that yet though.

Someone suggested that the AEM gears need to be marked because they are incorrect. Have you done this? Its very important that you know exactly where 0 is on your exhaust cam especially, cause before anything - you want to set the exhaust cam to 0. The reason for this is the cam position sensor runs off the exhaust cam gear. Some poeople have had problems running with it at anything other than 0. But make sure the mark is correct before you do that even. So thats the first thing I would do.

The next thing I would do is play with the plug gap. Ok, so you're running at a recommended gap. Why don't you try changing it. I'd probably try running an incrementally smaller gap and see how it reacts. Thats an easy thing to do, and its free as well.

Another thing that you can do is tell us when its detonating. Is it only at WOT? Is it doing it at idle only? Does it start at a particular RPM and go all the way to redline? Does it only happen between a certain RPM range? That kind of stuff. All I've heard so far is that its detonating, but not the conditions.


95 Eclipse RS : 5 speed
15.7 @ 87.9mph
Jeep TB writeup - http://www.dimensia.com:81/jimbo/JeepTBfor2gnt.html

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                    
bzossFeb-21-05 08:38 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113140, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 47


          

Ok, about the un-piggybacking part...
I had the S-AFC in before the rebuild, and it worked fine then, so I am going to go ahead and rule that out, and save myself the trouble of unhooking it. Also, I was detonating before I installed the crane ignition, so I am gunna have to say that isn't the problem either. Other than that, there are really no other piggy backs.

As for the detonation,
It comes in about 2700rpm and hangs out until around 4000 rpm.
If I lean out the fuel mix it will stay sometimes until redline. And it doesn't really matter what throttle position, it is more based on the RPM. However, and this is kinda hard to explain. At certain loads/gears/ rpms/ etc., it takes a different throttle position. For instance, sometimes if it is detonating while I am trying to just gain a little speed say 45% throttle, I will give it 100% throttle and the detonating goes away. But in other gears at different speeds, etc. if I come off the throttle then it goes away.
I hope I didn't confuse anyone, and if there is something more specific you would like to know, I can tell you.

One thing I am not sure of at this point is how to find the 'exact' 0 point on the exhaust cam.

I can see when the timing marks are lined up, but for as far as 'exact' 0 goes... that is gunna be tricky. I will give it my best shot though.

I really appreciate the help, and if you all still sudgest getting rid of the piggy backs, then I will, I just think that in my opinion that can be ruled out.

thanks again!

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                        
TalonSpeedFeb-21-05 04:14 PM
Member since Oct 15th 2002
446 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113141, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results"
In response to Reply # 48


          

i still think u are running rich. did u ever fix the check engine light?

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                            
bzossFeb-22-05 05:11 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113142, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 49


          

If you read up a bit, in one of my posts, I said why I believe my car is running rich, which it is...
The knocking causes my car to retard it's timing, which in turn, richens the fuel. Basically, when I fix the knock, then I will simultaneously fix the fuel problem. And yes, my CEL is still in, cuz I still have the knock problem.

See if this makes any sence to you, this is my new theory on the detonation, and why it might be doing it:

I have total seal piston rings. These rings specifically say to disable the PCV valve in order to prevent sucking oil from the head of your car causing you to burn oil. This is due to the way the total seal rings completely seal in the cylinder.
I did disable my PCV valve, and replaced the lines with breathers. All that did was give a place for oil to build up in and drip out. Instead of sucking in oil, my car was shooting it out the breathers, also I didn't feel like there was adequate ventilation of the crankcase. So I re-installed the PCV valve, but I left the line off that connects from the intake pipe to the driver's side of the crankcase.
To try and make this short, I am sucking in oil, in large amounts to say it lightly. I would say I burn about 1 qt of oil for every 2 tanks of gas, literally.
I think that those little oil dropplets getting into my cylinders under compression are what might be causing the detonation. Does that make sense to anyone else?
If so, any sudgestions on how to adequately ventilate the crankcase, without sucking a bunch of oil in?
One idea I had was to get a more mild PCV valve, one off an old big block what would shut at about 17" of vacuum, vice ours.

I am completely open to sudgestions, so keep droppin' 'em on me.

Oh, still waiting for a good sudgestion for getting the exhaust cam to the 'exact' zero point.

Thanks for your help!

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                
TalonSpeedFeb-23-05 06:05 AM
Member since Oct 15th 2002
446 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113143, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 50


          

install a catchcan maybe??

how many codes are on the ecu??

I would turn the afc OFF
turn the crane ignition OFF
pull the fuse to the ecu and let the ecu reset
put fuse back in, and start car and let it idle for a minute

then take it for a test drive.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                    
bzossFeb-23-05 06:56 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113144, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 51


          

The codes are the same as the two I posted above.
The knocking one, and the one that means I am running rich. That is it.

I can't really turn the crane ignition OFF, or the AFC OFF. I would have to completely undo the splicing and wiring, etc. and re-wire back to stock, and then vice versa to put it all back.

Did you read my oil theory?
What do you think about that, could it be causing the knocking?

For the catch can, do I just route a seperate line back to the oil pan to drain the oil collected? -- Never had turbo, => never used a catchcan

I am going to play with the exaust cam timing this weekend when I get time, and see what that does.
Also going to disconnect the pcv valve temporarily to see if my oil theory is correct. I hope it is, cuz that would be a super easy fix comparitively.

