Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 1 User in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine Auto Trans- A604 topic #698
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: AC powerloss in relation to ATX" Previous topic | Next topic
mcgyvrApr-18-03 05:06 AM
Old School 2GNTer
3121 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#702, "RE: AC powerloss in relation to ATX"
In response to In response to 1


          

nothing will solve the powerloss, an UDP is your best bet.
I actually dont notice the ac powerloss anymore since the UDP.

any load on the engine will cause a powerloss and the a/c system is a huge load.

the final drive mod will do nothing to fix that.
you might just have a faster car after and not care about the a/c loss.

1998 dodge avenger 4 cyl AT
Mods are:
Not enough

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

AC powerloss in relation to ATX [View all] , jsupetran, Apr-17-03 05:53 PM
  RE: AC powerloss in relation to ATX, amljbs, Apr-17-03 06:10 PM, #1
RE: AC powerloss in relation to ATX, mcgyvr, Apr-18-03 05:06 AM #2
      RE: AC powerloss in relation to ATX, Dark Ringleader, Apr-18-03 08:22 AM, #3
           RE: AC powerloss in relation to ATX, ThE oRACLe, May-22-03 06:13 AM, #4
                RE: AC powerloss in relation to ATX, Dirty, May-22-03 02:30 PM, #5
RE: AC powerloss in relation to ATX, InFiNiT3, May-23-03 10:14 PM, #6
RE: AC powerloss in relation to ATX, Moderatorxcasbonx, May-27-03 06:05 AM, #7
      RE: AC powerloss in relation to ATX, Joe B Slow, May-27-03 06:58 AM, #8

Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine Auto Trans- A604 topic #698 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.013839960098267 seconds, executing 14 queries.