Ummm. I'll take two please.

http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-will-debut-in-geneva/

____________________________________________________
four nails four corners four riders and four horses

If a Viper and an S2000 had a baby, that would be it. i like it

It reminds me of a Catfish.

Chris
---------------------------------------

98 Eclipse GS 5 spd- sold
95 Camaro Z28
64.5 Mustang 302 3spd

1998 Eclipse GS

GS-T Axleback|CAI|OBX 4-1 Header|AF/X UDP|

1991 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX - SOLD
2006 Mustang GT Convertible

sooo... the paint code on that is "demon piss yellow" or what? why yellow? not too sure how i feel about it yet. rear kinda has a 350z kinda look to it.. eh...

RIP- Rustbucket 1995-2009

‹hazardeclipse› by the way youre thinking of hazard_eclipse
‹hazardeclipse› thats not my fucking car
‹teklein› Oh yeah
‹hazardeclipse› he stole my name
‹hazardeclipse› fuck that radioactive yellow shit
‹teklein› Hazard_eclipse is the homo.

I contributed to the Wiki!
EVO IX - just a really expensive boost gauge and a K&N air filter
96 Eclipse RS -awaiting registration and inspection
95 Eclipse GS - parts car
Mods/Profile - http://www.2gnt.com/index.php?d=cs82685

I love it.

But um... how do you open the hood? It's body molded to the fenders and around the headlights. Corvette style maybe?

And then there's the 2.4 World engine, ok rawk. 6-speed tranny, ok maybe. Rear wheel drive?! WTF I wasn't aware mopar had a 6spd RWD tranny platform?

I wonder who's going to be the first magazine writer pussy to complain it isn't 6cyl "like its 350z competitor"? lawl
Edit: jalopnik.com/cars/geneva-motor-show/geneva-preshow-dodges-demonic-concept-car-235727.php

2.4L Turbo World Engine with a 2600lbs curb weight. Sign me up for a new one for each day of the week.

_______

BPU'd skittle

Yeah, this thing is extremely sexy.

____________________________________________________
four nails four corners four riders and four horses

It's not april first....un less all of you are actually being serious that you like it... *barf*


http://talontimes.blogspot.com


99GS
95TSI

T'would be positively sinister in black. I'd hit it. I'd hit it real hard.

looks like an americanized z3 imo

-matt

97 Eclipse GS-T with 6-bolt engine

That thing is FUGLY!!!

Jonathan
95 Eclipse GS
8 injector
Hahn Stage 3.5
Howell 2.2L Stroker

T O T A L L E D, T H A N K S T O S O M E A S S H A T!!!!!!!!!!!!

Don't sell your car to 16 year olds...

95 Eclipse RS - Sold for 6k, totalled three days later
91 Dodge Stealth R/T TT - 3" exhaust w/ no cats, eurethane motor mounts, 300M unbreakable output shaft, kevlar faced clutch, turbo XS BOV, 99 3000gt front conversion, carbon fiber hood. Dyno'd at 386hp. - SOLD! for 5k
98 Dodge Ram 1500 Club Cab 4x4 black on black.

Not the Demon, but the 2002 Razor concept...



mMMMmmmmm sideways 420a.

Is it just me, or does this seem to be a direct make off of the Crossfire?... only better of course.
Either way, there would be some nice competition between that and the Solstice GTP/ Saturn Sky.

--------------------------------------
Santiago
boosted 420a...(2.2l v8 eater)
02 WRX
95 T/A 383ci
03 Harley XL 92ci w/ NOS

Seems confused. Part Crossfire, part Dodge Ram, part Z4, part 350z, all ugly. It doesn't flow well at all. Try again please.

Greg

'19 Genesis G70 3.3t AWD
'88 Chrysler Conquest TSI

Who cares if it's ugly? They make body kits for that sort of thing if you're hung up on looks. Look at the Solstice, its an ugly piece of shit, and underpowered as hell. Not to mention made by GM.


Here, we have a 420a-ish powered, possibly turbo, RWD, 6spd, SPORTS CAR built by a decent manufacturer. Who CARES what it looks like?! Complaining about looks and lines gets you a fatass Evo X. Knock it off.

I like it. it'll never see the light of day, though. None of the good ones ever do.

______________________________
If a sentence found online has 35% misspellings or greater and includes at least two racially charged expletives, chances are it is a YouTube comment.

'95 Eclipse TurboGS (garage deco)
'95 TSi AWD (restoring a survivor)
'97 Talon ESi-T (poor impulse control)
'99 Eclipse RS-T (daily beater)
'13 Evo X (mostly stock)
'17 Sienna (Middle Aged Dad Mobile)



Factory Service Manuals: http://nawdu.de/files/

Doesn't do a thing for me, sorry. If they clean up the thing for production it might end up all right, but as it sits there are way too many design elements present and they don't flow together IMO. You like it, pony up and buy one.

Greg

'19 Genesis G70 3.3t AWD
'88 Chrysler Conquest TSI

Be honest, when was the last time you went into a car dealership and asked to see a car with lots of "design elements"?

I dunno, a car is transportation and maybe entertainment, not art. You want art on top of performance then hang it on your wall.



The funniest thing about picking a car on its looks is this Lambo was probably acclaimed worldwide as the most beautiful car with the most intricate lines, and perfection of design elements never before thought possible in a car. But since it's 20 years old and we've seen it on countless posters, it's now considered "outmoded, ugly, garish, and too complicated".

So, what's the difference between consumers and enthusiasts?

And remember, 10 years ago the DSM was bashed by every consumer car magazine for having "too much understeer", "rediculous torque steer", "spacecraft looks", "impractical", "poor gas mileage" etc. etc. etc. So the car got replaced by the 3G, which is what the manufacturers, as best as they could tell, was what consumers wanted. A stable, controlled, good looking, V-6 powered car, with geomechanical design elements.

naaaa....

__________________________________________________________
-Tony <--- NOT asian.
'06 Wicked White EVO IX