| Go back to previous topic |
| Forum name | Performance/Engine |
| Topic subject | Stroker kit vs Head Work |
| Topic URL | https://forums.2gnt.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=i5&topic_id=62007 |
62007, Stroker kit vs Head Work Posted by rhui, Oct-23-03 08:57 AM
I'm trying to decide which route to take... just wanna get your guys' opinions. Which route should I take for turboing my 420A 2.0L with a T3/T4?
rebuild bottom end with stronger internals and try to make it rev hi later?
or
2.4L Stroker What's the pro's and con's? Will my tranny suffer with the stroker?
|
62008, RE: Stroker kit vs Head Work Posted by JWoodley, Oct-23-03 09:19 AM
i'd probably just build my stock bottom end and throw on some nice cams w/ cam gears. goodluck.
|
62009, RE: Stroker kit vs Head Work Posted by alain95i4, Oct-23-03 09:33 AM
Originally posted by rhui rebuild bottom end with stronger internals and try to make it rev hi later? or 2.4L Stroker What's the pro's and con's? Will my tranny suffer with the stroker?
2.4 stroker ? the only 2.4 is the Chrysler 2.4 engine which is swappable with lots of works, not a direct fit but still doable there are 2.2 stoker kits, displacing around 2.150L actually and since it's a custom system they are come with custom internals
stroker don't hurt tranny, stroker don't even like to rev as hard as as a normal displacement engine
Alain
|
62039, RE: Stroker kit vs Head Work Posted by KidEvo, Oct-23-03 08:00 PM
you can stroke a 2.0 to 2.2L you can stroke a 2.4 to 2.6L
the 420a head flows pretty well stock (designed by Lotus)
|