Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy 2 Users in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Turbo/Nitrous Tech topic #16224
View in linear mode

Subject: "Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit" Previous topic | Next topic
GregFeb-22-02 09:38 AM
Old School 2GNTer
392 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16224, "Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"


          

I hate always seeing peeps on the board thinking cuz you can run 10psi of boost on the HRC kit you can do it as well on the Star kit and make the same power and all the fuel setting will be the same! There are some differences between the two turbo's that most everyone seems to over look. First of all they are two totally different size turbo's. A S16G Flows say 575cfm, a S20G flows 680cfm, and a T3-T4 Flows say 785cfm. Can you see the size difference?? Now if you take two of the idenical engine setups and throw 10psi of boost with the S16G at one and 10psi from a T3-T4 at the other, your gonna see two totally different HP curves and peak numbers. Just for instance a T3-T4 with 10psi on the dyno may make 250FWHP and a S16G with 10psi may make around say 200FWHP(that's a 50HP difference at the SAME boost level!). so with that in mind both turbo's make totally different power at the same boost levels. Like a T3-T4 can make More power on pump gas then a S16g or even a S20G, the reason a T3-T4 can make more power on pump gas than is S16g or even a S20g is because the T3-T4 has less backpressure, less heat which gives lower egt's and less detonation. So to some people that makes the T3-T4 the turbo of choice.....it's still a very streetable turbo and makes good clean power. So these are just a few words of wisdom for those of you who think that you have to match boost levels between the two kits to make the same power. Does my babbling on make sense to anyone?

P.S. some of these #'s I gave may not be exact, there pretty much just examples and if anyone has anything else to add or say, do it up

Greg Williamson
1999 Eclipse GS "Sport" (Sold)
Star Stage III
12.817 @ 109.36

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Replies to this topic
RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, Global Ruler Of All ThingsDarkOne, Feb-22-02 10:07 AM, #1
RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, cyan, Feb-22-02 05:56 PM, #2
      RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, Global Ruler Of All ThingsDarkOne, Feb-22-02 06:10 PM, #3
           RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, Teameclipse804, Feb-22-02 06:16 PM, #4
                RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, Mystic511, Feb-22-02 07:25 PM, #5
                     RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, Global Ruler Of All ThingsDarkOne, Feb-22-02 07:33 PM, #6
                          RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, Dave_FL, Feb-23-02 04:32 AM, #7
                               RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, Matt_95tgs, Feb-23-02 04:41 AM, #8
                                    RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, Nitrous_RS1997, Feb-23-02 05:08 AM, #9
                                         RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, ModeratorEvuLFleA, Feb-23-02 05:18 AM, #10
                                         RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, TeamJasonESi_T, Feb-23-02 05:54 AM, #11
                                         RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, Greg, Feb-23-02 06:28 AM, #12
                                              RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, Dave_FL, Feb-23-02 07:56 AM, #13
                                                   RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, TeamStan2gnt, Feb-23-02 11:55 AM, #14
                                                   RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, sean, Feb-23-02 12:32 PM, #15
                                                        RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, TeamStan2gnt, Feb-23-02 04:10 PM, #16
                                                   RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, Greg, Feb-23-02 04:43 PM, #17
                                                        RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, Dave_FL, Feb-24-02 06:46 AM, #18
                                                             RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, Avenger EST, Feb-24-02 08:21 AM, #19
                                                             RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, RyaN95i4, Feb-26-02 08:13 AM, #27
RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, 99Silver1100, Feb-24-02 08:41 AM, #20
RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, ModeratorEvuLFleA, Feb-24-02 08:49 AM, #21
      RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, TeamStan2gnt, Feb-25-02 03:13 AM, #22
           RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, evan2, Feb-25-02 03:46 AM, #23
                RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, midnite_racer, Feb-25-02 09:37 AM, #24
                RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, jZa, Feb-25-02 10:04 AM, #25
                RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, Dave_FL, Feb-25-02 12:30 PM, #26
                     RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit, SaberKhan, Feb-26-02 08:43 AM, #28

Global Ruler Of All ThingsDarkOneFeb-22-02 10:07 AM
Donating 2GNT member
14938 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16225, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 0




          

Makes perfect sense and i have been saying this for a while now, to those who'll listen. it's common sense.

Do you have any dyno charts at 10PSI on your STAR? I'm curious to see the hp/torque curves.

______________________________
If a sentence found online has 35% misspellings or greater and includes at least two racially charged expletives, chances are it is a YouTube comment.

'95 Eclipse TurboGS (garage deco)
'95 TSi AWD (restoring a survivor)
'97 Talon ESi-T (poor impulse control)
'99 Eclipse RS-T (daily beater)
'13 Evo X (mostly stock)
'17 Sienna (Middle Aged Dad Mobile)



Factory Service Manuals: http://nawdu.de/files/

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
cyanFeb-22-02 05:56 PM
Old School 2GNTer
2958 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16226, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 1




          

...making the star kit faster when driving in a straight line, shifting upwards only.


1995 Eclipse GS - HRC Stage 2 - Retired.
2004 350z Enthusiast / 2008 Nissan Versa SL

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
Global Ruler Of All ThingsDarkOneFeb-22-02 06:10 PM
Donating 2GNT member
14938 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16227, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 2




          

:-)

I broke my tires loose at 90MPH Thursday, top of third gear. 10PSI. That's one good thing about the STAR kit.. It's got great top end. Could use a better FMIC and piping design.. but it's got a nice turbo for >4000RPM.

______________________________
If a sentence found online has 35% misspellings or greater and includes at least two racially charged expletives, chances are it is a YouTube comment.