Thanks for the support!

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                        
BlizareFeb-23-05 02:39 PM
Donating 2GNT member
7595 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113145, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 52




          

Goto the paint store and but a couple gallons of toluene, Fill up the tank with premium.

15L of toluene and 45L of 92 octane should yeild about a 98.

You should NOT be detonating then with the higher octane.

If it works then you KNOW that it IS detonation.

just a suggestion.


I eat emo kids for breakfast

1995 Eagle Talon (SOLD)
72' SuperBeetle
72' Standard Beetle
56' Deluxe Beetle

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                            
bzossFeb-24-05 04:42 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113146, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 53


          

that is what I entend to do, I just want to try and get it to go away before I do that. I don't want to have to fill up with $5.00 per gallon gas every time I go to the pump just because my compression is too high, so if I can get rid of it without having to run race fuel, then that would be much more preferred.
On the other hand, if that is the only thing left, and that is the only way to get rid of it, then that is what I am going to have to do.
Then, sometime in the near future, I would probably replace my 10.5:1's for some 8.5:1's and boost the bitch.
In reality, that is what I wish I would have done the entire time. Then I wouldn't be having this problem.

Thanks for the comments,

-Brandon

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                
TeamXtremeRSMar-04-05 07:10 PM
Member since May 20th 2003
6329 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113147, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 54
Mar-04-05 07:14 PM by XtremeRS

          

A really easy way to see if your cam gears are marked correctly, is to put them on top of a set of stock cam gears. Match up the center dowel pin slot on each gear, then find the stock gear timing mark on the outer edge of the cam gear. Mark that spot on the adjustable cam gear. If your head was milled .004" or more, then it will make your timing gears off approx 1/4 to 1/2 tooth off. 1/2 tooth off equals about 5 cam degrees. You really need to datalog your car too see what your timing is, and other engine performace variables, and sensor readings..If you are truly timed perfectly, and 10.5:1 compression ratio, then stock timing advance with 93 should absolutly not knock at all.. Also, almost 300psi is ALOT of compression pressure. Stock @ 9.6:1 is roughly around 220. Raising compresson ratio only 9 tenths will NOT give that much compression pressure increase. Either you have a mechanical timing issue, or you have a higher compression ratio. Considerably higher...I really think you have 12.5:1.. The ease at which the motor knocks, and the amount of compression pressure you have..just makes sense to me


13.5 @108 MPH-2.2 60ft(stupid FWD!)
S16G @ 18 PSI/FMIC/Running on MegaSquirt II (Now with sequential
fuel injection)

My webpage: http://eclipsed4evr.home.comcast.net
-1998 Mitsubishi Eclipse RS-T- "Toy"
-1992 Plymouth Laser Turbo AWD(SOLD)
-2000 Honda CR-V(daily)

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                    
bzossMar-06-05 05:35 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113148, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 55


          

That is what it has come down to for me as well,

This is what I think happened:

HowellAutomotive sent me the wrong pistons. I ordered 10.5:1, but I have to have 12.5:1 given the symptoms. Either that or the pistons were not made for the longer rods that I have, but I don't think that is the case. I think I just got the wrong fucking pistons, which really pisses me off, however. Now that I have to replace them anyway, I am going to go ahead and turbo. I wasn't too impressed with the performance after the upgrades.
One thing that does have me confused however is that cylinder 1's compression is only about 225 while the others are all around 285. I wonder if I got one 10.5:1 piston and the others are 12.5:1. Given howell's record, I would not put it past them.

One more thing that urks me, is that I might have to go back to them to get the 8.5:1 pistons...

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                        
TeamMichael_97RSMar-07-05 05:34 PM
Donating 2GNT member
5866 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113149, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 56


          

Originally posted by bzoss
That is what it has come down to for me as well, This is what I think happened: HowellAutomotive sent me the wrong pistons. I ordered 10.5:1, but I have to have 12.5:1 given the symptoms. Either that or the pistons were not made for the longer rods that I have, but I don't think that is the case. I think I just got the wrong fucking pistons, which really pisses me off, however. Now that I have to replace them anyway, I am going to go ahead and turbo. I wasn't too impressed with the performance after the upgrades. One thing that does have me confused however is that cylinder 1's compression is only about 225 while the others are all around 285. I wonder if I got one 10.5:1 piston and the others are 12.5:1. Given howell's record, I would not put it past them. One more thing that urks me, is that I might have to go back to them to get the 8.5:1 pistons...


You should not have that much of a difference in compression. You have a problem, you really need to get to the bottom of. 285 does sound high for only 10.5:1.

If the the pistons weren't machined right they wouldn't sit right in the bore, the wrist pin location would be off.

