1) I wasn't sure on the 80 gallon figure, was an guess based on what he was saying. 1600 seems a little more reasonable.

2) I'm not sure how he was going to keep his 2nd battery charged. Mentioned something about running a crossover cable between the two batteries, but even then like mentioned, you may need a high performance alternator. Strapping a tank of H2 in your trunk is dumb unless HIGHLY reinforced. You get rear ended and BOOM there goes you, your car and anything within a certain radius. With a water tank, the worst that can happen is a damaged electrolysis unit and/or damaged line, which even though in itself is dangerous if it is the carrier of a highly explosive gas, but not as bad as a tank sitting in your trunk that gets a pin-hole in it or a water leak with a little water damage. I'd take water damaged over an incinerated car any day.

3) By law of physics energy is consistent. Meaning energy cannot be created, nor destroyed...just transferred, which is what my buddy's system is doing. Transferring the energy from the electrolysis system to his fuel/intake system. That may have been a misconception on previous posts. People automatically assumed it was creating energy, which in itself IS physically impossible. But by transferring the energy makes it possible.

Still interesting though, I am really anxious to see if his design works and how well it works if so. Maybe if we can get some more examples of this being used with proof, people may begin to understand and we can all reach an agreement point on just how possible and what kind of gains are to be expected.

-Ben
Black 1999 RS

Basic mods and a South Bend OFE-SS Clutch
~150bhp.....for now!