Welcome to the 2GNT Forum!
Home Site Background Info & Specs Mods & Tech Info CAPS Part Reviews Donate 2GNT Stickers
Search Printer-friendly copy 1 User in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Turbo/Nitrous Tech topic #26472
View in linear mode

Subject: "AT, smic or fmic?" Previous topic | Next topic
EltorosaulJul-14-02 03:24 AM
Member since Apr 28th 2002
55 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#26472, "AT, smic or fmic?"




          

Well, i'm close to getting the Hahn Stage II and since i'm auto I figured this would be best since the super16g would spool faster than the t3/t4 or t3. However, I am now trying to decide which would be best, a side mount or front mount intercooler. The look of the front mount is obviously kick ass but which will give me best response, more power, and would be overall better to get in order to make my auto faster. Thanks for the help.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Replies to this topic

RoboTechDSMJul-14-02 01:42 PM
Old School 2GNTer
1402 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#26473, "RE: AT, smic or fmic?"
In response to Reply # 0




          

Depends on what boost you are willing to run. I believe Stage 1 or even Stage 2 boost levels, a SMIC is more than enough. A SMIC is sometimes more efficient on lower boost settings than a FMIC, less pressure drop. Good Luck!!!!



Kris
"Someday............I'll have traction problems!!!!"
Tampa, FL
Pinoy Turbo 2GNT

1999 HRC Turbo RS
Stage 2
Auto with BOOST!!!!!!!!!!!!

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top 2GNT Technical Turbo/Nitrous Tech topic #26472 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 2.2
Copyright 1997-2005 DCScripts.com, Copyright 2005-2026 2gnt.com
Generated in 0.058 seconds, executing 16 queries.