ok, i know that in stock form, at least on our cars, the MT is better than the AT. right now, i have an AT. if i were to get a torque converter and a shift kit, could i perform as good as a well driven manual? which would cost more, the converter and shift kit or a swapping my auto for a manual? thanks.
'98 Eclipse GS - The slow screamer.
Mods? If God wanted us to mod cars, he would make aftermarket companies. Oh wait... yeah i better get to work on that.
I think it was 99Eclipse who "claims" that he has it and it performs well. I havn't seen his dyno charts or track slips so thats why I say "claim".
I know PuRe RaGe had quite a bit of Level10 work done and he was still much slower than a manual. I think your better off for the cost involved getting a manual swap. Ray ran 28psi on his auto so it really didn't matter a whole lot.
------------------------------------------------ 98 ESi 95 GS
manuals are faster, dramatically faster, but autos are pretty coold too, they both have ups and downs (not losing boost while shifting ect..) you want level 10? get level 10, you want a swap, go for it, more power to ya!
turbo8u: "jiggle jiggle then vroom vroom pshhhh" -Mike Pruett 2gnt member# 976 MOPAR Stage 2 SRTForums.com member #37 (Yeah, I signed up when it first came out, and ended up getting one, cool huh?) "The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his." - General George Patton (1885-1945)
yeah, you're right, they do both have pros and cons. but, its just that, well... everytime i shift into D its like a little piece of me dies, lol. so i think i am gonna go with the swap. anyone have an estimate?
'98 Eclipse GS - The slow screamer.
Mods? If God wanted us to mod cars, he would make aftermarket companies. Oh wait... yeah i better get to work on that.
alot of people think that with the same mods, an auto will be faster than a manual which is not true. if you put all the same mods on each of the cars, a manual will be faster and have more power than an auto. in cases of NOS and turbo, while a manual shifts, it looses boost from the turbo and has to respoil plus you have to hit the NOS at the right time, where as in an auto, you have constant boost when it shifts plus you can hit the NOS and has a constant flow. so therefore you have a lot to think about. in stock form, the manual is better than an auto.....plus its more fun
im thinkinif you take your auto tranny to a junk yard that they will do a dead trade since an auto tranny is more expensive then an MT so i would try dat shit first
Boca Raton, Florida 95 Eclipse GS- sold 99 Eclipse GSX- 386awhp 98 Eclipse GS- sold 92 Prelude
Well, I just finished the swap last night at 12:00. I love it, and I think that it is a worthwhile mod for any A/T car. Huge difference in power and handling. Beautiful. Time to go out driving again, in fact. By the way, it cost me about 800 bux when all was said and done. -=B-=
Dude, Boeing called. They want their wing back.
Dark0ne95: There is a butthole on that girl that his going to feel the wrath of 23 yeras of worldwide hate. Me: Can I put that in my sig? Dark0ne95: GO right fucking ahead.
also, manual redline is at fuel cut, auto shifts at like 6k, or so i heard. while u keep your boost (auto) cuz u dont have to shift, manual gains on u w/power from upper rpm band that auto dont have
also, the engine has to power the auto tranny, or sumthin has to, and the auto tranny weighs in about 2-300lbs more.....
tia
03 srt-4 13.130@112.47mph (n2o, stock turbo, 10/2003) now: 20g, portfueler, bpu+++ (track/dyno times tbd...) i farted on your wiki
Search
Printer-friendly copy
0 Users in Chat
