ive got rods and pistons non ported head im running 15 psi and i am about to put the arp head studs in. so if ive got to pull the cams might as well put new ones in. i was lookin at the crane 0014 or maybe the 0016 what are yall running and how does it drive and idle.
#46332, "RE: what kind of cams are yall running" In response to Reply # 0
I just dropped the 16's in mine. Not sure how much improvement there was since I bumped the MBC during install and was boosting 27psi (instead of 20) on 93 octane. Thank God it was cold out! Man was it fast. Spool-up seems about the same, but for some reason it feels a little quicker when NOT boosting (ie. under vacuum). It was raining this morning so I really couldn't play too much with them, so I'll be trying my best on the way home tonight to get a good impression of them.
Greg
'19 Genesis G70 3.3t AWD '88 Chrysler Conquest TSI
#46345, "i almost double posted the same thread, i wanna know too!!!" In response to Reply # 1
i was just about to post the same thread, yea greg tell me how u like the 16s, as everyone knows im undergoing the 2.4 swap and im looking for the best setup. currently bob stockum is undergoing the machine work, going back to stock valves tougher springs, and im trying to figure which cams would be best for my application, thanks for any input or opinions
#46357, "RE: Silly fast" In response to Reply # 3 Apr-07-03 03:18 PM by 992gnt
Well I got to play a little on the way home. I've crossed over from being real fast to being silly fast. I mean like "60-100 in a couple of seconds" silly fast. I'm hoping to get this thing on a dyno before I sell it, so I can give you guys some numbers to shoot for. It pulls SOOOOO hard up on top now. It isn't like night and day different, but it does pull a bit harder. Maybe a trip to the track is in order this weekend....
Greg
'19 Genesis G70 3.3t AWD '88 Chrysler Conquest TSI
#46359, "RE: i almost double posted the same thread, i wanna know too!!!" In response to Reply # 3
yea they will, because the 2.4 swap for the eclipse, has to be mated to the 2.0 head, but, u have to the 2.4 cam gears to the camshaft. the 2.0 camshafts will work, but i wont be able to utilize the most performance out of my race prepped head with these, there for im using 2.4 camshafts. ive heard of people using the stock 2.4 cams in there 2.0 and making some nice hp for the simple mod , im not sure on the complete specs or write up on this but if peoples reading this now about the gains and what not, and want some stock 2.4 camshafts, i got some for sale.
#46393, "RE: i almost double posted the same thread, i wanna know too!!!" In response to Reply # 5
It's always been my understanding that the stock 2.0 cams are more agressive stock for stock than the 2.4L cams.
______________________________ If a sentence found online has 35% misspellings or greater and includes at least two racially charged expletives, chances are it is a YouTube comment.
'95 Eclipse TurboGS (garage deco) '95 TSi AWD (restoring a survivor) '97 Talon ESi-T (poor impulse control) '99 Eclipse RS-T (daily beater) '13 Evo X (mostly stock) '17 Sienna (Middle Aged Dad Mobile)
Search
Printer-friendly copy
2 Users in Chat
It pulls SOOOOO hard up on top now. It isn't like night and day different, but it does pull a bit harder. Maybe a trip to the track is in order this weekend....
