Welcome to the 2GNT Forum!
Home Site Background Info & Specs Mods & Tech Info CAPS Part Reviews Donate 2GNT Stickers
Search Printer-friendly copy 0 Users in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine topic #62007
View in linear mode

Subject: "Stroker kit vs Head Work" Previous topic | Next topic
rhuiOct-23-03 08:57 AM
Member since Apr 06th 2002
262 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62007, "Stroker kit vs Head Work"


          

I'm trying to decide which route to take... just wanna get your guys' opinions.
Which route should I take for turboing my 420A 2.0L with a T3/T4?

rebuild bottom end with stronger internals and try to make it rev hi later?

or

2.4L Stroker
What's the pro's and con's? Will my tranny suffer with the stroker?

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Replies to this topic

JWoodleyOct-23-03 09:19 AM
Member since Mar 27th 2003
2335 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62008, "RE: Stroker kit vs Head Work"
In response to Reply # 0




          

i'd probably just build my stock bottom end and throw on some nice cams w/ cam gears. goodluck.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

alain95i4Oct-23-03 09:33 AM
Member since Jan 28th 2002
794 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62009, "RE: Stroker kit vs Head Work"
In response to Reply # 0


          

Originally posted by rhui
rebuild bottom end with stronger internals and try to make it rev hi later? or 2.4L Stroker What's the pro's and con's? Will my tranny suffer with the stroker?


2.4 stroker ?
the only 2.4 is the Chrysler 2.4 engine which is swappable with lots of works, not a direct fit but still doable
there are 2.2 stoker kits, displacing around 2.150L actually and since it's a custom system they are come with custom internals

stroker don't hurt tranny, stroker don't even like to rev as hard as as a normal displacement engine

Alain

one of the 2.4 true pionners

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
KidEvoOct-23-03 08:00 PM
Member since Jan 23rd 2003
161 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62039, "RE: Stroker kit vs Head Work"
In response to Reply # 2


          

you can stroke a 2.0 to 2.2L
you can stroke a 2.4 to 2.6L

the 420a head flows pretty well stock
(designed by Lotus)


  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine topic #62007 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 2.2
Copyright 1997-2005 DCScripts.com, Copyright 2005-2026 2gnt.com
Generated in 0.077 seconds, executing 20 queries.