Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 0 Users in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Handling/Suspension topic #19121
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: Pirelli P7000 SuperSport VS Kuhmo Ecsta 712" Previous topic | Next topic
sonny bkJul-26-03 05:21 PM
Member since Jun 23rd 2002
1171 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#19142, "RE: Pirelli P7000 SuperSport VS Kuhmo Ecsta 712"
In response to In response to 4




          

I've had the kumho's for the past couple of years and they may be cheap, but they are the best tires I've ever had. They have endured potholes the size of my car on a 2" lowered suspension. I have only had 1 flat in a year and a half due to a pothole that lasted a 1/4 mile (it felt like I fell into a ditch). They hug the road and don't slide that much during take off. Kumho Ecstas rule


http://www.cardomain.com/member_pages/view_page.pl?page_id=309975

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

Pirelli P7000 SuperSport VS Kuhmo Ecsta 712 [View all] , Wtngclan, Jul-23-03 12:29 PM
  RE: Pirelli P7000 SuperSport VS Kuhmo Ecsta 712, HadesOmega, Jul-23-03 06:55 PM, #1
RE: Pirelli P7000 SuperSport VS Kuhmo Ecsta 712, Shockeclipse, Jul-24-03 12:17 AM, #2
RE: Pirelli P7000 SuperSport VS Kuhmo Ecsta 712, her95eclipse, Jul-24-03 05:49 AM, #3
RE: Pirelli P7000 SuperSport VS Kuhmo Ecsta 712, All4thaN0okie, Jul-24-03 06:56 AM, #4
      RE: Pirelli P7000 SuperSport VS Kuhmo Ecsta 712, sonny bk, Jul-26-03 05:21 PM #5
           RE: Pirelli P7000 SuperSport VS Kuhmo Ecsta 712, pfmicks, Aug-01-03 05:22 AM, #6

Top 2GNT Technical Handling/Suspension topic #19121 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.032777070999146 seconds, executing 12 queries.