Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy 2 Users in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine Engine Management Systems & Controllers topic #2067
View in linear mode

Subject: "Portfueler fuel lines and software" Previous topic | Next topic
powelldsMay-15-06 09:03 PM
Member since Jul 06th 2003
916 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#2067, "Portfueler fuel lines and software"




          

Hey, I am about to order the portfueler from Hahn and just had a few questions. How does the Aeromotive 1:1 regulator go in? Do you take out your stock FPR? Also, what's the order of the fuel lines, does it go from the pump to the stock fuel rail, to the portfueler rail, then to the 1:1 and then return to the tank? Last, how easy is the software that comes with it to tune if you have a wideband O2? Thanks for any help.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Replies to this topic
RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software, PiKapp504, May-16-06 04:32 AM, #1
RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software, baxsom, May-18-06 04:33 PM, #2
      RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software, powellds, May-29-06 03:15 PM, #3
           RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software, baxsom, May-30-06 03:41 AM, #4
                RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software, powellds, May-30-06 02:35 PM, #5
                     RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software, Teamner947, May-30-06 05:10 PM, #6
                          RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software, baxsom, May-30-06 06:02 PM, #7
                               RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software, Teamner947, May-31-06 07:46 AM, #8
                               RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software, powellds, May-31-06 12:18 PM, #9
                                    RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software, Teamner947, May-31-06 04:31 PM, #10
                                         RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software, baxsom, Jun-01-06 05:08 AM, #11
                                              RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software, Teamner947, Jun-01-06 06:14 AM, #12
                                                   RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software, Keith2172, Jun-16-06 07:59 AM, #13
                                                        RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software, Ebster1085, Jun-17-09 11:04 AM, #14
                                                             RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software, 420agreenvilleSC, Jun-17-09 07:25 PM, #15

PiKapp504May-16-06 04:32 AM
Member since Feb 22nd 2002
290 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#2068, "RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software"
In response to Reply # 0


          

That is 100% correct on the fuel line setup. As for the software, I've never used it so I couldn't tell ya. Just to re-iterate, the fuel lines go like this: line up to OEM rail, line to PF rail, line to 1:1, line to return line.

96 Indy Red Dodge Avenger I4 5spd
225.7whp/227.2wtq @ 10psi, currently running 12-14psi.
HRC Stage III turbo setup
JE 8.8:1 pistons
Eagle rods
block bored .020" over
GReddy FMIC w/ custom piping
1G crushed BOV
SPEC Stage 3 clutch
2.5" DP, 2.5" high flow cat, 3" ERT catback w/ Magnaflow muffler and 3" tip.
much much more...

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
baxsomMay-18-06 04:33 PM
Member since Nov 27th 2004
758 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#2078, "RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software"
In response to Reply # 1




          

the fuel software is pretty easy
it helps to have a datalogger that will read boost, rpm and air fuel like the zeitronix because the fuel table is like a spreadsheet.

across the top is the boost level in .5 psi incriments
down the left is rpm in 500 rpm incriments

the boost sensor and tach sensor inside the PF module find the appropriate cell and turn on the injectors for the length of time based on the cells contents

you can adjust each cell + or - based on what your datalogger says for that given rpm and boost setting
or there is a select all function and you can adjust the entire map percentage wise.

My PF with the 440cc injectors came with a map that was 9:1 at 10psi
so tuning is a definite must



1996 eclipse GS-T
1968 Ford Mustang
2004 Suzuki GSXR600
2006 Honda CBR1000RR
Decisions Decisions

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
powelldsMay-29-06 03:15 PM
Member since Jul 06th 2003
916 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#2094, "RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software"
In response to Reply # 2




          

I am also going with the 440cc injectors from RC. I am getting the boost sensor for the Zeitronix as well, how long did it take you to tune your car once you got the portfueler installed? Thanks for the info bro!

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
baxsomMay-30-06 03:41 AM
Member since Nov 27th 2004
758 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#2096, "RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software"
In response to Reply # 3




          

All in all about a week total time to get something that didnt worry me.

The hard part was getting somewhere to do a hard pull to redline since the closet track is a long way off.

I started with taking away fuel across the board on both A and B maps using the select all and change by buttons and then doing a run.

Then I just kept doing that until I was in the 11's AFR across the board and then tweaked individual cells.



1996 eclipse GS-T
1968 Ford Mustang
2004 Suzuki GSXR600
2006 Honda CBR1000RR
Decisions Decisions

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
powelldsMay-30-06 02:35 PM
Member since Jul 06th 2003
916 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#2097, "RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software"
In response to Reply # 4




          

How long have you had the portfueler for??? Do you have to constantly keep retuning it? I live in a place where the temperature between night and day are pretty dramatic. Will I have problems with that? Thanks for all the info so far though.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
Teamner947May-30-06 05:10 PM
Donating 2GNT member
3168 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#2098, "RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software"
In response to Reply # 5




          

Originally posted by powellds
I live in a place where the temperature between night and day are pretty dramatic. Will I have problems with that?


Give it a try, the worst thing that can happen is that you will tune it well for the cold and it will be rich when it heats up.

or

Stick your big injectors in the primary rail (controlled by the stock ECU) and hook the stock ones up to the PF. You will have less error that way, in theory at least.


