Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 0 Users in Chat
Top Team 2GNT Community The Pits v3.1 topic #2619
View in linear mode

Subject: "5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power" Previous topic | Next topic
SILVERNTFeb-06-06 05:32 PM
Member since Oct 05th 2002
4543 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#2619, "5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power"


          

5 blades


1 rear mounted close shaving blade


all in all, i was very skeptical. The whole vibrating dildo razor thing put me off. But it was on sale for $8. My honest opinion, i have never had a closer shave, or a less irritating shave. Seriously, buy this razor, its pretty damn good.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power [View all] , SILVERNT, Feb-06-06 05:32 PM
  RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, Hult250R, Feb-06-06 05:42 PM, #1
RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, SILVERNT, Feb-06-06 05:47 PM, #2
      RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, totaleklipse97, Feb-06-06 06:04 PM, #3
           RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, 420a-Tnthewerks, Feb-06-06 06:13 PM, #4
                RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, whodatt1, Feb-06-06 06:16 PM, #5
                RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, 95_ESi_Person, Feb-06-06 06:16 PM, #6
                     RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, 420a-Tnthewerks, Feb-06-06 06:28 PM, #7
                     RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, EclipseSix, Feb-06-06 06:41 PM, #8
                     RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, ScreaminE, Feb-06-06 07:06 PM, #9
                     RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, MR BLUNT 2gnt, Feb-06-06 07:13 PM, #10
                          RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, SonicYan, Feb-06-06 07:54 PM, #11
                               RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, slowmitsu, Feb-07-06 02:34 AM, #13
                               RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, Dualgen2, Feb-07-06 03:24 AM, #14
                     RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, 95_ESi_Person, Feb-06-06 08:53 PM, #12
                          RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, Kirby, Feb-07-06 11:00 AM, #18
                               RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, saikou, Feb-07-06 01:04 PM, #19
                     RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, 97esiboosted, Feb-07-06 05:41 AM, #15
RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, BlackMagic, Feb-07-06 05:55 AM, #16
RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, Blizare, Feb-07-06 08:24 AM, #17
      RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, SILVERNT, Feb-07-06 01:14 PM, #20
           RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, Keith2172, Feb-07-06 01:58 PM, #21
                RE: 5 blades are better than 3? My review of the Gillette Fusion Power, Kaoz78, Feb-09-06 01:34 PM, #22

Top Team 2GNT Community The Pits v3.1 topic #2619 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.026808023452759 seconds, executing 13 queries.