Just wondering..

The GT cruiser, at 14 psi, gets 215 hp, and 245 lbs torque...

At 10 psi, the 2.4L run, they got 330 lbs torque and 200 something hp..

Just wondering, how did they use the same motor, run less boost, but get more power?

Just wondering.

"Yes, I really do want to get banned. I no longer want to spend hours upon hours online anymore. This site is great and all, but I don't want to come online anymore. I suck, period. Ban me, please.

Thank you.

-Tahleel"

>Just wondering, how did they use the same motor, run less
>boost, but get more power?

They really don't have the same motor
Powertrip engine is a fully built engine the list of mods on that engine is very long

Alain

one of the 2.4 true pionners

it's "PT Turbo"

There's lots of possible reasons. In a Neon, i'd go for the 330ft/lbs of torque before i'd go for the 245hp.

______________________________
If a sentence found online has 35% misspellings or greater and includes at least two racially charged expletives, chances are it is a YouTube comment.

'95 Eclipse TurboGS (garage deco)
'95 TSi AWD (restoring a survivor)
'97 Talon ESi-T (poor impulse control)
'99 Eclipse RS-T (daily beater)
'13 Evo X (mostly stock)
'17 Sienna (Middle Aged Dad Mobile)



Factory Service Manuals: http://nawdu.de/files/

It is probably because of the compression ratio of the two cars. Im sure the neon that had 330lb ft of torque was on the stock bottom end of the NA 2.4. The turbo version probably has much lower compression and a smaller turbo thus the power difference.

Toney
'97 RS 5 Speed (totaled)
15.4606@88.42 Mph
96 Toyota Celica GT
88 Toyota Supra NA-T (w/ sports package)
Got Boost?? Hell yeah I-6 turbo powah baby!