Exile Racing Technologies
http://www.exileracing.com
Assasin of Joy

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                            
bzossMar-08-05 09:37 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113150, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 57


          

Never said that they were machined wrong. The were definetely machined right. I am driving the car now, so they obviously work, the thing is I think that I have 1 piston that is 10.5:1, and the rest are 12.5:1. I got screwed over somehow. I just can't explain the detonation or the difference in compression between the cylinders any other way than this. If anyone out there can come up with a better senerio let me know, PLEASE!
I have had numerous problems with howell trying to get the parts, little own get the right parts. I had to send a number of items back, and request new items because I had the wrong parts. I don't put it past them to completely fuck up my piston order as well.
Needless to say, there are many people on this site who will we agree with my on howell's performance record. I ordered 10.5:1, no way are at least 3 of those pistons 10.5:1, not with that kind of compression. Now I have to pull my motor, AGAIN, put new pistons in, and just the thought of doing that crap all over again is annoying as all hell.
Moral of the story, NEVER BUY ANYTHING OF IMPORTANCE FROM HOWELL. GET IT FROM SOMEONE YOU CAN TRUST. AND BELIEVE ME, HOWELL IS NOT TO BE TRUSTED WITH ANY BIG ORDER.
I wouldn't buy anything more than shop towells from them at this point. And they would probably fuck that order up as well, I might get a B.O.V. or some shit instead of shop towells.

Anyhoo, I don't expect too many people out there wish to listen to me complain all day, but I have determined the cause of the detonation, and I appreciate everyone's input along the way.
BTW: HAH! Told you the timing was correct!

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                
kain_99gsMar-20-05 03:41 PM
Member since May 04th 2004
536 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113151, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 58


          

umm I might be completely stupid, but wouldn't you notice the difference from one piston to the other 3 =?

Originally posted by bzoss
I wouldn't buy anything more than shop towells from them at this point. And they would probably fuck that order up as well, I might get a B.O.V. or some shit instead of shop towells.


Umm this just sounds rediculous. I know you are mad, but you don't really make sense with this statement. unless a BOV is less important then shop towels ;p

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
TeamAvengerMar-20-05 05:00 PM
Old School 2GNTer
2453 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113152, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 59




          

What does your piston spec sheet say? Have you bothered to call them up? This may be dumb but maybe you should get some evidence ... maybe pull the head off and take a look at the top of the piston tops. There should be a noticeable difference between the pistons. I understand that you're upset but there can be a ton of reasons why you're getting the problems you're having. It just doesn't make sense that the pistons would get mixed/matched.

-"Easy Mac"
05 Mazda RX-8 (RR8 #88)
99 Eclipse RS 398whp & 372lb-ft

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
bzossMar-22-05 09:14 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113153, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 60


          

I am in the process of pulling the motor, AGAIN, but it is going to be slow as I don't have much time to get it done right now.

I know it sounds rediculous, but do you have a better excuse?

Another thing, no matter if the pistons are the same or if there is a different one, nothing disputes the fact that my compression is way too high, and it is due to having the wrong pistons.

There is either one of two things:

I got 12.5:1 pistons, or I have 10.5:1 pistons that are designed to go on the stock rod.
During the rebuild I upgraded to the long rod. And howell knew this as I orded everything as a 'kit'.

So, reguardless of the pistons being different or not the above remains true, and I have to lower compression if I am going to continue driving my car without completely ruining the motor.

On the brighter side;
I am going to just say fuck it, and slap a turbo on the beotch, which I think a lot of 2gnt'ers will be happy to hear.



On that note, I want to use a water cooled turbo. Anyone have any recommendations?

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
DegreEMar-22-05 09:17 AM
Member since Jul 04th 2004
303 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113154, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 61




          

boooo


I'd be really happy to hear a N/A 2gNT DSM stay side-by side with a turbo 2gNT side-by-side to a Spraying 2gNT

<--This is our god... god decides our fate. We shall not upset our god. God can and will ruin our lives if we were to upset him.

OBX 4-1 Ceramic Coated Headder, EGR Block-off kit, Howell 30% Underdrive pulley, EBay Cold-Air Intake, Holley Air Mass CatBack Exhaust System: 2.5" pipe w/ 5" tip

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
Initial DSMMar-22-05 01:44 PM
Member since Sep 23rd 2003
2833 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113155, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 62




          

Originally posted by DegreE
boooo I'd be really happy to hear a N/A 2gNT DSM stay side-by side with a turbo 2gNT side-by-side to a Spraying 2gNT


Thats only maybe gonna happen if its a 2.4 swapped N/A if that.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
bzossMar-23-05 11:26 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113156, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 63


          

That wouldn't happen even with a 2.4 swap. That is why I am just going to bit the bullet and go turbo.

BTW:

I did another compression check, all cylinders are the same now. I think that the rings just didn't seal all the way when I did the first check.
They are all above 300psi. I can't read any higher than that on the gage.

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
ScandelousApr-07-05 02:07 PM
Member since Jul 19th 2004
445 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113157, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 64


          

Just some food for thought. Reccently I did a compression test on a friends 94 Civic HB with a H22a swap. Stock compression is around 10.2:1 I believe. On the compression tester gauge it was reading out about 240-250 psi per cylinder and this is a motor with about 80,000 hard miles on it. A fresh 10.5:1 motor sounds about right at 285ish psi.

On another note I don't believe you will ever see 200whp with that set-up. You need serious aggressive cams and some really good port work. Check out some Honda sights for info on basic all motor set-ups. The reason they can do it is that the VTEC cams have a very aggressive cam profile stock. Maybe even more than the stg 3's or 0018's. That is where you are going to make the power.

