Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 1 User in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Turbo/Nitrous Tech topic #45779
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: 420A vs 4g63" Previous topic | Next topic
neovbMar-29-03 07:59 AM
Old School 2GNTer
466 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#45780, "RE: 420A vs 4g63"
In response to In response to 0


          

The 4g63 is a mitsubishi motor that came in the turbo eclipses. The 420A is a chrylser motor that came in our cars. Notice that our engines sit on the left side of the engine bay (looking from the front of the car). 4g63 engines sit on the right side of the engine bay. In my opinion, theres no point of even trying to build up a 4g63 block. They are not in our cars, and to swap one into a nonturbo eclipse would cost thousands of dollars. Im not even gonna get into what you would have to buy to actually make a conversion possible, but its very expensive and not worth while.

Although its true that a 4g63 block is more durable and can handle plenty of boost out of the factory, the 420A engine is a good engine as well. If you want to go turbo, all you need to do is buy the turbo kit (hahn or star or custom). That will allow you to run from 6 to 10 psi, based on what stage kit you buy. Our engines will not handle more than 10psi of boost safely, because they were not designed for boost. Youd need to rebuild your bottom end (pistons, rods, etc.) so that you can handle the boost. But even at 6psi, you should be creating somewhere near 200-215 hp at the crank, which is a good number. 10psi should put you somewhere near 270hp at the crank.

Overall, dont try to swap engines, its not a worthwhile effort. Look into buying a turbo kit and redoing your bottom end, or buying a built 420A block from howell. Hope this helps.

NeoVB
2005 Subaru Impreza 2.5RS
1997 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS TURBO
1995 Mitsubishi Galant ES DOHC TURBO
1991 Eagle Talon TSI AWD

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

420A vs 4g63 [View all] , dmta02, Mar-29-03 07:11 AM
  RE: 420A vs 4g63, neovb, Mar-29-03 07:59 AM #1
RE: 420A vs 4g63, Nitrous_RS1997, Mar-29-03 08:39 AM, #2
RE: 420A vs 4g63, dmta02, Mar-29-03 01:38 PM, #3
      RE: 420A vs 4g63, icedout, Mar-29-03 05:30 PM, #4
           RE: 420A vs 4g63, Vandy420a, Mar-29-03 10:02 PM, #5
                RE: 420A vs 4g63, Dualgen2, Mar-30-03 06:25 AM, #6
                     RE: 420A vs 4g63, MR BLUNT 2gnt, Mar-30-03 05:18 PM, #7
                          RE: 420A vs 4g63, dmta02, Mar-30-03 07:54 PM, #8
                               RE: 420A vs 4g63, neovb, Mar-30-03 08:35 PM, #9
                                    RE: 420A vs 4g63, MR BLUNT 2gnt, Mar-31-03 05:33 AM, #10
                                         RE: 420A vs 4g63, Vandy420a, Mar-31-03 12:11 PM, #11
                                              RE: 420A vs 4g63, neovb, Mar-31-03 12:21 PM, #12
                                                   RE: 420A vs 4g63, dsmlights, Mar-31-03 03:06 PM, #13
RE: 420A vs 4g63, TeamXtremeRS, Mar-31-03 03:46 PM, #14
RE: 420A vs 4g63, 97eclipseRS, Apr-01-03 12:09 PM, #15
      RE: 420A vs 4g63, Remy, Apr-01-03 12:19 PM, #16

Top 2GNT Technical Turbo/Nitrous Tech topic #45779 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.047992944717407 seconds, executing 12 queries.