Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 1 User in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine Auto Trans- A604 topic #1268
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: anyone that has disabled converter lockup???" Previous topic | Next topic
amljbsJun-18-03 07:57 AM
Member since Jul 18th 2002
587 posts, 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#1285, "RE: anyone that has disabled converter lockup???"
In response to In response to 4

          

Personally I would run a cooler regardless but thats me. But when you start running the TQ lockup switch you can build up heat quick so I would say yes it would be a good idea.

1998 Eclipse GST

  
Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

anyone that has disabled converter lockup??? [View all] , 9D9 MITSU RS, Jun-17-03 07:58 AM
  RE: anyone that has disabled converter lockup???, soulcontroller, Jun-17-03 08:41 AM, #1
RE: anyone that has disabled converter lockup???, InFiNiT3, Jun-17-03 10:03 PM, #2
RE: anyone that has disabled converter lockup???, amljbs, Jun-18-03 02:39 AM, #3
      RE: anyone that has disabled converter lockup???, python6586, Jun-18-03 06:26 AM, #4
           RE: anyone that has disabled converter lockup???, amljbs, Jun-18-03 07:57 AM #5
                RE: anyone that has disabled converter lockup???, soulcontroller, Jun-18-03 12:36 PM, #6
                     RE: anyone that has disabled converter lockup???, InFiNiT3, Jun-18-03 03:02 PM, #7
                          RE: anyone that has disabled converter lockup???, Joe B Slow, Jun-18-03 03:54 PM, #8

Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine Auto Trans- A604 topic #1268 Previous topic | Next topic
   

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.026252031326294 seconds, executing 14 queries.