Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 1 User in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Turbo/Nitrous Tech topic #45779
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: 420A vs 4g63" Previous topic | Next topic
neovbMar-30-03 08:35 PM
Old School 2GNTer
466 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#45906, "RE: 420A vs 4g63"
In response to In response to 8
Mar-30-03 08:39 PM by neovb

          

Also dont forget that IF you were to buy a GST/GSX, it would run you about 2000$ more than a GS or RS. So there goes your turbo kit

I say the thing that limits the 420A is the fact that it uses a MAP sensor and it ECU. Its obvious that the Karman sensor type is much more suited towards boost than MAP. Plus the fact that our ECU freaks out if it reads any sort of boost, and even if a hacked MAP is used it still freaks out with timing and ignition.

I think if someone made a ECU/Sensor combo pack which replaced the MAP sensor with a Karman, and redid the ECU to actually see boost and like it, we would be in the clear. But that would probably cost wayyyy too much for anyone to actually buy it. Or at least modify our existing ECU to be more lenient with boost.

Thats my .02 cents

And yes, you can measure crankwalk. Any mechanic with knowledge in DSMs can help you out. Youd have to bring him along and hed have to get under the car, but they can measure the amount of play in the crank and see if it is out of spec. Also if you test drive a GST/GSX that has bad crankwalk, when you make left turns the clutch should stick to the floor. Safest bet is to bring a mechanic along to look at the cars with you, and get a warranty with the car

NeoVB
2005 Subaru Impreza 2.5RS
1997 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS TURBO
1995 Mitsubishi Galant ES DOHC TURBO
1991 Eagle Talon TSI AWD

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

420A vs 4g63 [View all] , dmta02, Mar-29-03 07:11 AM
  RE: 420A vs 4g63, neovb, Mar-29-03 07:59 AM, #1
RE: 420A vs 4g63, Nitrous_RS1997, Mar-29-03 08:39 AM, #2
RE: 420A vs 4g63, dmta02, Mar-29-03 01:38 PM, #3
      RE: 420A vs 4g63, icedout, Mar-29-03 05:30 PM, #4
           RE: 420A vs 4g63, Vandy420a, Mar-29-03 10:02 PM, #5
                RE: 420A vs 4g63, Dualgen2, Mar-30-03 06:25 AM, #6
                     RE: 420A vs 4g63, MR BLUNT 2gnt, Mar-30-03 05:18 PM, #7
                          RE: 420A vs 4g63, dmta02, Mar-30-03 07:54 PM, #8
                               RE: 420A vs 4g63, neovb, Mar-30-03 08:35 PM #9
                                    RE: 420A vs 4g63, MR BLUNT 2gnt, Mar-31-03 05:33 AM, #10
                                         RE: 420A vs 4g63, Vandy420a, Mar-31-03 12:11 PM, #11
                                              RE: 420A vs 4g63, neovb, Mar-31-03 12:21 PM, #12
                                                   RE: 420A vs 4g63, dsmlights, Mar-31-03 03:06 PM, #13
RE: 420A vs 4g63, TeamXtremeRS, Mar-31-03 03:46 PM, #14
RE: 420A vs 4g63, 97eclipseRS, Apr-01-03 12:09 PM, #15
      RE: 420A vs 4g63, Remy, Apr-01-03 12:19 PM, #16

Top 2GNT Technical Turbo/Nitrous Tech topic #45779 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.060233116149902 seconds, executing 12 queries.