Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 1 User in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine Real Racing topic #152
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????" Previous topic | Next topic
SaberKhanJan-29-02 08:26 AM
Old School 2GNTer
994 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#170, "RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????"
In response to In response to 17


          

Yeah, I dont think your average modded 2GNT would outrun an expertly driven GTS. As far as torque and Celicas, here's my 2 cents. Its not that they lack peak torque. Its where in the powerband the torque peaks at. If I'm not mistakened, its at something like 7200rpm I believe. Ours is 4k. 4k and below we are producing much more torque, which makes our cars easier to launch, and quicker off the line. Unless of course youre a professional drag racer who has alot of seat time in high revving small displacement engines with peaky power bands.


91 awd: 60-1, 880's, E-Prom, etc.
93 awd: JDM 6 bolt, K&N, full exhaust, Wally 255, otherwise stock.

R.I.P. the original "Factory Freak"
15.5's with short ram and catback only
1996 RS 5-speed

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000???? [View all] , flossinpnoyracer, Dec-20-01 12:05 PM
  RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, HadesOmega, Dec-20-01 12:24 PM, #1
RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, neovb, Dec-20-01 01:33 PM, #2
RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, flossinpnoyracer, Dec-20-01 01:43 PM, #3
RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, neovb, Dec-20-01 02:02 PM, #4
      RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, neovb, Dec-20-01 02:09 PM, #5
RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, Dave_FL, Dec-20-01 02:11 PM, #6
      RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, neovb, Dec-20-01 02:20 PM, #7
           RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, flossinpnoyracer, Dec-20-01 02:23 PM, #8
                RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, HadesOmega, Dec-20-01 04:19 PM, #9
                     RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, optimuspeterson, Dec-20-01 05:21 PM, #10
                          RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, ModeratorVX100, Dec-21-01 01:14 AM, #11
                               RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, ExcessTalonESi, Dec-21-01 10:01 AM, #12
                                    RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, ExcessTalonESi, Dec-21-01 10:02 AM, #13
                                    RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, 9D9 MITSU RS, Dec-21-01 08:08 PM, #14
                                    RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, ModeratorVX100, Dec-22-01 07:02 AM, #15
                                         RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, Amish_Eclipse, Dec-23-01 02:38 PM, #16
                                              RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, fasterGS, Jan-28-02 06:08 PM, #17
                                                   RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, SaberKhan, Jan-29-02 08:26 AM #18
                                                        RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, FuSi0N, Jan-29-02 08:33 AM, #19
                                                             RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, Dualgen2, Jan-30-02 01:19 AM, #20
                                                                  RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, ModeratorVX100, Jan-30-02 02:45 AM, #21
RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, EsiTalon96, Jan-30-02 03:16 PM, #22
RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, fasterGS, Jan-31-02 02:41 PM, #23
      RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, flossinpnoyracer, Feb-01-02 08:06 AM, #24
RE: 2gnt VS. CELICAS GT 2000????, Eclipse148cel, Feb-03-02 06:09 AM, #25

Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine Real Racing topic #152 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.022182941436768 seconds, executing 14 queries.