Over the past months both of my doors have been attacked by drunkards. I can source some CF doors locally to replace them, or get a pair of shaved doors from a local part out. Ever since Driggs posted about the lightweight squidskins' talon I've wanted to put the RS on a similar weight loss plan.

It is a daily driver and will always remain that way, though I don't know how pertinent that is given that the chassis is a unibody so the doors do not add anything structurally. The doors consist of very thin gauge steel over a single (IIRC) door brace that is about as thick as my thumb. I remember looking inside the door and thinking WOW there is no side impact protection here at all. I've seen/googled many 2g side impacts and the OEM doors provide no penetration protection. I haven't ever seen CF hoods shatter (rather, they bend), and I think the chances of a rollover in a lowered 2g are just about nil. What I'm saying is that I think the risks of CF seem mitigated by several factors and that crash risks are not substantially higher than those in a 2g with OEM doors. Here is the marketing gif from way back:


My 2gnt has been hit 7 times already, these concerns are not something I gloss over. OTOH, I've heard the stock doors weigh nearly 80lbs/each!!! If I remove the door speakers+ CF doors + CF hatch+ CF hood+ switch bumper support beams to aluminum+ lightweight battery, I can see that adding up to nearly 300 lbs of weight loss.

My car is black so it won't detract much from the appearance. Of course, shaved doors would look awesome. There would be no weight savings, but definitely a cost savings. What are your thoughts?

Poll result (1 votes) CF doors: Getting t-boned with stock doors would kill you anyway (0 votes) Vote Shaved doors: Because it's cleaner and cheaper (1 votes) Vote