Welcome to the 2GNT Forum!
Home Site Background Info & Specs Mods & Tech Info CAPS Part Reviews Donate 2GNT Stickers
Search Printer-friendly copy 1 User in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Turbo/Nitrous Tech topic #84420
View in linear mode

Subject: "NBo2 WBo2 Comparison / AFR Discussion" Previous topic | Next topic
TeamAvengerMar-29-05 09:46 AM
Old School 2GNTer
2453 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#84420, "NBo2 WBo2 Comparison / AFR Discussion"




          

This topic came up in the chat as well as I have seen some posts about AFRs (lean/rich conditions) so I thought its a good time to hash this out. First here is a graph comparison between WBo2 and a typical NBo2.



Now before I go too far past this I should mention that this is a representation of what your NBo2 is doing. The actual voltage values may vary slighty against this graph. The shape of the curve is right on though and will illustrate the flaw of trying to use a NBo2 for high performance tuning.

(Black dotted line) As you can see the slope of the curve is very steep except for one place and only spans 1V. Right around stoichmetric. This is to satisfy what car manufacturers are looking for ... fuel economy. But this comes at a price of absolute shitty resolution anywhere else in the AFR range. .05V represents 1 AFR in most places! Since most of us with a turbo will tune for somewhere between 12.5:1 to 11.5:1 this blows huge donkey balls.

Enter WBo2 sensor. (Black solid line) As can tell from this graph it maintains a constant slope. NOT ALL WBo2 graphs look like this. Some do have varying slopes but they are all relatively flat. This particular WBo2 Controller is the AEM Gauge Type UEGO Controller. AEM makes a non gauge type UEGO that is made to go with their EMS. That unit's AFR voltage graph is NOT the same as this one. Don't ask me why but we'll discuss that a little later.

Anyways, it's a fairly constant slope that ranges 5V (yes I know it only goes to 3.5V but you're already stupidly lean and blown up your motor at that point so who cares what the AFR is at that point). Makes it easier to find out what AFR you're at.

I think this graph will help people understand why your blinky 0-1V AFR gauge is pretty worthless and why when your NBo2 gauge says your rich it really doesn't mean much. There is just not enough resolution to see where you really are.

I'll probably add more to this when I get home tonight but this is enough for Part 1. Part 2 ... Wideband controllers ... how can they use the same freaking sensor and not be compatible with one another?!



-"Easy Mac"
05 Mazda RX-8 (RR8 #88)
99 Eclipse RS 398whp & 372lb-ft emoji

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Replies to this topic
RE: NBo2 WBo2 Comparison / AFR Discussion, Teamner947, Mar-29-05 10:34 AM, #1
RE: NBo2 WBo2 Comparison / AFR Discussion, Blizare, Mar-29-05 12:50 PM, #2
      RE: NBo2 WBo2 Comparison / AFR Discussion, Moderatorxcasbonx, Mar-31-05 12:58 AM, #3
           RE: NBo2 WBo2 Comparison / AFR Discussion, turbo8u, Mar-31-05 05:00 AM, #4
                RE: NBo2 WBo2 Comparison / AFR Discussion, TeamAvenger, Mar-31-05 05:25 AM, #5
                RE: NBo2 WBo2 Comparison / AFR Discussion, turbo8u, Mar-31-05 06:04 AM, #6
                RE: NBo2 WBo2 Comparison / AFR Discussion, mcgyvr, Mar-31-05 05:28 AM, #7
                RE: NBo2 WBo2 Comparison / AFR Discussion, siueclipse, Mar-31-05 07:06 AM, #8

Teamner947Mar-29-05 10:34 AM
Donating 2GNT member
3168 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#84423, "RE: NBo2 WBo2 Comparison / AFR Discussion"
In response to Reply # 0




          

Good stuff, Thura. I still think a narrow band gauge is still a lot better than nothing, because it tells you when you are richer or leaner than 14.7:1, which can at least put you in one ballpark or another.


2016 WRX STi Limited (current)
2001 A4 1.8tqms (donated)
1991 GVR4 #1933 (sold)
old.dsmregistry.com/detail.php?carid=218 (dismantled)

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
BlizareMar-29-05 12:50 PM
Donating 2GNT member
7595 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#84430, "RE: NBo2 WBo2 Comparison / AFR Discussion"
In response to Reply # 1




          

Originally posted by ner947
Good stuff, Thura. I still think a narrow band gauge is still a lot better than nothing, because it tells you when you are richer or leaner than 14.7:1, which can at least put you in one ballpark or another.


Thats about all it does. emoji But I agree it's Better than nothing.....


I eat emo kids for breakfast

1995 Eagle Talon (SOLD)
72' SuperBeetle
72' Standard Beetle
56' Deluxe Beetle

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
ModeratorxcasbonxMar-31-05 12:58 AM
Donating 2GNT member
2874 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#84476, "RE: NBo2 WBo2 Comparison / AFR Discussion"
In response to Reply # 2




          

There were also talks in the chat of making a custom gauge/warning light to show when running lean. Good idea.