2016 WRX STi Limited (current)
2001 A4 1.8tqms (donated)
1991 GVR4 #1933 (sold)
old.dsmregistry.com/detail.php?carid=218 (dismantled)

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
baxsomMay-30-06 06:02 PM
Member since Nov 27th 2004
758 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#2099, "RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software"
In response to Reply # 6




          

The big injectors are too large to be controlled by the ecu. The standard is 440cc. It would run hella rich when not in boost.
Now I have read that its a good idea to put the stock injectors in the portfueler rail and the secondaries in the primary rail and switch the harnesses.



1996 eclipse GS-T
1968 Ford Mustang
2004 Suzuki GSXR600
2006 Honda CBR1000RR
Decisions Decisions

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
Teamner947May-31-06 07:46 AM
Donating 2GNT member
3168 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#2100, "RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software"
In response to Reply # 7




          

Originally posted by baxsom
hella


You mean "wicked"?


2016 WRX STi Limited (current)
2001 A4 1.8tqms (donated)
1991 GVR4 #1933 (sold)
old.dsmregistry.com/detail.php?carid=218 (dismantled)

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
powelldsMay-31-06 12:18 PM
Member since Jul 06th 2003
916 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#2102, "RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software"
In response to Reply # 7




          

Originally posted by baxsom
The big injectors are too large to be controlled by the ecu. The standard is 440cc. It would run hella rich when not in boost. Now I have read that its a good idea to put the stock injectors in the portfueler rail and the secondaries in the primary rail and switch the harnesses.


Why would this be better, just because of the position of the injectors for atomization maybe?? Just a guess.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
Teamner947May-31-06 04:31 PM
Donating 2GNT member
3168 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#2103, "RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software"
In response to Reply # 9
May-31-06 04:36 PM by ner947



          

The stock ECU is able to correct for air temperature, the PF, 034EIC, etc... doesn't.

Putting the injectors controlled by the ECU further from the cylinders could make the problem worse. It may have unpredictable results - the equilibrium between evaporation and condensation of fuel pooling on the intake tract will certainly be different than the ECU expects, it may be able to correct for this to some extent, or there may not be any noticeable difference at all. Experiment... see what works best for your setup.


2016 WRX STi Limited (current)
2001 A4 1.8tqms (donated)
1991 GVR4 #1933 (sold)
old.dsmregistry.com/detail.php?carid=218 (dismantled)

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
baxsomJun-01-06 05:08 AM
Member since Nov 27th 2004
758 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#2105, "RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software"
In response to Reply # 10
Jun-01-06 05:09 AM by baxsom



          

That is sorta the explanation that I was given for the reason to switch them. Putting the stock injectors in the PF rail places them closer to the head where they were originally while the secondaries are pushed back with the intake manifold.
However if you look at them once installed they sit pretty much directly on top of each other.

If I ever take my intake off again I am going to switch them back to normal and see if it makes a difference.



1996 eclipse GS-T
1968 Ford Mustang
2004 Suzuki GSXR600
2006 Honda CBR1000RR
Decisions Decisions

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                        
Teamner947Jun-01-06 06:14 AM
Donating 2GNT member
3168 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#2106, "RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software"
In response to Reply # 11




          

Duh... my mistake. I forgot that the PF rail is actually closer to the head. I was thinking of the old-school 8 injector method.


2016 WRX STi Limited (current)
2001 A4 1.8tqms (donated)
1991 GVR4 #1933 (sold)
old.dsmregistry.com/detail.php?carid=218 (dismantled)

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
Keith2172Jun-16-06 07:59 AM
Member since Jan 16th 2004
1281 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#2146, "RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software"
In response to Reply # 12


          

rather then move around the injectors, wouldn't it be faster/easier to just swap injector harnesses? I.E. the stock harness goes where the PF injectors are and the PF harness goes where the stock injectors are.

Representing the Central Cali chapter of 2GNT!
(I think I'm the only member )

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                
Ebster1085Jun-17-09 11:04 AM
Member since Jun 11th 2009
531 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#4536, "RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software"
In response to Reply # 13


          

Hi guys,

I know this is an old thread, but I am finishing up with my Portfueler installation and I am hoping to begin tuning it late this week into this weekend.

It seems like the consensus is that a good way to start is to do a 3rd gear pull and log air/fuel data, and then use the select all feature on the Portfueler, and take off fuel accross the board. Repeat this until I get to around 11 air/fuel ratio across the board and then tune individual cells from there.

My question is, every time I use select all and take off from all cells, how much do you recommend I take off each time?

Thanks,

1999 Eclipse GS
Built motor
Hahn 16G Turbo w/ FMIC
Hahn Stage 5 Portfueler (270's & 500's)
Zeitronix Zt-2 wideband w/ 3.5bar MAP
3" SS Turbo Back
CM Stage 4 Clutch and Fidanza Flywheel
Baer Big Brake Kit

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                    
420agreenvilleSCJun-17-09 07:25 PM
Donating 2GNT member
1527 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#4539, "RE: Portfueler fuel lines and software"
In response to Reply # 14




          

IIRC, i took off 5% each time.

___________________________________________



http://www.2gnt.com/quote_db.php?id=278

Outside of Corona: "That sucks, peace out..." (jamie walks away)... "Sweeet, what we doin?" -Zac
Tim's garage (prior to motor install): "Im gonna smoke real quick, that way if you fuck up I am already nicotined up" -Tim

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine Engine Management Systems & Controllers topic #2067 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.051008939743042 seconds, executing 14 queries.