As for the Celica GTS. They put down around 165 whp stock. Check out Sport Compact Car April 02 issue. There is no reason that you can't do it in a 420a with some great cams.

I don't know what the knocking is but motorcycles have a much better combustion chamber design for the higher cr on pump gas.

Good luck and I am looking forward to seeing a 2gnt with 200+ whp all motor!

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
Initial DSMApr-07-05 05:42 PM
Member since Sep 23rd 2003
2833 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113158, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 64




          

Originally posted by bzoss
That wouldn't happen even with a 2.4 swap.


Actually that could happen. Someone just did an NA swap with a stock bottom end and he should be around 200hp on the dyno once tuned correctly.
So imagine what it'd be if it were with higher compression.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
TeamMichael_97RSApr-08-05 05:44 AM
Donating 2GNT member
5866 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113159, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 66


          

Originally posted by Initial DSM
Originally posted by bzoss That wouldn't happen even with a 2.4 swap.
Actually that could happen. Someone just did an NA swap with a stock bottom end and he should be around 200hp on the dyno once tuned correctly. So imagine what it'd be if it were with higher compression.


It's already been done over on neons.org

Exile Racing Technologies
http://www.exileracing.com
Go that way, really fast, if something gets in your way... turn.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
Initial DSMApr-08-05 07:28 PM
Member since Sep 23rd 2003
2833 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113160, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 67




          

Originally posted by Michael_97RS
Originally posted by Initial DSM
Originally posted by bzoss That wouldn't happen even with a 2.4 swap.
Actually that could happen. Someone just did an NA swap with a stock bottom end and he should be around 200hp on the dyno once tuned correctly. So imagine what it'd be if it were with higher compression.
It's already been done over on neons.org


Well Yeah...but I didnt want to use the Neon example because I didnt want to hear the whole 'not quite the same car' response/excuse.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
TeamDR1665Apr-13-05 10:12 AM
Donating 2GNT member
14692 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113161, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 68


          

I would just be happy to see the poster's sig reduced to something less than it's current 500 words.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
bzossApr-14-05 10:12 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113162, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 69


          

Ok, got the motor out, broke the thing in half (figure of speech), anyhow, and cc'd the motor. I am getting 13.25:1 for my final compression ratio.
So I guess that explains the detonation problem...

The gage I used to do the compression check only goes to 300psi, and I stopped turning the car over when it got close to that so I didn't brake it or something, but in my frustration I just let it pump over to see what compression could get to. Lets just say that the needle went back to 0. well over 300psi was in each cylinder, just don't know exactly how much more. I would venture to say about 320psi.

The pistons turned out to actually be 12.5:1, so I got fucked by howell. That in combination with the machine work got my compression way up there.

The 8.8:1's are going in soon, and shortly after I should have the car back up and running.
I think that I am going to shoot some nitrous instead of boost. Mainly for cost reasons.

I also plan on a new set of cams this time round as well.

oh, quit hating on the sig. One day you to will have enough mods to make a list that long...

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
TeamDR1665Apr-14-05 10:40 AM
Donating 2GNT member
14692 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113163, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 70


          

Originally posted by bzoss
oh, quit hating on the sig. One day you to will have enough mods to make a list that long...

www.dsmregistry.com/detail.php?carid=213

I'll be sure to let you know what I put to the wheels next month. Hopefully you'll have your shit together by then. Kthx.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
TeamMichael_97RSApr-15-05 01:19 PM
Donating 2GNT member
5866 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113164, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 70


          

Well sounds like you solved it. Detonation and power don't go hand in hand.

Did yuo take into acount the head gasket thickness when you ran your compression calcs?

Exile Racing Technologies
http://www.exileracing.com
Go that way, really fast, if something gets in your way... turn.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
Initial DSMApr-16-05 09:57 AM
Member since Sep 23rd 2003
2833 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113165, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 72




          

How does shooting nitrous on a low compression motor with bigger cams equal to less cost overall to boosting it?

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
TeamMichael_97RSApr-16-05 12:48 PM
Donating 2GNT member
5866 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113166, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 73


          

Originally posted by Initial DSM
How does shooting nitrous on a low compression motor with bigger cams equal to less cost overall to boosting it?


Probably because a nitrous kit is less than a turbo kit.

But I wouldn't drop compression just to boost. If you are going to spray as an intermediate step to turbo that's different.

Exile Racing Technologies
http://www.exileracing.com
Go that way, really fast, if something gets in your way... turn.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
Initial DSMApr-16-05 11:34 PM
Member since Sep 23rd 2003
2833 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113167, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 74




          

Originally posted by Michael_97RS
Originally posted by Initial DSM How does shooting nitrous on a low compression motor with bigger cams equal to less cost overall to boosting it?
Probably because a nitrous kit is less than a turbo kit. But I wouldn't drop compression just to boost. If you are going to spray as an intermediate step to turbo that's different. Exile Racing Technologies http://www.exileracing.com Go that way, really fast, if something gets in your way... turn.


