Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy 1 User in Chat
Top 4G63 Technical 4G63 Tech topic #6815
View in linear mode

Subject: "new setup" Previous topic | Next topic
kelvinb1Apr-22-07 06:00 AM
Member since Apr 06th 2004
1543 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#6815, "new setup"




          

so now that i have some money to play with, ive decided to build a 2.3 stroker. heres the basics

2.3 stroker
borg warner s366
je pistons
oliver rods
brian crower 280 cams
ferrea double valve springs and Retainers
mitsu hg
king bearings
arp main studs/connecting rods/head studs
shep stage 4/dog box - still deciding
ptt twin disc clutch
1600cc fuel injector clinic
aeromotive a1000 pump
megasquirt and spark


still deciding on what pistons to use, other then that, this is my setup. any thoughts/changes?

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Replies to this topic
RE: new setup, RST95eclipse, Apr-24-07 08:11 PM, #1
RE: new setup, kelvinb1, May-03-07 03:49 PM, #2
RE: new setup, MFGRacing90GSX, May-04-07 04:50 AM, #3
      RE: new setup, kelvinb1, May-04-07 05:02 PM, #4
      RE: new setup, MFGRacing90GSX, May-04-07 06:39 PM, #5
           RE: new setup, hookduphatch, May-04-07 09:30 PM, #6
      RE: new setup, RST95eclipse, May-07-07 04:43 PM, #7
           RE: new setup, kelvinb1, May-08-07 05:48 PM, #8
           RE: new setup, hookduphatch, May-09-07 01:37 AM, #9
                RE: new setup, kelvinb1, May-09-07 05:21 PM, #10
                     RE: new setup, kelvinb1, May-17-07 06:12 PM, #11
           RE: new setup, MFGRacing90GSX, May-18-07 12:32 PM, #12
                RE: new setup, kelvinb1, May-18-07 05:19 PM, #13
                     RE: new setup, MFGRacing90GSX, May-18-07 05:58 PM, #14
                          RE: new setup, kelvinb1, May-18-07 07:54 PM, #15
                          RE: new setup, MFGRacing90GSX, May-19-07 08:51 AM, #16
                          RE: new setup, Moderatorbullettdsm, May-20-07 01:46 AM, #18
                          RE: new setup, hookduphatch, May-20-07 12:32 AM, #17
                               RE: new setup, kelvinb1, May-22-07 05:08 PM, #19

RST95eclipseApr-24-07 08:11 PM
Member since Oct 19th 2004
403 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#6816, "RE: new setup"
In response to Reply # 0


          

I must question your setup.

-Why JE pistons? Ross and Wiseco have better reviews.
-Ferrea Duals? Kiggly has a beehive valve with less mass and just as much pressure.
-I'd rather go with a Cometic, since their specialty for DSMs is the 2.3 gasket. OEM MLS will do, but I have heard more and more failing.
-If you want the head not to raise, torque them to 100ft/lbs or look into A1 studs, which might be backordered.

The setup will make a ton of power. It will be an impressive machine. However, I would have gone the 2.0 route and rev'd to the moon, since that's where all the power will be.

For your cams, take a look in the marketplace. I might have something for you.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
kelvinb1May-03-07 03:49 PM
Member since Apr 06th 2004
1543 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#6817, "RE: new setup"
In response to Reply # 1




          

Originally posted by RST95eclipse
I must question your setup. -Why JE pistons? Ross and Wiseco have better reviews. -Ferrea Duals? Kiggly has a beehive valve with less mass and just as much pressure. -I'd rather go with a Cometic, since their specialty for DSMs is the 2.3 gasket. OEM MLS will do, but I have heard more and more failing. -If you want the head not to raise, torque them to 100ft/lbs or look into A1 studs, which might be backordered. The setup will make a ton of power. It will be an impressive machine. However, I would have gone the 2.0 route and rev'd to the moon, since that's where all the power will be. For your cams, take a look in the marketplace. I might have something for you.


im still debating on the setup. i was going to go with je pistons because of the price so far. its affordable and ive found them in the stroker +.040 setup.

valvetrain i want something that will take some hi revs...like 8-9k. ive read alittle (very little) and seen these could take it.

im going with the oem mls hg over the cometic because it will also be seeing outrageous pressure, 40psi boost....the turbo flows around 80lbs a minute.

cams i dont know for sure....still looking.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
MFGRacing90GSXMay-04-07 04:50 AM
Member since Oct 14th 2005
86 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#6818, "RE: new setup"
In response to Reply # 1


          

ARP specs are fine, they have many proven years. Remember you have an ALUMINUM head, there's not need to torque the studs down ANY more than 5ft lbs over spec. When doing so you risk damaging the heads surface. When ARP recommends a torque spec it is usually good to stick with that.


