well heres how it goes i have a chance to either turbo charge my 98 eclipse or theres a company here thats willing to plum in the superchager and pretty much proto type it and the super would be cheaper as it being a prototype ..what should i do????
#20878, "RE: turbocharger or supercharger" In response to Reply # 0
I say go for it. You might be the first person on the board with a supercharger. Traction might be a bitch though since you will have lots of torque right from 0.
#20883, "RE: turbocharger or supercharger" In response to Reply # 5
If its a positive displacement supercharger, I'd say go for it. If its a centifugal charger, I'd skip it. Like turbos, they have to be spinning within a certain range of speeds to pressurize the air (and do it efficiently). Since its rotation is directly tied to engine rotation, it will only be working well at a small range of engine RPMs. I've read that its like taking the negative aspects of the turbocharger (peaky power delivery) and adding them to the negative aspects of a supercharger (belts, brackets). You will see power gains either way, but if its centrifugal, I'd suggest just getting a turbo. Thats just my opinion plus some reading I've done in automotive texts.
Corbin
'95 ESI-T HRC+FMIC+ETC...
Gimme fuel...Gimme fire...Gimme that which I desire
#20884, "RE: turbocharger or supercharger" In response to Reply # 6
Corbin.. some people also see centrifugals as the best of both worlds.. ya don't have to mess with the exhaust at all (like a turbo) you get the high boost capabilities of a turbo, and you don't have to mess with the intake mani like a roots supercharger.
#20885, "RE: turbocharger or supercharger" In response to Reply # 7
Yeah...there are some upsides. I guess it depends on your priorities. I always seem so spend way too much time and money achieving what I think is the "best" solution. Almost every project I've done runs a little over budget and takes 10X too long.
Corbin
'95 ESI-T HRC+FMIC+ETC...
Gimme fuel...Gimme fire...Gimme that which I desire