Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 0 Users in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine topic #113
View in linear mode

Subject: "AF/X vs. Unorthodox" Previous topic | Next topic
RazApr-02-01 10:57 AM
Old School 2GNTer
24 posts, 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#113, "AF/X vs. Unorthodox"


          

I'm trying to decide which under drive pulley to get. Any comments either good or bad about AF/X or Unothodox Racing would be much appreciated. Thanks.

  
Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

AF/X vs. Unorthodox [View all] , Raz, Apr-02-01 10:57 AM
  RE: AF/X vs. Unorthodox, fly1, Apr-02-01 12:15 PM, #1
RE: AF/X vs. Unorthodox, klipzracer, Apr-02-01 12:52 PM, #2
Unorthodox..., Skrilla, Apr-02-01 12:55 PM, #3
      RE: Unorthodox..., TeamMichael_97RS, Apr-03-01 02:04 AM, #4
           RE: Unorthodox..., Raz, Apr-03-01 07:44 AM, #5
                RE: Unorthodox..., TeamMichael_97RS, Apr-03-01 08:10 AM, #6
                     Unorthodox..., Skrilla, Apr-03-01 08:30 AM, #7
                          RE: Unorthodox..., HadesOmega, Apr-03-01 08:08 PM, #8
                               RE: Unorthodox..., Pinoy97GS, Apr-04-01 01:31 AM, #9
                                    RE: Unorthodox..., TeamMichael_97RS, Apr-04-01 01:41 AM, #10
                                         RE: Unorthodox..., Pinoy97GS, Apr-08-01 07:34 AM, #14
RE: AF/X vs. Unorthodox, madregal, Apr-04-01 04:12 AM, #11
Howell dist. the AFX, Skrilla, Apr-04-01 05:26 AM, #12
      RE: Howell dist. the AFX, madregal, Apr-04-01 08:25 AM, #13

Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine topic #113 Previous topic | Next topic
   

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.068825006484985 seconds, executing 13 queries.