Originally posted by RST95eclipse
-If you want the head not to raise, torque them to 100ft/lbs or look into A1 studs, which might be backordered.


Matt
MFG Racing

http://dsmregistry.com/detail.php?carid=1310

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
kelvinb1May-04-07 05:02 PM
Member since Apr 06th 2004
1543 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#6819, "RE: new setup"
In response to Reply # 3




          

i just ordered my je 40 over stroker pistons. next will be the oliver rods and king bearings. after that the t4 s366. what do you reccomend for a manifold?

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
MFGRacing90GSXMay-04-07 06:39 PM
Member since Oct 14th 2005
86 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#6820, "RE: new setup"
In response to Reply # 4


          

Call up DNP I am sure they can help you out...

Matt
MFG Racing

http://dsmregistry.com/detail.php?carid=1310

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
hookduphatchMay-04-07 09:30 PM
Member since Jul 10th 2004
552 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#6821, "RE: new setup"
In response to Reply # 5




          

DO NOT get a dnp manifold.

Get in touch with either shearer performance or punishment racing. Lifetime warranties on their manifolds against cracks and you don't have to go through a vendor to get it. I GUARANTEE you'll be much happier going that route.



95 Eclipse RS - Sold and In Montana Now
Project 95 GSX - In Full swing.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
RST95eclipseMay-07-07 04:43 PM
Member since Oct 19th 2004
403 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#6822, "RE: new setup"
In response to Reply # 3


          

Originally posted by MFGRacing90GSXARP specs are fine, they have many proven years. Remember you have an ALUMINUM head, there's not need to torque the studs down ANY more than 5ft lbs over spec. When doing so you risk damaging the heads surface. When ARP recommends a torque spec it is usually good to stick with that.


It's been common practice to torque them from 90-100ft/lbs. The 70-75ft/lbs is what OEM calls for. How would you risk damaging the head's surface if you wrench them down in the proper order while working your way up? He's running a lot of boost - causes heads to raise. This isn't a 16g!!

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
kelvinb1May-08-07 05:48 PM
Member since Apr 06th 2004
1543 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#6823, "RE: new setup"
In response to Reply # 7




          

decided to go with a t67 instead. still 800hp

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
hookduphatchMay-09-07 01:37 AM
Member since Jul 10th 2004
552 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#6824, "RE: new setup"
In response to Reply # 8




          

have you looked into the sce ics titan copper head gaskets yet? they're nice. You also might want to look into oringing the head and/or deck to make sure you keep seal under 40 psi boost. how many pounds/min does the turbo you decided to go with flow?



95 Eclipse RS - Sold and In Montana Now
Project 95 GSX - In Full swing.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
kelvinb1May-09-07 05:21 PM
Member since Apr 06th 2004
1543 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#6825, "RE: new setup"
In response to Reply # 9




          

i was thinking still using mitsu headgasket. flows 80lbs a minute....will see around 40psi. a friend locally (roo on tuners) dynod around 560hp and has had problems with his titan gasket.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
kelvinb1May-17-07 06:12 PM
Member since Apr 06th 2004
1543 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#6826, "RE: new setup"
In response to Reply # 10




          



  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
MFGRacing90GSXMay-18-07 12:32 PM
Member since Oct 14th 2005
86 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#6827, "RE: new setup"
In response to Reply # 7


          

I Know this, However a guy in our team has had 30+ years of experience with cyl heads/ engines. Him, also me, have seen MANY times a ALUMINUM head being damaged do to being over torqued. We have built many engines. we also have many project cars with 14b's to 42R's 10psi to 50psi. I am giving this as advice and experience for you to take however you will.....