Yes. I suppose I should have clarified. I did know the answer. But with bigger cams, (as I suspect he's probably going to skip over the 14's since there is hardly a difference between them vs 12's on an NA) on a low comp 2.0L motor, it would suck as a daily driver if your permanent decision is to keep it 8:8:1 NA with a bottle of nitrous.
Unless you plan to be spraying constantly everyday to get around.
In this case, in the long run, boost is cheaper.
(But I am kidding really, who would do that? spraying nitrous daily to get around)
One would then assume, that doing this as an 'intermediate' phase would be his reasoning.
Although the addition of the 'bigger' cams, along with lowering his compression, while keeping it NA, is what puzzled me.
That is, unless this is a 'track only' race car.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
bzossApr-17-05 11:10 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113168, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 75


          

yes, i took into account head gasket thickness in my calculations.


also, I plan to keep the cams I have as this IS a daily driver, and god knows cams like that don't make for good idle. The extra power would be nice, however, it really won't be that much more. I say MAYBE 10 whp. I think that would be pushing it as well. Plus I didn't expect having to drop the cash to basically re-do my bottom end. That sort of put a damper on my pocket book.

Lastly, I will probably just be juicing as an intermediate step. Just until I can save some cash to boost it. I also want a water cooled set-up which I am having a hard time finding. Turbonetic's will upgrade any turbo for just $40.00, but getting star to include it in their kit is a different story.

I still plan to push about 160whp with the lower compression now that the car will be running right. In some of the first posts I talked about a ticking sound from the cam gear area. Well, got that solved, the pistons were coming into slight contact with the head.... yes, I know crazy.
So basically a lot of shit was going wrong, robbing me of power, so I expect to get considerably more with it running right, even without the higher compression.

I do appreciate all of your input, and I have learned a great deal through this whole experience, so if any of you have any questions I think that I have damn near become a regional expert on our motors at this point.

Thanks a lot!


oh, don't buy from howell. <-- I think I might add that to my sig, what do you think.. LOL

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
SaberKhanApr-28-05 01:19 PM
Old School 2GNTer
994 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113169, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 76
Apr-28-05 01:23 PM by SaberKhan

          

I noticed in your mods list you had a "full race port, oversized valves and bored runners and TB". Exactly how much did you have ported out? How big are the valves? Also, what do you rev to? Alot of people get carried away with porting and end up with ports so big they wont start flowing until the 6000rpm range. Bigger isnt always better. Velocity is key in N/A engines. Its restriction to flow that creates velocity. Thats why CAI's are different diameters at different lengths. The name for that design is called the Helmholtz chamber. Its all hydraulics. Hogging out the intake ports will cause you to lose next to all port velocity at acceptable streetable RPM's (less than 7000rpms). Unless you are able to supply the ports with enough volume to make them useful, ie a turbocharger. Try blowing into a straw hard, the air coming out is sped up due to the restriction, and you still get the full volume out of the end. Now try blowing into a piece of 3inch pipe, you get very little at the end. If you supplied the pipe with enough volume, you'd get great velocity and flow, but you have to have that volume to do so. With a small displacement N/A engine relying on the atmosphere to fill its cylinders, huge intake ports without some crazy race spec cams, a 10000RPM redline and some careful 3rd wave exhaust tuning, will do nothing but hurt performance. Same goes for huge valves and gigantic throttlebodies. You're really killing your VE and not filling the cylinders as they should be, the only thing probably saving you from making less than stock power is the high compression. Hell, 4G63's with 1mm oversized valves making 350WHP lose power until the boost gets up there in the higher RPM's. Seeing how 420a engines can support enough flow to make 500+HP with a turbo, they flow plenty enough for street N/A applications. A raceport for anything less than a full fledge race engine is simply overkill and wont perform in real world condidions, as you have seen. I'd go with stock ports, possibly some extrudehoning, and a good clean polishing. I'd bet you'd make an assload more power.


91 awd: 60-1, 880's, E-Prom, etc.
93 awd: JDM 6 bolt, K&N, full exhaust, Wally 255, otherwise stock.

R.I.P. the original "Factory Freak"
15.5's with short ram and catback only
1996 RS 5-speed

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
bzossApr-28-05 04:14 PM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113170, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 77


          

I don't have anything EXTREME, for the port.
I opened up the ports about 1~2mm not much. along with 1mm oversized valves.

the TB is not bored, same as stock.

overbored .020"

I believe that for my application that I didn't 'overdo' the porting. I am aware of porting too much, and how it can actually kill power.
Another thing is that I plan to turbo in the future, just don't have the cash right now.
Also, I switched those pistons for 8.6:1's. If you read the whole thread you will see why.

Because there are no after market computers for 98+ without going stand alone, I am basically using the stock ecu => still redlining at 7200rpm. With the internals I have, and the machine work, balancing etc. I can go to ~9000rpm safely. I just can't due to the computer which kinda pisses me off... but what can you do?

Not too much of a loss however, due to the cam I have really not being to effecient at that rpm. I actually start losing power above about 6500. the cam effecting range is 2000-6800rpm. So reving much higher than that is really not useful unless I change the cam out, which I don't plan on doing.

I am going to turbo, and leave it at that.

thanks for the input!

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
SaberKhanApr-28-05 04:59 PM
Old School 2GNTer
994 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113171, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 78
Apr-28-05 05:04 PM by SaberKhan

          

Well, I assumed it was aggressive when you said full race port. Also, the only reason I replied to this thread was because you were complaining of not making any power on a N/A setup. Which, if you were going fully N/A, your mods wouldnt be the best way to achieve maximum HP. But, since you're going turbo, more power to you. I'm sure she'll be a beast Also, it says right there in your signature that you have a bored TB.


