Go back to previous topic
Forum namePerformance/Engine
Topic subjectStroker kit vs Head Work
Topic URLhttps://forums.2gnt.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=i5&topic_id=62007
62007, Stroker kit vs Head Work
Posted by rhui, Oct-23-03 08:57 AM
I'm trying to decide which route to take... just wanna get your guys' opinions.
Which route should I take for turboing my 420A 2.0L with a T3/T4?

rebuild bottom end with stronger internals and try to make it rev hi later?

or

2.4L Stroker
What's the pro's and con's? Will my tranny suffer with the stroker?
62008, RE: Stroker kit vs Head Work
Posted by JWoodley, Oct-23-03 09:19 AM
i'd probably just build my stock bottom end and throw on some nice cams w/ cam gears. goodluck.
62009, RE: Stroker kit vs Head Work
Posted by alain95i4, Oct-23-03 09:33 AM
Originally posted by rhui
rebuild bottom end with stronger internals and try to make it rev hi later? or 2.4L Stroker What's the pro's and con's? Will my tranny suffer with the stroker?


2.4 stroker ?
the only 2.4 is the Chrysler 2.4 engine which is swappable with lots of works, not a direct fit but still doable
there are 2.2 stoker kits, displacing around 2.150L actually and since it's a custom system they are come with custom internals

stroker don't hurt tranny, stroker don't even like to rev as hard as as a normal displacement engine

Alain
62039, RE: Stroker kit vs Head Work
Posted by KidEvo, Oct-23-03 08:00 PM
you can stroke a 2.0 to 2.2L
you can stroke a 2.4 to 2.6L

the 420a head flows pretty well stock
(designed by Lotus)