This topic is finding out which one is more efficient.. going with water or oil cooled...

Tell me is this true..

"I heard that water cooled is more efficient than oil cooled, but it is a big pain to install..."

Also, say your opinion..

Thanks

~Tacoman

"Yes, I really do want to get banned. I no longer want to spend hours upon hours online anymore. This site is great and all, but I don't want to come online anymore. I suck, period. Ban me, please.

Thank you.

-Tahleel"

Well if you think about it all turbo's are oil cooled. They all have oil running through them. But yes some turbos do have water jackets around the bearing to cool it down. The turbo in my car is water cooled.

1999 Eclipse RS (all show)
1990 Turbo Eclipse (race)

>"I heard that water cooled is more efficient than oil
>cooled, but it is a big pain to install..."
>

Have you noticed all the hose on the right, left, above and under
the manifold ?

it's not that hard at all to put water cooled on our cars all the hoses that we need to tap into are everywhere around the turbo

Alain

one of the 2.4 true pionners

watercooled versus oil cooled eh........wel, try this. run your turbo without water lines for a few days, but continue to run oil to it, then disconnect your oil lines and hook up water lines. see what happens

in case you havent' figured it out......that isn't the brightest thing to do. don't do it. I was being extremely mean because that question is kinda bad. you should have asked "should I ,and under what conditoins should I hook up water cooling lines to my turbo"

A.D.P.
"...If you do too much, people become dependant. If you do to little, people loose hope. If you do it right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all."
bring it on............

A.D.P.
"...If you do too much, people become dependant. If you do to little, people loose hope. If you do it right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all."
bring it on...........