91 awd: 60-1, 880's, E-Prom, etc.
93 awd: JDM 6 bolt, K&N, full exhaust, Wally 255, otherwise stock.

R.I.P. the original "Factory Freak"
15.5's with short ram and catback only
1996 RS 5-speed

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
bzossApr-29-05 04:19 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113172, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 79


          

I know, I have tried to change it, but something keeps messing up when I do. I have tried to shorten my signature about 1000 times because people keep complaining about it.

Sorry for the misconception.

I oringinally planned to bore it out, but then I read up on a few things, basically learning what you just said.

you should read my whole thread, you will see why I was not making any power NA.
Now that I have gone low compression, I really won't make much power, but that is going to be ok, because I can boost the hell out of it with the built bottom end that I have in her.

thanks for the input!

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
bzossApr-29-05 04:20 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113173, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 80


          

I completely erased my signature before that last post, and all the same stuff still comes up. I don't get it...

anyhoo, no you know, I don't have a bored TB.

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
cougar694uApr-29-05 06:04 AM
Donating 2GNT member
3381 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113174, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 81




          

send me your password and I'll change it for you

~Luke
Facebook
1969 Cougar - 11.91 - 380HP
2007 GSXR 750
1999 OZ - SOLD - 15.26 NA - 14.71 on 75 shot

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
bzossApr-29-05 09:36 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113175, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 82


          

changed my password to 1234 for now.

if you could fix it I would love you.... well... anyhoo..

just put something like:
too much to list...
or some crap like that.


AEM Cold Air w/ Bypass
AEM Adjustable Cam Gears (tuned)
Lightened UDP
Aluminum Stage I SPEC Clutch
S-AFC II (tuned)
Crane Stage II Nitrous Cams
SBI Lifters / Lash Adjusters
SBI Rocker Arms
Complete Race Port and Polish
1mm Oversized Stainless Valves
Crane Valve Springs
FELPRO Gasket Set
Bored Intake Runners, Manifold, TB
JE 10.5:1 Pistons
Long Rod Kit
Clevitte 77 Bearing Kit
Balanced Rotating Assymbly
Greddy Headers
Greddy Cat-Back
Front and Rear Sway Bar
Front Strut Bar
TIEN SS Coilover set
Camber Kit
Brembo Drilled and Slotted Rotors
Enkei Bortex 17" Rims (16.1lbs each)
Phantom Grip LSD
Bored .020
Total Seal Ring Set
Screamin' Demon Coil
Crane Hi-6 CDI2 Ignition System w/ module
Crane 8.5mm Firewire
24lb Fuel Injectors

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
TeamDR1665Apr-29-05 08:20 AM
Donating 2GNT member
14692 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113176, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 80


          

Originally posted by bzoss
I can boost the hell out of it with the built bottom end that I have in her.

Quitter.

Haha. I don't know whether I am the pot or the kettle, but it's nice to meet you. I can't wait until my MSnS shows up and I can wind her out to 9krpm or so. Feels like she's still pulling at 7500rpm. It will be interesting to see where peak whp occurs on Daisy this summer.

Then, this winter, the forced induction begins...

I think we all go that way eventually. The boost bug bit me almost 5 years ago (before I even knew about 2GNT), and I've been fighting it ever since. Time I just give in and admit defeat, but I'm not going down without getting my name in the history books of DSM.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
bzossApr-29-05 09:31 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113177, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 83


          


what is the MSnS? And where do you get one?



AEM Cold Air
AEM Adjustable Cam Gears (tuned)
Lightened UDP
Aluminum Stage I SPEC Clutch
S-AFC II (tuned)
Crane Stage II Nitrous Cams
SBI Lifters / Lash Adjusters
SBI Rocker Arms
Complete Port and Polish
1mm Oversized Stainless Valves
Crane Valve Springs
Victory Gasket Set
Bored Intake Runners, Manifold
JE 8.6:1 Pistons
Long Rod Kit
Clevitte 77 Bearing Kit
Balanced Rotating Assymbly
Greddy Headers
Greddy Cat-Back
Front and Rear Sway Bar
Front Strut Bar
TIEN SS Coilover set
Camber Kit Front and Rear
GSX Front Brake Upgrade
Brembo Drilled and Slotted Rotors
Enkei Bortex 17" Rims (16.1lbs each)
Phantom Grip LSD
Bored .020
Federal Mogal Ring Set
Screamin' Demon Coil
Crane Hi-6 CDI2 Ignition System w/ module
Crane 8.5mm Firewire
19lb Fuel Injectors

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
TeamDR1665Apr-29-05 01:28 PM
Donating 2GNT member
14692 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113178, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 84


          

Originally posted by bzoss
what is the MSnS? And where do you get one?



LMAO! Where have you been, man? Under a rock?

MSnS = MegaSquirt'n'Spark. There is practically an entire sub-forum dedicated to it in the Performance/Engine forum. It's also being offered by one of the site vendors and is advertised at the top of the index page.

Basically, it's a DIY "stand alone" that can control your fuel and ignition. Completely programmable and has a wealth of special features built into it such as stutter box, water injection, etc.. It is not a true stand alone because it does not completely replace the ECU, but you can wind it out to something like 15,000rpm if you like.

