>Like I said before go to that site I just gave you and it
>says that a 93 gt auto mustang runs a 16.1,cobras are the only
>ones that are in the 14's. And I will post my timeslips soon
>as I hit the track since you dont beleive m

That has absolutely got to be the funniest shit I have ever read in my life, do you honestly think that a 93 mustang GT auto runs a 16.1? Not even close. the curb weight on a SCALE, not a mag, is just over 3100 lbs, I have witnessed many many many of them run low 15 to high 14s with your average off the street driver, next up, only the cobra runs 14's? Second most retarded thing I have heard today, My room mates 94 (crappy year, cast pistons, shitty intake track,horribly pinched headers) ran so many 100 14.2's with a set of flowmasters and the stock fucking airbox its rediculous. I cannot believe some of the shit I here coming from this place. 2GNT used to be a kick ass site with a lot of info and people who knew what they had and what it was capable of, now with the exception of the older dudes here, this is like club SI or something. Race the GT, go home with your head tucked under your arm cause he walked you like his little bitch, realize that all those magazines screwed you over, and then wake up and understand with a 110 whp car, you NEED either a turbo, N2O, or a shitload of money for na work to run with those cars cause if they lose, they were not racing. The 96 to 98 GT's are the shittiest years the mustang has had since the pre 87 versions and they run low 15's stock with an auto. Go see a real racetrack before you read all this C&D and motortrend crap.

______________________________________________________________
1999 Civic SI, Boosted and built, 12.67@112.

Gone but not forgotten.....
1998 Eagle Talon ESI, built and boosted 14.2@98
1992 Eagle Talon TSI AWD12.91@104
1992 Honda Hatch swapped and sprayed14.0@108