Why can't a company make an AF/R gauge that can read from 0-5v for accurate readings?



Gotta love winter

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
turbo8uMar-31-05 05:00 AM
Member since Jun 15th 2003
10552 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#84480, "RE: NBo2 WBo2 Comparison / AFR Discussion"
In response to Reply # 3
Mar-31-05 05:05 AM by turbo8u



          

Originally posted by xcasbonx
Why can't a company make an AF/R gauge that can read from 0-5v for accurate readings?


they do, but they read wideband sensors not narrowbands

this thread rocks emoji

just a quick question, do you guys see wideband's being used as OEM equipment to replace standard narrowbands on future cars? i remember back in the day, some hondas had widebands stock but i think that was for emissions and such.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

96 Black ESi
91 Red TSI AWD (RIP)
02 WRX


"turnin wrenches for nine hours in the pouring rain, just to get the beast up and running again"

Aerospace Certified TIG welder for Precision Castparts in Portland, OR.

JoshSpair.com

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
TeamAvengerMar-31-05 05:25 AM
Old School 2GNTer
2453 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#84481, "RE: NBo2 WBo2 Comparison / AFR Discussion"
In response to Reply # 4




          

Originally posted by turbo8u
Originally posted by xcasbonx Why can't a company make an AF/R gauge that can read from 0-5v for accurate readings?
they do, but they read wideband sensors not narrowbands this thread rocks emoji just a quick question, do you guys see wideband's being used as OEM equipment to replace standard narrowbands on future cars? i remember back in the day, some hondas had widebands stock but i think that was for emissions and such.


There is a few reasons why companies don't make AF/R gauges that read 0-5V. Almost no car comes with WBo2 sensor from the factory. Somehow, someway each controllers/sensors voltage outputs vary just enough from manufacturer to not be interchangeable (I'll illustrate this a little later if I ever get a chance to write part 2). Lastly, it is a little more involved electronically to control the WBo2 in comparison to the NBo2.

I doubt OEM equipment will ever carry WBo2. It's more expensive for them to engineer something to control the WBo2 (more in terms of mass manufacturing) and they just don't need that fine a resolution to make the cars on the street. They put a fuel/spark map in the car that is fine tuned for the stock setup. The car doesn't come from the factory in a tuneable condition so there wouldn't be much of a need for it.

-"Easy Mac"
05 Mazda RX-8 (RR8 #88)
99 Eclipse RS 398whp & 372lb-ft emoji

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
turbo8uMar-31-05 06:04 AM
Member since Jun 15th 2003
10552 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#84485, "RE: NBo2 WBo2 Comparison / AFR Discussion"
In response to Reply # 5




          

Originally posted by Avenger
They put a fuel/spark map in the car that is fine tuned for the stock setup. The car doesn't come from the factory in a tuneable condition so there wouldn't be much of a need for it.


i wouldnt say it was really fine tuned, i think its fair to say its more of a base tune. when i had my wideband on my friends STi for example it was considerably rich on the stock fuel maps, but i think that subaru just did that to be on the safe side. same thing with our 2gnt's, they were tuned quite rich. i agree with you though that from the factory they dont need to be tuned and dont have much of a need for it. if the stock ecu on a boosted STi read a wideband though, for example...that bitch would feel SO NICE, even at low throttle. the ecu would have much more to work with, but like you said...it doesnt really need it from the factory.

whats the ADVANTAGES of a narrow band? besides 'cost effectiveness'...?



_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

96 Black ESi
91 Red TSI AWD (RIP)
02 WRX


"turnin wrenches for nine hours in the pouring rain, just to get the beast up and running again"

Aerospace Certified TIG welder for Precision Castparts in Portland, OR.

JoshSpair.com

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
mcgyvrMar-31-05 05:28 AM
Old School 2GNTer
3121 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#84483, "RE: NBo2 WBo2 Comparison / AFR Discussion"
In response to Reply # 4


          

yep narrow band sucks
wideband rocks.

tune with narrow band and your just stupid.
tune with wideband and your in-tune.

1998 dodge avenger 4 cyl AT
Mods are:
Not enough

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
siueclipseMar-31-05 07:06 AM
Member since Nov 28th 2002
3504 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#84488, "RE: NBo2 WBo2 Comparison / AFR Discussion"
In response to Reply # 4


          

Originally posted by turbo8u
Originally posted by xcasbonx Why can't a company make an AF/R gauge that can read from 0-5v for accurate readings?
they do, but they read wideband sensors not narrowbands this thread rocks emoji just a quick question, do you guys see wideband's being used as OEM equipment to replace standard narrowbands on future cars? i remember back in the day, some hondas had widebands stock but i think that was for emissions and such.


Volkswagons use a Bosch wideband on all their cars and their turbo models have build in wideband in the ecu.



  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top 2GNT Technical Turbo/Nitrous Tech topic #84420 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 2.2
Copyright 1997-2005 DCScripts.com, Copyright 2005-2026 2gnt.com
Generated in 0.058 seconds, executing 30 queries.