I plan on setting myself a soft-touch limiter at 8500rpm, pulling timing a little bit so that I will feel it before my self-imposed redline, then a hard cut rev limiter at 9000rpm when I take her to the dyno. I'll be able to see where my peak hp occurs at the wheels, and dial down my rev limiter accordingly.

Haha. And you thought I was jealous of your set up. You and I have more in common than you know.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
bzossApr-30-05 02:58 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113179, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 86


          

I realized what that ment a little bit after I posted that, anyhoo,... how extensive is the install, and how big is that damn MS box?

I also think that you will be suprized at when we do make our peak horse power. I have been to the dyno quite a bit, and even with cams that are suppost to increase my power band to ~6800, and all the polish work, etc. I still peak power around 5800 - 6000 rpm or so.
Make sure that the dyno you go to has an accurate rpm scale. Some don't, but those are the really crappy ones, also if the dyno technician doesn't know what he is doing, then he will fuck that part all up too.

Good luck however.

Oh, how much does one of those mega squirt thingy's cost?

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
TeamDR1665May-01-05 07:18 PM
Donating 2GNT member
14692 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113180, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 87


          

Originally posted by bzoss
how extensive is the install, and how big is that damn MS box?

I ran most of my wires before the engine went in and it took me a couple hours. Might be a bit trickier with the engine in place, but there are some good pictures in the Engine Mgmt forum, here, of Matt and my wire ups. The box isn't too large. I'm guessing 8"Lx5"Wx3"T. I'm thinking of installing mine either under the radio or in the center console. (If it ever shows up...)

Originally posted by bzoss
I also think that you will be suprized at when we do make our peak horse power. I have been to the dyno quite a bit, and even with cams that are suppost to increase my power band to ~6800, and all the polish work, etc. I still peak power around 5800 - 6000 rpm or so. Make sure that the dyno you go to has an accurate rpm scale. Some don't, but those are the really crappy ones, also if the dyno technician doesn't know what he is doing, then he will fuck that part all up too. Good luck however.

I'm looking forward to finding out first hand. I might just take her to the dyno untuned to see what she does, and then see what I can get out of her with the MSnS installed later. Thanks for the head's up on the Dyno though. I hadn't heard about that before. Not that it really matters to me. Well, okay it does. I'm hoping to break 180whp somehow. We'll see...

Originally posted by bzoss
Oh, how much does one of those mega squirt thingy's cost?

forums.2gnt.com/dcboard.php?az=search&select_forum=




  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
RST95eclipseMay-10-05 04:41 AM
Member since Oct 19th 2004
403 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113181, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 88


          

Hahahaha. Nice link.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
TeamDR1665May-10-05 05:55 AM
Donating 2GNT member
14692 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113182, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 89


          

Originally posted by RST95eclipse
Hahahaha. Nice link.


Thanks.

bzoss - I finally got my MS. I'm going to try to have it controlling fuel by the end of this month and spark by the end of next. Should hopefully be making some news on the dyno sometime in July.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
cougar694uMay-10-05 07:34 AM
Donating 2GNT member
3381 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113183, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 91
May-10-05 07:34 AM by cougar694u



          

Originally posted by DR1665
bzoss - I finally got my MS. I'm going to try to have it controlling fuel by the end of this month and spark by the end of next. Should hopefully be making some news on the dyno sometime in July.


I think it'd be nice to see a before and after. Don't you have the AF/X ecu already? Go make a few pulls with your current setup. Then, make a few pulls with the MS to compare. Then, make a few more pulls with the MSnS for a better comparison.

And Then...

~Luke
Facebook
1969 Cougar - 11.91 - 380HP
2007 GSXR 750
1999 OZ - SOLD - 15.26 NA - 14.71 on 75 shot

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
TeamDR1665May-10-05 08:53 AM
Donating 2GNT member
14692 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113184, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 92


          

Originally posted by cougar694u
I think it'd be nice to see a before and after. Don't you have the AF/X ecu already? Go make a few pulls with your current setup. Then, make a few pulls with the MS to compare. Then, make a few more pulls with the MSnS for a better comparison. And Then...


Good call, but three trips to the dyno between now and the SO would run me something like $150. That's $150 that I need for a windshield so I can run her. I've also never taken her to the track. I have to get some practice if I hope to stand a chance against Todd "The Machine" Scungio in Norwalk. Then again, beginner's luck...

Don't forget, fellas. I will have the AFX/R in there being a dummy while the MSnS is running the show. I'm pretty sure that I can disable the spark on the MS and even revert back to OEM control on the fuel if I wish to. I won't be installing larger injectors unless I really think I need them (on surface streets - low rpm - I run WAY too rich on stock injectors - soot all over everything). So, I'm thinking we can tune the MS, then tune it with spark, then take it to the dyno. Make a couple test pulls to ensure it's all dialed in, then let the AFX control spark on a pull, then let the AFX control it all on a pull. 4-5 pulls TOPS and all these answers at once.

I definitely want to see the limits of all motor 2GNT tuning and I know I have the car that can do it. Just need my cam gears to show up here one of these days...

