Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 0 Users in Chat
Top 4G63 Technical 4G63 Tech topic #265
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: worth it to purchase? (95 GSX)" Previous topic | Next topic
97eclipse97Jul-30-06 05:36 PM
Member since Jul 29th 2003
695 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#267, "RE: worth it to purchase? (95 GSX)"
In response to In response to 1


          

5-6 is too much for a stock GSX, especially if it has rust! And rust on the strut towers suck! They will eventually eat right through and those NEED to be repaired as they are structural. I paid 5700 (which was overpriced) from a used car dealer back in Feb of '05. You should be able to find a good condition stock '95 for about 4k. I also bought my stock AWD Talon for $2900 a year ago

'95 GSX - New motor/turbo going in...
'95 TSi AWD - For sale...buy me!
'03.5 MazdaSpeed Protege - Stock daily driver
'97 CBR 600 - Purple is a real man's color

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

worth it to purchase? (95 GSX) [View all] , EclipseSix, Jul-30-06 11:52 AM
  RE: worth it to purchase? (95 GSX), Eric, Jul-30-06 01:14 PM, #1
RE: worth it to purchase? (95 GSX), 97eclipse97, Jul-30-06 05:36 PM #2
      RE: worth it to purchase? (95 GSX), Dualgen2, Aug-01-06 03:15 AM, #3
           RE: worth it to purchase? (95 GSX), 97eclipse97, Aug-01-06 12:09 PM, #4
                RE: worth it to purchase? (95 GSX), EclipseSix, Aug-01-06 01:35 PM, #5
                     RE: worth it to purchase? (95 GSX), ModeratoreclipzGST, Aug-01-06 01:39 PM, #6

Top 4G63 Technical 4G63 Tech topic #265 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.014910936355591 seconds, executing 12 queries.