Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 0 Users in Chat
Top 4G63 Technical 4G63 Tech topic #8059
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: 1G Head VS 2G Head differences, which is better for port/polish?" Previous topic | Next topic
420a-TnthewerksAug-11-05 08:50 PM
Member since Jun 11th 2004
2267 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#8065, "RE: 1G Head VS 2G Head differences, which is better for port/polish?"
In response to In response to 5




          

Originally posted by eclipzGST
Originally posted by NHH223 As for the topic of cams, I was thinking HKS, cuz they make some DAMN good parts.
yup, 272's
Originally posted by NHH223 And 97 rockers and lifters will eliminate my 95 lifter tick, correct?
Nope, you need the "revised" lifters. Just get new ones from mitsu. they'll be the right ones.
Originally posted by NHH223 Expected HP gains out of the built head alone... anyone?
JUST the head work? Probably not much if any. It will only flow as much air as is pushed through it. Throw a huge snail on there first and then you'll notice a before and after difference.


Damnit you made my post sound dumb after editing yours!!!!!!!!!

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

1G Head VS 2G Head differences, which is better for port/polish? [View all] , NHH223, Aug-11-05 10:49 AM
  RE: 1G Head VS 2G Head differences, which is better for port/polish?, Pitchblack98, Aug-11-05 11:16 AM, #1
RE: 1G Head VS 2G Head differences, which is better for port/polish?, NHH223, Aug-11-05 11:34 AM, #2
      RE: 1G Head VS 2G Head differences, which is better for port/polish?, TeamJeff_99gs, Aug-11-05 02:36 PM, #3
           RE: 1G Head VS 2G Head differences, which is better for port/polish?, NHH223, Aug-11-05 06:49 PM, #4
                RE: 1G Head VS 2G Head differences, which is better for port/polish?, ModeratoreclipzGST, Aug-11-05 08:44 PM, #5
                RE: 1G Head VS 2G Head differences, which is better for port/polish?, 420a-Tnthewerks, Aug-11-05 08:50 PM #7
                RE: 1G Head VS 2G Head differences, which is better for port/polish?, 420a-Tnthewerks, Aug-11-05 08:47 PM, #6
                     RE: 1G Head VS 2G Head differences, which is better for port/polish?, FlyinEsi, Aug-12-05 08:50 AM, #8
                          RE: 1G Head VS 2G Head differences, which is better for port/polish?, ModeratoreclipzGST, Aug-12-05 09:05 AM, #9
                               RE: 1G Head VS 2G Head differences, which is better for port/polish?, Remy, Aug-12-05 12:57 PM, #10
                                    RE: 1G Head VS 2G Head differences, which is better for port/polish?, NHH223, Aug-13-05 09:13 PM, #11
                                         RE: 1G Head VS 2G Head differences, which is better for port/polish?, 420a-Tnthewerks, Aug-14-05 09:52 AM, #12
                                              RE: 1G Head VS 2G Head differences, which is better for port/polish?, NHH223, Aug-14-05 03:29 PM, #13
                                                   RE: 1G Head VS 2G Head differences, which is better for port/polish?, 420a-Tnthewerks, Aug-14-05 04:01 PM, #14
                                                        RE: 1G Head VS 2G Head differences, which is better for port/polish?, NHH223, Aug-15-05 04:28 PM, #15
                                                             RE: 1G Head VS 2G Head differences, which is better for port/polish?, Remy, Aug-17-05 03:17 AM, #16
                                                                  RE: 1G Head VS 2G Head differences, which is better for port/polish?, BMPDirk, Aug-18-05 06:44 AM, #17

Top 4G63 Technical 4G63 Tech topic #8059 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.016800880432129 seconds, executing 12 queries.