This has been brought up to me by a couple members and would make searching a bit easier with the 2.4l becoming more common. There might be some difference of opinion on where the subforum should be placed. In a sense this is Engine building and could be placed in the performance section.
#600, "RE: 2.4 L subforum in advanced section" In response to Reply # 0
I've been of the opinion that is they're just discussing the swap, it should go in Perf/Eng. If they're talking custom length rods to improve the rod ratio and raise the redline or ideal camshaft profiles to allow the motor to breathe better in their application, well, that's something else entirely.
______________________________ If a sentence found online has 35% misspellings or greater and includes at least two racially charged expletives, chances are it is a YouTube comment.
'95 Eclipse TurboGS (garage deco) '95 TSi AWD (restoring a survivor) '97 Talon ESi-T (poor impulse control) '99 Eclipse RS-T (daily beater) '13 Evo X (mostly stock) '17 Sienna (Middle Aged Dad Mobile)
#602, "RE: 2.4 L subforum in advanced section" In response to Reply # 2
Originally posted by greygoose I'd like it to be full of relevant information instead of an array of topics.
You're new here, aren't you?
______________________________ If a sentence found online has 35% misspellings or greater and includes at least two racially charged expletives, chances are it is a YouTube comment.
'95 Eclipse TurboGS (garage deco) '95 TSi AWD (restoring a survivor) '97 Talon ESi-T (poor impulse control) '99 Eclipse RS-T (daily beater) '13 Evo X (mostly stock) '17 Sienna (Middle Aged Dad Mobile)
#604, "RE: 2.4 L subforum in advanced section" In response to Reply # 4
For the neon, the 2.4 is a direct fit with a mount kit. For us the 2.4 is a custom install, mounts and brackets need to be fabricated and some wiring to make things work. That is why the Neons enjoy this and we see it as a headache until its complete.