Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 1 User in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Turbo/Nitrous Tech topic #868
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: twin turbo application ???????" Previous topic | Next topic
jZaJan-11-01 03:30 PM
Old School 2GNTer
1130 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#869, "RE: twin turbo application ???????"
In response to In response to 0


          

i'm not mechanically inclined pretty much at alll but i think you need at least 6 cylinders for a twin turbo, so each turbo is seperated for low and high rpm or some crazy mess like that
and i think the smaller the turbo the better for daily driving due to less lag

javi d
vroom n' boom
bone-stock dsm performance

jZa
IHS # fo-six-fo-six

"real men don't ride stick"

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

twin turbo application ??????? [View all] , oRACLe063, Jan-11-01 06:44 AM
  RE: twin turbo application ???????, jZa, Jan-11-01 03:30 PM #1
SKRILLA could answer that ? as well. :), MWC, Jan-11-01 03:37 PM, #2
I beilive he is installing a Twin set up., MWC, Jan-12-01 07:57 AM, #4
RE: twin turbo application ???????, TeamJeff_99gs, Jan-11-01 04:04 PM, #3
      RE: twin turbo application ???????, SaberKhan, Jan-12-01 11:28 AM, #5
           RE: twin turbo application ???????, jZa, Jan-12-01 12:40 PM, #6
           RE: twin turbo application ???????, BoostnRS, Jan-13-01 04:57 PM, #7
                RE: twin turbo application ???????, TeamMuRiX, Jan-16-01 04:02 AM, #8
                     RE: twin turbo application ???????, QuicknessNT, Jan-17-01 02:46 PM, #9

Top 2GNT Technical Turbo/Nitrous Tech topic #868 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.056143999099731 seconds, executing 12 queries.