I'm getting impatient waiting for Crane to make another batch of the #14 Turbo cams. I've been waiting 3 weeks already, with no news on how much longer it will be before I can get them. The #16 cams are in stock though. They are a more agressive 'Drag' grind, maybe I should just go with those??? Any opinions?
Greg
'19 Genesis G70 3.3t AWD '88 Chrysler Conquest TSI
#44978, "RE: Turbo or Drag cams" In response to Reply # 0
Well, other than no split duration and a higher lift, the cam specs are almost identical. So I'm getting the 16's. I won't be dynoing before I put them in, so my only comparison will be by the butt-meter. I'll post my impressions of them hopefully next week, after I get done with 'thegame's turbo install this weekend.
Greg
'19 Genesis G70 3.3t AWD '88 Chrysler Conquest TSI
#44984, "RE: Turbo or Drag cams" In response to Reply # 1
I've wandered how the drag grinds would do as well. In theory, it sounds like they should work fine although they might hurt your low end slightly. I don't really know. Definitely tell us your impressions after you run them.
#44992, "RE: Turbo or Drag cams" In response to Reply # 2
There is a great discussion about cams right now in the performance forum and some great charts. Maybe they can help.
1998 Eclipse GS,Hahn Stage 2 Turbo Kit w/ Missing Likn and Vortech SFMU,TurboXS Type H RFL,Corbins Digital A/F Gauge,Apex N1 Exhaust, Nuespeed Short Shifter,Autometer Boost,EGT and A/F
#45018, "RE: Turbo or Drag cams" In response to Reply # 1
Greg, I'm real interested to see how they rate on the butt-o-meter. Its nice to see someone with a turbo go with a little more aggressive cam. Definately keep us posted
Matt 1995 Eclipse GS 2.0L, S16g Turbo, 8 Injectors, 26psi
1998 Eclipse GSX 2.3L Stroker, AEM EMS Converted to Speed Density, FP3065 Turbo, 35psi , and so on...