______________________________ If a sentence found online has 35% misspellings or greater and includes at least two racially charged expletives, chances are it is a YouTube comment.
'95 Eclipse TurboGS (garage deco) '95 TSi AWD (restoring a survivor) '97 Talon ESi-T (poor impulse control) '99 Eclipse RS-T (daily beater) '13 Evo X (mostly stock) '17 Sienna (Middle Aged Dad Mobile)
#22559, "RE: pocket logger gave me a PO106" In response to Reply # 5
Long time no post guys. It's funny that I logged on and found this post because I have the same dilema. I know that the AFC sets that code (61), but has anyone found a way around it yet? Up until now it hasn't been a problem, but now my state changed the emission test to strictly OBD-II style testing and if you have any CEL you fail. I can work around the AFC but then I don't think the ECU will be able to work with the 440's enough to pass the test. Any suggestions or help guys would be much appreciated. Thanks and hopefully now that I have my car back together I will be back on the board more often.
Yeah I got two tens in the back...two ten pound bottles!!!!
#22561, "RE: pocket logger gave me a PO106" In response to Reply # 0
a dead map sensor will do that. check your map readings on your datalogger.
A.D.P. "...If you do too much, people become dependant. If you do to little, people loose hope. If you do it right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all." bring it on............
A.D.P. "...If you do too much, people become dependant. If you do to little, people loose hope. If you do it right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all." bring it on...........