Welcome to the 2GNT Forum!
Home Site Background Info & Specs Mods & Tech Info CAPS Part Reviews Donate 2GNT Stickers
Search Printer-friendly copy 1 User in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine topic #90501
View in linear mode

Subject: "is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?" Previous topic | Next topic
ModeratormicyekJun-13-05 09:34 AM
Donating 2GNT member
5070 posts, 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#90501, "is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?"


          

I was woundering this the other day. 2.4 block with SRT-4 pistons and rods, stock 2.0 head. And just so I learn something today. What is the stroke, length of the rods and the distance from the wrist pin to the top of the piston? Also the valve lift...distance travled...whatever the valves stick down into the cylinder. Basically so I can do the math myself. I know...I should know all this stuff before I bought the shit and had it assembled...just going off what other people have said/done. But it's never to late to learn...right?

getty up

-kent-




'98 Talon...gone, but not forgotten

  
Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Replies to this topic
RE: is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?, 96eclipse2nr, Jun-13-05 10:37 AM, #1
RE: is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?, Moderatormicyek, Jun-13-05 12:27 PM, #2
      RE: is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?, 96eclipse2nr, Jun-13-05 05:58 PM, #3
           RE: is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?, totaleklipse97, Jun-13-05 06:04 PM, #4
                RE: is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?, Moderatormicyek, Jun-14-05 01:57 AM, #5
                     RE: is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?, Ducking_Fumbass, Jun-14-05 05:35 AM, #6
                          RE: is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?, Moderatormicyek, Jun-15-05 02:05 AM, #7
                               RE: is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?, Ducking_Fumbass, Jun-15-05 06:03 AM, #8
                                    RE: is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?, totaleklipse97, Jun-15-05 05:30 PM, #9
                                         RE: is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?, Moderatormicyek, Jun-16-05 02:48 AM, #10

96eclipse2nrJun-13-05 10:37 AM
Donating 2GNT member
3605 posts, 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#90502, "RE: is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?"
In response to Reply # 0

          

well, i went to neons.org and it says that the 2.4 is NON interference....but it just said that for the SOHC. of you slap on our 2gnt heads....i honestly dunno. id assume that it still would be non interference emoji but dont quote me on that

-----------------------------------------
2011 Nissan Xterra Pro-4x

2007 Kawasaki Ninja 650R

1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse RS-NX 75 shot, AEM CAI, P&P t/b and intake mani-SOLD

1964 Buick Electra 225-all original, all power options, 325hp, 445ft/lbs tq

  
Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ModeratormicyekJun-13-05 12:27 PM
Donating 2GNT member
5070 posts, 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#90508, "RE: is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?"
In response to Reply # 1

          

mmm...thanx for your input. I'd still like to know for sure emoji anyone else?

getty up

-kent-




'98 Talon...gone, but not forgotten

  
Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
96eclipse2nrJun-13-05 05:58 PM
Donating 2GNT member
3605 posts, 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#90518, "RE: is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?"
In response to Reply # 2

          

hmm, well i wonder...is it the HEAD or the BLOCK that determines wheather a motor is interference or not? i know it all has to do with the tollerences and overlap...but which has more pull in that?

i know its another set of questions in the thread...and not trying to hijack..but would be usefull info for me and anyone else wanting to know...and also you mikey

-----------------------------------------
2011 Nissan Xterra Pro-4x

2007 Kawasaki Ninja 650R

1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse RS-NX 75 shot, AEM CAI, P&P t/b and intake mani-SOLD

1964 Buick Electra 225-all original, all power options, 325hp, 445ft/lbs tq

  
Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
totaleklipse97Jun-13-05 06:04 PM
Member since May 15th 2003
3589 posts, 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#90519, "RE: is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?"
In response to Reply # 3



          

with the information at allpar you could prolly figure it out
http://www.allpar.com/mopar/24.html
im way to lazy right now to actually think about it.

-----------------------------------

My DSM registry.......Powered By Exile Racing
VW= The joy of driving
DSM= The frustration of fixing

The wonders of 2gnt chat:

‹totaleklipse97› so what benefits do i get from being ur e-boyfriend
‹Jen› uh... the honor?
‹totaleklipse97› somehow i guess i got that title now
‹Jen› somehow.....

  
Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
ModeratormicyekJun-14-05 01:57 AM
Donating 2GNT member
5070 posts, 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#90526, "RE: is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?"
In response to Reply # 4

          

Originally posted by totaleklipse97
im way to lazy right now to actually think about it.


gee thanx emoji

getty up

-kent-




'98 Talon...gone, but not forgotten

  
Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
Ducking_FumbassJun-14-05 05:35 AM
Member since Aug 30th 2004
1147 posts, 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#90527, "RE: is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?"
In response to Reply # 5

          

With SRT pistons turned around, it is non-interference.

  
Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
ModeratormicyekJun-15-05 02:05 AM
Donating 2GNT member
5070 posts, 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#90560, "RE: is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?"
In response to Reply # 6

          

Originally posted by Ducking_Fumbass
With SRT pistons turned around, it is non-interference.


Thanx..I was actually hoping you would respond...but I was looking forward to something a bit more colorful emoji and possibly more in depth.

getty up

-kent-




'98 Talon...gone, but not forgotten

  
Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
Ducking_FumbassJun-15-05 06:03 AM
Member since Aug 30th 2004
1147 posts, 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#90561, "RE: is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?"
In response to Reply # 7

          

Alright, because I broke the unclefucking pin on the intake cam, I discovered that the son-of-a-bitch 2.4, with SRT pistons turned around, is non-interference.

Is that better? emoji

  
Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
totaleklipse97Jun-15-05 05:30 PM
Member since May 15th 2003
3589 posts, 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#90596, "RE: is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?"
In response to Reply # 8



          

Originally posted by Ducking_Fumbass
Alright, because I broke the unclefucking pin on the intake cam, I discovered that the son-of-a-bitch 2.4, with SRT pistons turned around, is non-interference. Is that better? emoji


that's more fucking like it man!! exactly what he wanted im sure haha

-----------------------------------

My DSM registry.......Powered By Exile Racing
VW= The joy of driving
DSM= The frustration of fixing

The wonders of 2gnt chat:

‹totaleklipse97› so what benefits do i get from being ur e-boyfriend
‹Jen› uh... the honor?
‹totaleklipse97› somehow i guess i got that title now
‹Jen› somehow.....

  
Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
ModeratormicyekJun-16-05 02:48 AM
Donating 2GNT member
5070 posts, 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#90604, "RE: is my 2.4 still an interferance engine?"
In response to Reply # 9

          

yes it was...LOL

getty up

-kent-




'98 Talon...gone, but not forgotten

  
Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine topic #90501 Previous topic | Next topic
   

Powered by DCForum+ Version 2.2
Copyright 1997-2005 DCScripts.com, Copyright 2005-2026 2gnt.com
Generated in 0.068 seconds, executing 34 queries.