#138739, "RE: Engine shock damper" In response to Reply # 0
Nope.
______________________________ If a sentence found online has 35% misspellings or greater and includes at least two racially charged expletives, chances are it is a YouTube comment.
'95 Eclipse TurboGS (garage deco) '95 TSi AWD (restoring a survivor) '97 Talon ESi-T (poor impulse control) '99 Eclipse RS-T (daily beater) '13 Evo X (mostly stock) '17 Sienna (Middle Aged Dad Mobile)
#138741, "RE: Engine shock damper" In response to Reply # 2
There's no provisions for it and in the cases I'm aware of, such as Neon "bobble strut" engine mounts, swapping it out for something else is considered an upgrade.
Urethane or solid mounts are going to outperform a dampener, in my opinion, and if the mounts are right the engine isn't going to move enough to require dampening that movement.
What's the material benefit in running a dampener between the engine and body? What's the expectation?
______________________________ If a sentence found online has 35% misspellings or greater and includes at least two racially charged expletives, chances are it is a YouTube comment.
'95 Eclipse TurboGS (garage deco) '95 TSi AWD (restoring a survivor) '97 Talon ESi-T (poor impulse control) '99 Eclipse RS-T (daily beater) '13 Evo X (mostly stock) '17 Sienna (Middle Aged Dad Mobile)
#138743, "RE: Engine shock damper" In response to Reply # 3 Feb-20-21 06:26 PM by scorpo86
Originally posted by DarkOne There's no provisions for it and in the cases I'm aware of, such as Neon "bobble strut" engine mounts, swapping it out for something else is considered an upgrade. Urethane or solid mounts are going to outperform a dampener, in my opinion, and if the mounts are right the engine isn't going to move enough to require dampening that movement. What's the material benefit in running a dampener between the engine and body? What's the expectation?
I tried urethane mounts but for a daily to to much I was just wondering if there was an alterative to help the engine not flex as bad.