|
Time for some math, kiddies!
If the air being taken into the turbo is at, say, 80 degrees farenheit (this is actually pretty reasonable for the underhood temperature of a moving car). This is 27 degrees celcius. That's 300 degrees kelvin.
Next scenario: you have air being taken into the turbo at 40 degrees farenheit, which is 4 degrees celcius. This is pretty reasonable for a cold air intake on a cold day, and it works out to 278 degrees kelvin.
Now, we can calculate the adiabatic heating, due to compression. going with the formula P1/T1 = P2/T2. We know that the starting pressure in the first engine is 14.7 PSI, and the starting temperature is 300 degrees kelvin. Say we boost to "15 psi," which is really 29.7 psi absolute. to best make this equation usable, let's use T2 = (P2 * T1) / P1. T2 = (29.7 * 300) / 14.7, so T2 = 606 degrees kelvin. Now, substitute the motor with the CAI's intake temperature, and the equation looks like (29.7 * 278) / 14.7 = T2. T2 is now equal to 561.67 degrees kelvin. This is a 7.3% difference in pre-intercooled intake temperature. Now, given it being 40 degrees outside (278 K), and having a decent FMIC with 80% efficiency, the after intercooler temperature for the first motor would be 343.6 degrees kelvin, and for the motor with the CAI 335 degrees kelvin. This is a 2.5% difference in after-intercooled intake temperature.
Hardly worth the effort to do a CAI, and less worthy of the math I just did. Plus, the reduction of partial pressure before the inducer would hurt power. This is a bit simplified, and one would need a compressor map and a lot more information to do the exact math, but I don't think that it would be worth the effort.
-=B-= Dude, Boeing called. They want their wing back.
Dark0ne95: There is a butthole on that girl that his going to feel the wrath of 23 yeras of worldwide hate. Me: Can I put that in my sig? Dark0ne95: GO right fucking ahead.
|