Welcome to the 2GNT Forum!
Home Site Background Info & Specs Mods & Tech Info CAPS Part Reviews Donate 2GNT Stickers
Search Printer-friendly copy 2 Users in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine topic #135747
View in linear mode

Subject: "To Boost or not to Boost." Previous topic | Next topic
FotowntalonJan-11-12 08:24 AM
Member since Aug 09th 2009
350 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#135747, "Poll question: To Boost or not to Boost."




          

I have always wanted to boost my car... well always half the time wanted to boost my car. The other half of the time, I have loved going down the NA path and making a decent name for myself. Now though it is time for the big rebuild, and my mind is racing back in forth and changing everyday. While an NA beast would be amazing and almost one of a kind, at the end of the day for all the money and time spent I may possibly break barely into the 13's, it just doesnt feel that great. Or I could rebuild to turbo and have something to show for everything I've gone through.

So I am coming to the community that has kept me going, been great friends and asses, and basically one of the main reason I stuck with the DSM scene for your advice and opinions. I already know MB wants to put some powder on his hands and slap me. So I will probably ignore his vote :p (i'm not a coward mark, just a lot of money to invest for to little show)

So the next question would be, if I boost, boost to 9.6 or 10.5 (or maybe 8.8) if I'm boosting I'd want to still be on 93 octane, with hitting hopefully 450ish to the wheels, while still being bearable to drive on the street.

I think I covered most things, thanks for your time and insults.

Poll result (9 votes)
Boost it 10.5 (6 votes)Vote
Boost it to 9.6 (2 votes)Vote
Nay! (1 votes)Vote
(0 votes)Vote
(0 votes)Vote
(0 votes)Vote

  

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Replies to this topic
RE: To Boost or not to Boost., SilvrEclips, Jan-11-12 08:52 AM, #1
RE: To Boost or not to Boost., Moderatorbullettdsm, Jan-11-12 12:54 PM, #2
      RE: To Boost or not to Boost., BoostedEclipse, Jan-11-12 01:33 PM, #3
           RE: To Boost or not to Boost., 420agreenvilleSC, Jan-11-12 02:54 PM, #4
                RE: To Boost or not to Boost., 740 turbo brick, Jan-14-12 05:29 PM, #5
RE: To Boost or not to Boost., 99RedGs, Jan-14-12 11:33 PM, #6

SilvrEclipsJan-11-12 08:52 AM
Member since Nov 27th 2007
534 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#135748, "RE: To Boost or not to Boost."
In response to Reply # 0


          

I vote for boost. It take a lot of money but like you said you will make much more power in the end. Just dont go cheap on anything and it should be reliable.

98 Eclipse GS Turbo
Built motor - MS2 - Holset hy35 - Zoom Stg 4 Clutch - 57.5mm TB - ARP Headstuds - Turbonetics wastegate - 3" Turbo back - FMIC - Greddy RZ BOV - Walbro 255 - 650cc Injectors - Fidanza Flywheel - Cobra calipers w/ 13" Rotors - Oil Cooler - DevilsOwn meth injection

1981 Chevy Scottsdale
1987 Nissan 300zx - Chump Car
2001 BMW 325i

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ModeratorbullettdsmJan-11-12 12:54 PM
Donating 2GNT member
2676 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#135750, "RE: To Boost or not to Boost."
In response to Reply # 1
Jan-11-12 12:55 PM by bullettdsm

          

Lol, I guess I got nothing I can say. You already covered it for me emoji

But, if you do decide to go the wrong way, I would highly recommend that you do a 10.5 comp engine. It really does you no service to go 8.8 or even stock 9.6. The 10.5 has been done many times and proven to be reliable. As well as, if you ever decide to go back to NA or sell the set-up, you have a better bottom end to work with.




Oh yeah, one more thing; Jackass!



Captain Caveman

96 RS Turbo 11.414 @ 119.62 MSNS, Crower 2 NA cams, BW366, 10.5 comp, UDP, 60mm TB, W/A intercooler, 3.55 tranny 567.9whp 430tq
97 RS NA 13.188 @ 103.87 MSnS powered 12.5 comp, Crower 3's and 219.4whp with 175tq
98 RS DD 12.5 comp on stock ECU, LTH, Crower 2's, Koni, GC, Hypercoil, DG hats
99 OZ 5sp Stocker 15.856 @ 85.97
99 GS stocker auto 17.7@77mph!

wiki home page:http://www.2gnt.com/index.php?d=bullettdsm

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
BoostedEclipseJan-11-12 01:33 PM
Donating 2GNT member
283 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#135752, "RE: To Boost or not to Boost."
In response to Reply # 2
Jan-11-12 01:35 PM by BoostedEclipse

          

Boost it and enjoy it! The two built engines I got are both 8.8:1. The first one was my first rebuild and going higher than 9.0:1 just wasn't even in the back of my mind then. The second one i just acquired was already built with 8.8:1 j.e. pistons. If I ever do another one, which I'm almost certain I will. I would go with the higher compression 10.5 slugs.

Like Bullet said its been done enough now to see that it is def. doable with a tuner who knows what their doing.

- 98 Eclipse rs turbo

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
420agreenvilleSCJan-11-12 02:54 PM
Donating 2GNT member
1527 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#135754, "RE: To Boost or not to Boost."
In response to Reply # 3




          

Originally posted by bullettdsm
I would highly recommend that you do a 10.5 comp engine. It really does you no service to go 8.8 or even stock 9.6. The 10.5 has been done many times and proven to be reliable. As well as, if you ever decide to go back to NA or sell the set-up, you have a better bottom end to work with.


I have 8.8 and the power out of boost frigg'n SUCKSSS! If I could go back, I would've gone high comp - without hesitation. If you go, go high.

___________________________________________



http://www.2gnt.com/quote_db.php?id=278

Outside of Corona: "That sucks, peace out..." (jamie walks away)... "Sweeet, what we doin?" -Zac
Tim's garage (prior to motor install): "Im gonna smoke real quick, that way if you fuck up I am already nicotined up" -Tim

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
740 turbo brickJan-14-12 05:29 PM
Member since Jun 09th 2008
831 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#135791, "RE: To Boost or not to Boost."
In response to Reply # 4




          

Im not going to harass you on this one, lol. Honestly, its preference. I kicked around the idea of making a 10.5:1, boosted, crazy street 420A. In the end, I have decided to go high compression all motor Eclipse, and save the boost and all the maintenance therein, for the 2006 Evo IX I one day own.


95 Eclipse GS: 10.5:1, Crower 2's and MSII
186 WHP - 150 WTQ
14.697 @ 93.85 MPH......Gone, but not forgotten
99 420A Avenger: Given to my sister
99 GS OZ: Sold
03 Evo 8: Family Car with balls

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

99RedGsJan-14-12 11:33 PM
Member since Jul 06th 2007
42 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#135798, "RE: To Boost or not to Boost."
In response to Reply # 0




          

Do it, and go 10.5:1 like I did...

Ah Vtec... All of the lag with none of the turbo

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine topic #135747 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 2.2
Copyright 1997-2005 DCScripts.com, Copyright 2005-2026 2gnt.com
Generated in 0.062 seconds, executing 28 queries.