Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 2 Users in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine Engine Management Systems & Controllers topic #4803
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing)" This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
jamesmanJul-18-03 06:00 AM
Old School 2GNTer
1339 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#4821, "RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing)"
In response to In response to 17


          

I think you misunderstood what Vinnie said, he said that the way he is using it makes the unit not a "piggyback" type unit.
I think all the people using the e-manage have already used the afc and found its limitations and have moved on to bigger and better things, hence the e-manage. basically, the e-manage has more control and is overall a more high tech unit than the afc, I don't care what anyone says. But it all boils down to what the owner wants, if they want a basic piggyback and don't want to mess with it much then get an AFC, if you want more control and options for just a little more money then get the e-manage. for most the people on this board, I believe that the afc will suffice, its those who want more out of their unit that should buy the e-manage.

Lates
James

Rest In Peace Heidi Doggy

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy

E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? [View all] , solareclipse98, Mar-03-10 12:50 PM
  RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better?, Cereal5, Jul-15-03 01:19 PM, #1
RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better?, Toro Sentado, Jul-15-03 03:25 PM, #2
      RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better?, Moderatormicyek, Jul-15-03 04:56 PM, #3
      RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better?, Teamner947, Jul-15-03 05:00 PM, #4
           RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better?, Nitrous_RS1997, Jul-15-03 06:34 PM, #5
                RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better?, TeamMuRiX, Jul-16-03 01:23 AM, #6
                     RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better?, Cereal5, Jul-16-03 05:47 AM, #7
                     RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better?, jamesman, Jul-16-03 05:53 AM, #8
                          RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better?, Nitrous_RS1997, Jul-16-03 09:18 AM, #9
                               RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing), solareclipse98, Jul-16-03 12:00 PM, #10
                                    RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing), whodatt1, Jul-16-03 12:20 PM, #11
                                         RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing), solareclipse98, Jul-16-03 03:21 PM, #12
                                              RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing), TeamMuRiX, Jul-16-03 11:24 PM, #13
                                                   RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing), jamesman, Jul-17-03 02:01 PM, #14
                                                        RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing), Kiku, Jul-17-03 05:11 PM, #15
                                                             RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing), TeamMuRiX, Jul-17-03 11:45 PM, #16
                                                             RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing), Moderatormicyek, Jul-18-03 05:25 AM, #17
                                                                  RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing), jamesman, Jul-18-03 06:00 AM #18
                                                                       RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing), Moderatormicyek, Jul-18-03 06:32 AM, #19

Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine Engine Management Systems & Controllers topic #4803 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.015302181243896 seconds, executing 14 queries.