Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 3 Users in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Turbo/Nitrous Tech topic #109503
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: FMU vs FPR" Previous topic | Next topic
AdministratorCODE4Sep-19-12 06:27 AM
Member since Nov 23rd 2003
2552 posts, 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#109504, "RE: FMU vs FPR"
In response to In response to 0



          

Because the FMU you are speaking of is a rising rate regulator. It compensates for positive manifold pressure by dramatically increasing the rail pressure.

An adjustable FPR such as an aeromotive unit is not a rising rate and will not work in the application you are intending.

---

2012 2500HD LML

  
Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

FMU vs FPR [View all] , Rtistyk, Sep-18-12 08:11 PM
  RE: FMU vs FPR, AdministratorCODE4, Sep-19-12 06:27 AM #1
RE: FMU vs FPR, SilvrEclips, Sep-19-12 08:20 AM, #2
      RE: FMU vs FPR, Moderatorxcasbonx, Sep-19-12 10:58 AM, #3
           RE: FMU vs FPR, Rtistyk, Sep-19-12 06:02 PM, #4
                RE: FMU vs FPR, ez, Sep-19-12 08:33 PM, #5
                     RE: FMU vs FPR, eclipse420ags, Sep-20-12 05:33 AM, #6
                          RE: FMU vs FPR, JoshDSM, Sep-20-12 10:31 AM, #7
                               RE: FMU vs FPR, Rtistyk, Sep-20-12 05:09 PM, #8
                                    RE: FMU vs FPR, ez, Sep-21-12 12:01 AM, #9
                                         RE: FMU vs FPR, SilvrEclips, Sep-21-12 06:17 AM, #10
                                              RE: FMU vs FPR, Rtistyk, Sep-21-12 03:50 PM, #11

Top 2GNT Technical Turbo/Nitrous Tech topic #109503 Previous topic | Next topic
   

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.04157018661499 seconds, executing 12 queries.