i was looking up some specs on my 97 5speed avenger and i saw that they said the drag coefficent is .36. im wondering if thats good or not. i remember alot of people talking about the eclipse has good drag coefficient but im wondering about my avenger
#17783, "RE: is a drag coefficient of .36 good" In response to Reply # 0
Well, to put it in perspective, the '95-'96 has a CoD of .28, and the '97-'99 has a CoD of .29. The newest Vettes have a CoD of .28, and the C4 had a .32. Just to put things in perspective. It's not a bad number, though. -=B-=
Dude, Boeing called. They want their wing back.
Dark0ne95: There is a butthole on that girl that his going to feel the wrath of 23 yeras of worldwide hate. Me: Can I put that in my sig? Dark0ne95: GO right fucking ahead.
#17798, "RE: is a drag coefficient of .36 good" In response to Reply # 2
I can't think of any DSM body kits that would lower the coeffecient of drag, and the A/S aftermarket bumper selection is more limited. I am not sure how much it can be nudged down without welding in the radiator support, fenders, hood, and bumper of a 2G DSM... But then again, what would be the point? -=B-=
Dude, Boeing called. They want their wing back.
Dark0ne95: There is a butthole on that girl that his going to feel the wrath of 23 yeras of worldwide hate. Me: Can I put that in my sig? Dark0ne95: GO right fucking ahead.
#17850, "RE: is a drag coefficient of .36 good" In response to Reply # 6
I would guess body kits add drag because lots of them have built in spoilers and stuff on them. Not to mention some have ducts that go absolutely nowhere. 95-96 might have better cod but they do crap for cooling and downforce. I know that personally hehe....
http://www.hadesomega.info -car specz and movies 95 Eclipse RS | 76' 280Z | 89' MR2 | 99 Neon | 91 Zephyr Who sez FF can't drift?