Originally posted by RST95eclipse
Originally posted by MFGRacing90GSXARP specs are fine, they have many proven years. Remember you have an ALUMINUM head, there's not need to torque the studs down ANY more than 5ft lbs over spec. When doing so you risk damaging the heads surface. When ARP recommends a torque spec it is usually good to stick with that.
It's been common practice to torque them from 90-100ft/lbs. The 70-75ft/lbs is what OEM calls for. How would you risk damaging the head's surface if you wrench them down in the proper order while working your way up? He's running a lot of boost - causes heads to raise. This isn't a 16g!!


Matt
MFG Racing

http://dsmregistry.com/detail.php?carid=1310

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
kelvinb1May-18-07 05:19 PM
Member since Apr 06th 2004
1543 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#6828, "RE: new setup"
In response to Reply # 12




          

so what do you think of the stock gasket holding 40psi?

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
MFGRacing90GSXMay-18-07 05:58 PM
Member since Oct 14th 2005
86 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#6829, "RE: new setup"
In response to Reply # 13


          

In our experiences we have used the stock fel-pro head gasket you can buy at places as cheap as autozone. The gasket combined with a "o-ringed" head has held ballpark 45psi or so on a larger frame turbocharger. We personally use filled o-rings on some of our engines.
I have a Cometic HP head gasket on one of my own cars, & it see's 35+ psi. If you want to hear it from companies that specialize in 4G63's & such, call up Bushur Racing I am sure they have alot of experience. building the badass motors they do..... All I can tell you is from my experiences just like everyone else.

Matt
MFG Racing

http://dsmregistry.com/detail.php?carid=1310

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
kelvinb1May-18-07 07:54 PM
Member since Apr 06th 2004
1543 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#6830, "RE: new setup"
In response to Reply # 14




          

well so far i have decided on this t67...around 40psi/80lbs per minute. stock head gasket also. heres my new mess

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
MFGRacing90GSXMay-19-07 08:51 AM
Member since Oct 14th 2005
86 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#6831, "RE: new setup"
In response to Reply # 15


          

Nice... Looks like you have your hands full, we have a few of those... lol... Good Luck..

Matt
MFG Racing

http://dsmregistry.com/detail.php?carid=1310

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
ModeratorbullettdsmMay-20-07 01:46 AM
Donating 2GNT member
2676 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#6832, "RE: new setup"
In response to Reply # 15


          

Originally posted by kelvinb1
well so far i have decided on this t67...around 40psi/80lbs per minute. stock head gasket also. heres my new mess


So is that Heineken there as an incentive? Get through that wiring and you get the "Heiney"? Heh heh, love those wiring jobs

Captain Caveman

96 RS Turbo 11.414 @ 119.62 MSNS, Crower 2 NA cams, BW366, 10.5 comp, UDP, 60mm TB, W/A intercooler, 3.55 tranny 567.9whp 430tq
97 RS NA 13.188 @ 103.87 MSnS powered 12.5 comp, Crower 3's and 219.4whp with 175tq
98 RS DD 12.5 comp on stock ECU, LTH, Crower 2's, Koni, GC, Hypercoil, DG hats
99 OZ 5sp Stocker 15.856 @ 85.97
99 GS stocker auto 17.7@77mph!

wiki home page:http://www.2gnt.com/index.php?d=bullettdsm

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
hookduphatchMay-20-07 12:32 AM
Member since Jul 10th 2004
552 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#6833, "RE: new setup"
In response to Reply # 14




          

Originally posted by MFGRacing90GSX
In our experiences we have used the stock fel-pro head gasket you can buy at places as cheap as autozone. The gasket combined with a "o-ringed" head has held ballpark 45psi or so on a larger frame turbocharger. We personally use filled o-rings on some of our engines. I have a Cometic HP head gasket on one of my own cars, & it see's 35+ psi. If you want to hear it from companies that specialize in 4G63's & such, call up Bushur Racing I am sure they have alot of experience. building the badass motors they do..... All I can tell you is from my experiences just like everyone else.


the sce ics titan copper headgasket also gets reallly good reviews. it's what i'm using on the motor i'm building for 500+ awhp.



95 Eclipse RS - Sold and In Montana Now
Project 95 GSX - In Full swing.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
kelvinb1May-22-07 05:08 PM
Member since Apr 06th 2004
1543 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#6834, "RE: new setup"
In response to Reply # 17




          

finally!!!!!!!

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top 4G63 Technical 4G63 Tech topic #6815 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.070149183273315 seconds, executing 12 queries.