here you go , a local friend of mine in a 2g neon weird 2.4 setup with a neon SOHC head instead of the usual DOHC head he is the second one to have a running 2.4 sohc engine
wiseco 10.5:1 piston eagle rod homemade ported head crane sohc cam 005 afx race computer + safc afx long tube header #30 injectors 60mm tb fidanza flywheel udp larger exhaust line and a few other basic boltons
first dyno ride still untuned and with too small injectors
yes that's 197 WHp at 6250 rpm and around 160 lb of torque
don't loose your time with a 2.0 if you want to stay NA and have nice hps
#100525, "RE: look at what a 2.4 NA can deliver" In response to Reply # 2
that is very impressive, gives the na guys another alternative for power
I contributed to the Wiki! EVO IX - just a really expensive boost gauge and a K&N air filter 96 Eclipse RS -awaiting registration and inspection 95 Eclipse GS - parts car Mods/Profile - http://www.2gnt.com/index.php?d=cs82685
#100634, "RE: look at what a 2.4 NA can deliver" In response to Reply # 4
makes me wish to see how much power my car made with the 10.5:1 pistons it did have a nice amount of power. But I pulled a 210WHP with the turbo and the pistons so I'd imagine it'd be significantly lower. Man that thing makes as much power as my car hicomp+turbo pretty amazing. VTEC watch out!
http://www.hadesomega.info -car specz and movies 95 Eclipse RS | 76' 280Z | 89' MR2 | 99 Neon | 91 Zephyr Who sez FF can't drift?
#100643, "RE: look at what a 2.4 NA can deliver" In response to Reply # 6 Aug-25-06 11:42 AM by turbo8u
the larger motor is making more power?? no way! those are sweet numbers, that SOHC is choking him out though.
change any of the following and you'll increase the power:
P.L.A.N
P = pressure (higher compression, boost, etc) L = length of the stroke A = Area (bigger bores, more area, more cu in displacement) N = revolutions per minute(honda guys take advantage of this one because they dont have the stroke, the area, or the pressure.)
then you can go into formulas for estimated horsepower (used on steam engines a lot) and from there mean effective and brake effective pressure and from that brake fuel consumption, etc. yadda yadda.
i'd be interested to see what a high compression 2.4L at 9000rpm's would put out. that would be way loud, oh dear.
Originally posted by techboy Those 2.4's are becoming alot easier to come across too. I'm seeing more and more of them in the yards as of late.
no shit....picked up another one less than 5 miles from my house for 100 bucks. sweet!
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
96 Black ESi 91 Red TSI AWD (RIP) 02 WRX
"turnin wrenches for nine hours in the pouring rain, just to get the beast up and running again"
Aerospace Certified TIG welder for Precision Castparts in Portland, OR.
#100751, "RE: look at what a 2.4 NA can deliver" In response to Reply # 9
Originally posted by wite96gs I like the looks of that graph, I'd bet with some boost on that SOB it would be downright sick!
Believe me.. it is.
______________________________ If a sentence found online has 35% misspellings or greater and includes at least two racially charged expletives, chances are it is a YouTube comment.
'95 Eclipse TurboGS (garage deco) '95 TSi AWD (restoring a survivor) '97 Talon ESi-T (poor impulse control) '99 Eclipse RS-T (daily beater) '13 Evo X (mostly stock) '17 Sienna (Middle Aged Dad Mobile)
Search
Printer-friendly copy
2 Users in Chat
]
