Welcome to the 2GNT Forum!
Home Site Background Info & Specs Mods & Tech Info CAPS Part Reviews Donate 2GNT Stickers
Search Printer-friendly copy 2 Users in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Interior/Exterior topic #103289
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: 2gnt Wheel Database Thread" Previous topic | Next topic
RoninEclipse2GApr-14-09 06:39 AM
Donating 2GNT member
2745 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#103289, "RE: 2gnt Wheel Database Thread"
Apr-10-09 05:16 PM by RoninEclipse2G



          

Originally posted by Warmage12
DriftZ GTR's Size: 17"x10" Weight: 20.0 lbs per wheel Offset: ??? Tire Info: 235/45ZR/17 Kumho off brand Color: Gloss black spokes with Stainless lip and Center http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m266/warmage12/016. jpg

no way those are 17x10. for your spacing the tires would be rubbing the knuckle upright like a mother.

the tire size suggests a 17x7/17x8 and by the look of the tires themselves and how they crown across the top I'd guess the 17x7

and yes I can gather that from one pic.

Erik P.
Official 2GNT thread Hijacker
Some say that he's driven over more Covenant than he's shot, and that his grenades aren't where you'd expect them to be...
All we know is, He's not The Stig... But he is The Stig's Spartan cousin!

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Replies to this topic
RE: 2gnt Wheel Database Thread, AdministratorCODE4, Apr-14-09 06:39 AM, #1
RE: 2gnt Wheel Database Thread, Moderatorteklein, Apr-14-09 06:43 AM, #2
      RE: 2gnt Wheel Database Thread, freelancefool, Apr-14-09 09:38 PM, #3
           RE: 2gnt Wheel Database Thread, PsychO, Apr-15-09 11:42 PM, #4
                RE: 2gnt Wheel Database Thread, freelancefool, Apr-16-09 04:27 AM, #5
                     RE: 2gnt Wheel Database Thread, PsychO, Apr-16-09 09:09 PM, #6
                     RE: 2gnt Wheel Database Thread, RoninEclipse2G, Apr-17-09 03:37 PM, #7

AdministratorCODE4Apr-14-09 06:39 AM
Member since Nov 23rd 2003
2552 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#103290, "RE: 2gnt Wheel Database Thread"
In response to Reply # 0




          

Agreed. 10" wide? I doubt that judging by their relationship to the fender well.

+1 on the recommended tire size.

---

2012 2500HD LML


  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ModeratortekleinApr-14-09 06:43 AM
Member since Nov 04th 2007
1699 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#103306, "RE: 2gnt Wheel Database Thread"
In response to Reply # 1


          

Split the topic, lost Warmages reply and Freelance's, sorry emoji

Ill try to fill in the details:

Basically Warmage posted a pic of his car, said the wheels were 10", Ronin and Code 4 said they werent.

Warmage responded that they were, except he is using RWD wheels so they stick out 1.5" on each side. Also posted pictures of his ability to use a ruler.

Freelancefool suggested the topics be split, and he was right.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
freelancefoolApr-14-09 09:38 PM
Donating 2GNT member
765 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#103309, "RE: 2gnt Wheel Database Thread"
In response to Reply # 2




          

I also suggested that to maintain the proper load on the bearings, for every 10mm increase in tire width, you decrease the offset by 5mm. This will move the tire further out from the car while still centering the load on the bearing.

IE. You have 215s and want to step up to a 245, so you go with a +27 offset.

If I am wrong about this, someone please correct me.

My Blog

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
PsychOApr-15-09 11:42 PM
Member since Jun 10th 2004
166 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#103310, "RE: 2gnt Wheel Database Thread"
In response to Reply # 3


          

Originally posted by freelancefool
I also suggested that to maintain the proper load on the bearings, for every 10mm increase in tire width, you decrease the offset by 5mm. This will move the tire further out from the car while still centering the load on the bearing. IE. You have 215s and want to step up to a 245, so you go with a +27 offset. If I am wrong about this, someone please correct me.


Actually, if you decreased the positive offset, it would push the rim out further from the hub so you would be putting more stress on the bearing. Say a 17x8 with a +30 offset will stick out further than a 17x8 with a +38 offset.

A 17x8 +38 will fit a 245/40 no problem in our wheel wells. You can acutally get it to tuck with some camber. If you were running +27 it would most definitely contact the fender while hitting a bump. You would need some high spring rates to prevent it.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
freelancefoolApr-16-09 04:27 AM
Donating 2GNT member
765 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#103311, "RE: 2gnt Wheel Database Thread"
In response to Reply # 4




          

But the theory behind decreasing the offset is that it will still have the same amount of backspacing since you have increased the overall width of the tire.

My Blog

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
PsychOApr-16-09 09:09 PM
Member since Jun 10th 2004
166 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#103312, "RE: 2gnt Wheel Database Thread"
In response to Reply # 5


          

You mean rim right? Not tire? Because your backspacing has nothing to do with the section width of the tire.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
RoninEclipse2GApr-17-09 03:37 PM
Donating 2GNT member
2745 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#103313, "RE: 2gnt Wheel Database Thread"
In response to Reply # 5




          

Originally posted by freelancefool
But the theory behind decreasing the offset is that it will still have the same amount of backspacing since you have increased the overall width of the tire.


yes, but it puts the center of the load farther out, thus increasing the stress on the bearing. If our cars used a spindle and multiple bearing setup it wouldn't be a big deal because there's 2 bearings to split the load. unfortunately we have a single bearing setup that is very susceptable to failure because of changing stress loads.

Erik P.
Official 2GNT thread Hijacker
Some say that he's driven over more Covenant than he's shot, and that his grenades aren't where you'd expect them to be...
All we know is, He's not The Stig... But he is The Stig's Spartan cousin!

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top 2GNT Technical Interior/Exterior topic #103289 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 2.2
Copyright 1997-2005 DCScripts.com, Copyright 2005-2026 2gnt.com
Generated in 0.048 seconds, executing 28 queries.