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
cougar694uMay-10-05 10:58 AM
Donating 2GNT member
3381 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113185, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 93




          

Originally posted by DR1665
I've also never taken her to the track. I have to get some practice if I hope to stand a chance against Todd "The Machine" Scungio in Norwalk. Then again, beginner's luck...
As optimistic as I am, I don't think you have a chance at beating him in a heads up race. If you've never been to the track, you don't know what you have to prepare for.

It took me years to get where I am now. My brother's been racing longer than me and still has shitty reaction times.

You'll see when you're sitting the the staging lanes for the first time, just waiting for the line to roll, then finally lining up and looking down the track. You'll see. My heart's pounding already thinking about it.


Originally posted by DR1665
Good call, but three trips to the dyno between now and the SO would run me something like $150. That's $150 that I need for a windshield so I can run her...Make a couple test pulls to ensure it's all dialed in, then let the AFX control spark on a pull, then let the AFX control it all on a pull. 4-5 pulls TOPS and all these answers at once.
That's a good idea.


Originally posted by DR1665
I definitely want to see the limits of all motor 2GNT tuning and I know I have the car that can do it. Just need my cam gears to show up here one of these days...
You'd have to do better than mine (if I ever figure out what I'm gonna do with the damn thing).

~Luke
Facebook
1969 Cougar - 11.91 - 380HP
2007 GSXR 750
1999 OZ - SOLD - 15.26 NA - 14.71 on 75 shot

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
SILVERNTMay-11-05 04:05 PM
Member since Oct 05th 2002
4543 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113186, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 94


          

Originally posted by cougar694u
Originally posted by DR1665 I've also never taken her to the track. I have to get some practice if I hope to stand a chance against Todd "The Machine" Scungio in Norwalk. Then again, beginner's luck...
As optimistic as I am, I don't think you have a chance at beating him in a heads up race. If you've never been to the track, you don't know what you have to prepare for. It took me years to get where I am now. My brother's been racing longer than me and still has shitty reaction times. You'll see when you're sitting the the staging lanes for the first time, just waiting for the line to roll, then finally lining up and looking down the track. You'll see. My heart's pounding already thinking about it.
Originally posted by DR1665 Good call, but three trips to the dyno between now and the SO would run me something like $150. That's $150 that I need for a windshield so I can run her...Make a couple test pulls to ensure it's all dialed in, then let the AFX control spark on a pull, then let the AFX control it all on a pull. 4-5 pulls TOPS and all these answers at once.
That's a good idea.
Originally posted by DR1665 I definitely want to see the limits of all motor 2GNT tuning and I know I have the car that can do it. Just need my cam gears to show up here one of these days...
You'd have to do better than mine (if I ever figure out what I'm gonna do with the damn thing).


shootout is bracketracing. Driggs if youve never ran, chances are you wont keep up with Todds consistancy

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
TeamDR1665May-11-05 06:35 PM
Donating 2GNT member
14692 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113187, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 96


          

Originally posted by SILVERNT
shootout is bracketracing. Driggs if youve never ran, chances are you wont keep up with Todds consistancy

I don't need to keep up with "the machine's" consistency. I just need to get that one ET that is lower than he does. Not even that. I just need to hit a 14.999 before anyone else and my all motor goals are nearly complete.


I hear ya, though.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
bzossMay-10-05 05:31 AM
Member since Jun 14th 2003
298 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113188, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 88


          

you should, and then post the results, I think many people would be interested to see them. Me included.

Built block.
Refinished head.
Tuned suspension.
TURBO.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                                                                    
TeamMichael_97RSMay-10-05 11:08 AM
Donating 2GNT member
5866 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113189, "RE: All Motor 2GNT Dyno Results -- New theory"
In response to Reply # 87


          

Originally posted by bzoss
I realized what that ment a little bit after I posted that, anyhoo,... how extensive is the install, and how big is that damn MS box? I also think that you will be suprized at when we do make our peak horse power. I have been to the dyno quite a bit, and even with cams that are suppost to increase my power band to ~6800, and all the polish work, etc. I still peak power around 5800 - 6000 rpm or so. Make sure that the dyno you go to has an accurate rpm scale. Some don't, but those are the really crappy ones, also if the dyno technician doesn't know what he is doing, then he will fuck that part all up too. Good luck however. Oh, how much does one of those mega squirt thingy's cost?


If I can find my dyno from years ago at the shoot out. With my Crower 2 the power pulls to redline, it doesn't fall off at 6k. It's better to look at the power curve anyway. I'd rather have an engine that makes 180hp for a longer portion of the rmp range than an engine that peaks at 200hp but raises and falls steaply from that number.

On a true all motor, high compression set up, the cams you have are just too conservative. And to make good power on high compression you need good control of both fuel and timing.

Really your experience with your car and the dyno is not the best example to go by, since you never managed to dial her in.

RPM scale is dependant upon what kind of ignition you have and what ability the dyno software has to collect accurate data based on parameters entered. CD Boxes can throw off dyno numbers because they can hold spark for a longer duration in the lower rpm range and fire like normal in the higher rpm range. It's all a matter of set up and interface.

Exile Racing Technologies
http://www.exileracing.com
Go that way, really fast, if something gets in your way... turn.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine topic #113092 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.34595799446106 seconds, executing 12 queries.