Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 0 Users in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine Engine Management Systems & Controllers topic #4803
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing)" This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
jamesmanJul-17-03 02:01 PM
Old School 2GNTer
1339 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#4817, "RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing)"
In response to In response to 13


          

WERD TO THAT x2 Chris

hehe
I am running a programmable dis2 with the e-manage. i amonly pulling out like 3 degrees at max boost max rpm.
In my opinion, the key is to get the mechanical FPR (SFMU) to do most of the fuel compensation. The key is to try to get a mechanically made fuel pressure curve to be as close to what you need and make minor adjustments with the piggyback. I am running like 15-17 psi fuel pressure at idle and am using a 6.5:1 disk with 440cc injectors. This is real close to the proper fuel i need. My emanage correction are no bigger than +- 10% this allows the timing to be minimally affected by correction. I think the biggest mistake people make when tuning is that the use the piggyback to pull out like 30 or 40% that is when timing gets all crazy.

Lates
James

Rest In Peace Heidi Doggy

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy

E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? [View all] , solareclipse98, Mar-03-10 12:50 PM
  RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better?, Cereal5, Jul-15-03 01:19 PM, #1
RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better?, Toro Sentado, Jul-15-03 03:25 PM, #2
      RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better?, Moderatormicyek, Jul-15-03 04:56 PM, #3
      RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better?, Teamner947, Jul-15-03 05:00 PM, #4
           RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better?, Nitrous_RS1997, Jul-15-03 06:34 PM, #5
                RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better?, TeamMuRiX, Jul-16-03 01:23 AM, #6
                     RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better?, Cereal5, Jul-16-03 05:47 AM, #7
                     RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better?, jamesman, Jul-16-03 05:53 AM, #8
                          RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better?, Nitrous_RS1997, Jul-16-03 09:18 AM, #9
                               RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing), solareclipse98, Jul-16-03 12:00 PM, #10
                                    RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing), whodatt1, Jul-16-03 12:20 PM, #11
                                         RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing), solareclipse98, Jul-16-03 03:21 PM, #12
                                              RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing), TeamMuRiX, Jul-16-03 11:24 PM, #13
                                                   RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing), jamesman, Jul-17-03 02:01 PM #14
                                                        RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing), Kiku, Jul-17-03 05:11 PM, #15
                                                             RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing), TeamMuRiX, Jul-17-03 11:45 PM, #16
                                                             RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing), Moderatormicyek, Jul-18-03 05:25 AM, #17
                                                                  RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing), jamesman, Jul-18-03 06:00 AM, #18
                                                                       RE: E-Manage Vs SAFC? What is better? (Timing), Moderatormicyek, Jul-18-03 06:32 AM, #19

Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine Engine Management Systems & Controllers topic #4803 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.015799045562744 seconds, executing 14 queries.