Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 1 User in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Turbo/Nitrous Tech topic #45779
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: 420A vs 4g63" Previous topic | Next topic
MR BLUNT 2gntMar-31-03 05:33 AM
Member since Mar 20th 2002
793 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#45918, "RE: 420A vs 4g63"
In response to In response to 9




          

yes w/ some work the 420a is a very good motor and can take the same abuse....the head would definately benefit from cams if your going turbo b/c it will help spool a lot better than our stockers..the map is not the downfall of our computer jsut that the computer isn't made to read anything above atmospheric..i actually like the map sensor much better than the mas b/c its reading whats in our manifold as opposed to something that can be lost before it gets there, ie bov or boost/vacuum leak...if our ecu would do timing retard like the turbos do it would be awsome and we wouldn't need to work around it..but to make a 420a as fast as a gst takes more money..not to mention the fact that we can't really upgrade our tranny like they can which is gay...i love my car and being boosted but to be as fast as my buddy w/ a tsi i have spent easily twice as much as he has...on stock internals w/ a 16g hes running 18psi...impossible to do w/ our stock internals..this has been proven...our engine is great , if you have the money and time boost it, it responds so well to boost..but expect to pay much more to get results


400whp or bust.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

420A vs 4g63 [View all] , dmta02, Mar-29-03 07:11 AM
  RE: 420A vs 4g63, neovb, Mar-29-03 07:59 AM, #1
RE: 420A vs 4g63, Nitrous_RS1997, Mar-29-03 08:39 AM, #2
RE: 420A vs 4g63, dmta02, Mar-29-03 01:38 PM, #3
      RE: 420A vs 4g63, icedout, Mar-29-03 05:30 PM, #4
           RE: 420A vs 4g63, Vandy420a, Mar-29-03 10:02 PM, #5
                RE: 420A vs 4g63, Dualgen2, Mar-30-03 06:25 AM, #6
                     RE: 420A vs 4g63, MR BLUNT 2gnt, Mar-30-03 05:18 PM, #7
                          RE: 420A vs 4g63, dmta02, Mar-30-03 07:54 PM, #8
                               RE: 420A vs 4g63, neovb, Mar-30-03 08:35 PM, #9
                                    RE: 420A vs 4g63, MR BLUNT 2gnt, Mar-31-03 05:33 AM #10
                                         RE: 420A vs 4g63, Vandy420a, Mar-31-03 12:11 PM, #11
                                              RE: 420A vs 4g63, neovb, Mar-31-03 12:21 PM, #12
                                                   RE: 420A vs 4g63, dsmlights, Mar-31-03 03:06 PM, #13
RE: 420A vs 4g63, TeamXtremeRS, Mar-31-03 03:46 PM, #14
RE: 420A vs 4g63, 97eclipseRS, Apr-01-03 12:09 PM, #15
      RE: 420A vs 4g63, Remy, Apr-01-03 12:19 PM, #16

Top 2GNT Technical Turbo/Nitrous Tech topic #45779 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.070094108581543 seconds, executing 12 queries.