Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 1 User in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine topic #28973
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: yet another stratus drive gear post" Previous topic | Next topic
alain95i4Jul-31-02 02:22 PM
Member since Jan 28th 2002
794 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#28980, "RE: yet another stratus drive gear post"
In response to In response to 0


          

> I was wondering, since changing the gears takes some off
>top end performance, what if you replaced the drive gear
>with the stratus one, and left the one marked, driven gear
>stock? Would you have acceleration and stock like top end,
>or would it just suck? Just curious. How much would the
>stratus one take off on top end anyhow?

They don't have the same pitch in the gears

Alain

one of the 2.4 true pionners

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

yet another stratus drive gear post [View all] , 9D9 MITSU RS, Jul-30-02 04:18 PM
  RE: yet another stratus drive gear post, mcgyvr, Jul-31-02 12:55 AM, #1
RE: yet another stratus drive gear post, 9D9 MITSU RS, Jul-31-02 03:55 AM, #2
      RE: yet another stratus drive gear post, jsd98dsm, Jul-31-02 06:40 AM, #3
           RE: yet another stratus drive gear post, mcgyvr, Jul-31-02 07:08 AM, #4
                RE: yet another stratus drive gear post, Dirty, Jul-31-02 10:24 AM, #5
                     RE: yet another stratus drive gear post, 9D9 MITSU RS, Jul-31-02 02:16 PM, #6
RE: yet another stratus drive gear post, alain95i4, Jul-31-02 02:22 PM #7

Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine topic #28973 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.062664985656738 seconds, executing 12 queries.