'95 Eclipse TurboGS (garage deco)
'95 TSi AWD (restoring a survivor)
'97 Talon ESi-T (poor impulse control)
'99 Eclipse RS-T (daily beater)
'13 Evo X (mostly stock)
'17 Sienna (Middle Aged Dad Mobile)



Factory Service Manuals: http://nawdu.de/files/

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
Teameclipse804Feb-22-02 06:16 PM
Donating 2GNT member
5174 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16228, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 3




          

Wow it's funny how the HRC instructions are so detailed and professional, and the star instructions look like they wrote em in an hour.

________________________________________

2004 WRX - WR Blue Pearl
1997 Eclipse GS - Royal Sapphire Pearl

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
Mystic511Feb-22-02 07:25 PM
Donating 2GNT member
1582 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16229, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 4


          

Faster spool up on the s16g was always why i liked hrc better. I guess in the end it's all in preference.

hope this post wasn't posted cuz of my other post on turbo tech.. i didn't mean to make it a bust on star.. shoulda edited it better, my bads if i gave the wrong impression.


16.1 @ 87.11
http://www.virtuallyinfamous.com

ARD 57mm tb and p&p manifold, Neuspeed STB, Pro-kits, Illuminas, Injen CAI with K&N, 2.5" pacesetter catback,
AF/X UDP, Rear STB, Powerslot rotors, RRE SS Brakelines.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
Global Ruler Of All ThingsDarkOneFeb-22-02 07:33 PM
Donating 2GNT member
14938 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16230, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 5




          

>Faster spool up on the s16g was always why i liked hrc
>better. I guess in the end it's all in preference.

This is also one of the reasons i always wished i'd bought an HRC kit. Now that i'm built and running more boost.. i'm happy with what i ahve. I still very much appreciate the engineering of HRC's kits, but my STAR setup has top end like a freight train has good brakes. It effin rocks.

______________________________
If a sentence found online has 35% misspellings or greater and includes at least two racially charged expletives, chances are it is a YouTube comment.

'95 Eclipse TurboGS (garage deco)
'95 TSi AWD (restoring a survivor)
'97 Talon ESi-T (poor impulse control)
'99 Eclipse RS-T (daily beater)
'13 Evo X (mostly stock)
'17 Sienna (Middle Aged Dad Mobile)



Factory Service Manuals: http://nawdu.de/files/

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
Dave_FLFeb-23-02 04:32 AM
Old School 2GNTer
3317 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16231, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 6




          

I have been thinking about this and this is what I came up with....

Lets say the t3/t4 turbo is making 10 psi and the s16g turbo is making 10psi also. Isnt psi messured at the intake manifold. If it is, then 10psi should be the same wheather its from the t3/t4 or the s16g. Isnt 10psi just 10psi. It is a measurement of pressure. Lets say you have a super air compressor that fills tires fast and then you have shitty air compressor that plugs into your lighter. Both compressors will be able to put 10psi of pressure into a tire. But the bigger compressor will be able to put more presure in. The way I look at it, I think the t3/t4 is capable of more boost than the s16g but the s16g is very capable of 23 psi and who needs more than that. The s16g spools faster also. As you can see I have a s16g so I like it a lot;-). But when you have 10 psi at the intake manifold from either turbo I believe it is the same no matter where or how it got there. The only deifference is the speed at which it gets there and the output capability. Am I thinking correctly?

Dave
05 Ford F150 SuperCrew FX4

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
Matt_95tgsFeb-23-02 04:41 AM
Donating 2GNT member
1246 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16232, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 7


          

I agree with you Dave. Yes the T3/T4 flows more cfm's, but that only helps you if you have large ic pipes and a bored out tb etc... I can't see how 10 psi will be any different from a T3/T4 than a S16G without having larger openings between the turbo and the cylinders to flow more air.

Matt
1995 Eclipse GS
2.0L, S16g Turbo, 8 Injectors, 26psi

1998 Eclipse GSX
2.3L Stroker, AEM EMS Converted to Speed Density, FP3065 Turbo, 35psi , and so on...

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
Nitrous_RS1997Feb-23-02 05:08 AM
Donating 2GNT member
1311 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16233, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 8


          

so, with that situation, you could put,for instance, a T-88 turbo on your eclipse, run 10psi on it, and not expect any HP gain over a 16g? i dont understand that concept.



1997 Silver RS
Built
T3/T4 BB Turbo
20psi
Most current 1/8th mile time: 8.1@93mph 2.015 60'
1996 Black Supra TT
2004 Silver Snake

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
ModeratorEvuLFleAFeb-23-02 05:18 AM
Old School 2GNTer
9791 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16234, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 9




          

Dave, read what Greg said "the reason a T3-T4 can make more power on pump gas than is S16g or even a S20g is because the T3-T4 has less backpressure, less heat which gives lower egt's and less detonation."

Yes 10 psi is 10 psi but you have to remember the other factors.

------------------------------------------------
98 ESi
95 GS

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                        
TeamJasonESi_TFeb-23-02 05:54 AM
Donating 2GNT member
3107 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16235, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 10


          

Right. Everything Greg stated is correct. And in some sense, as others have noted, 10 psi is 10 psi. No doubt about it. But, (and this is a very big "but") that 10 psi with a T03/04 turbo, depending on its sizing b/c there are a LOT of T03/04 hybrids out there, produces its 10 psi at a much lower temperature than would a S16g. That means it comes on with more power without requiring additional cooling. We have to remember that power in a horespower sense exists on so many more planes than just displacement, boost and rpm. We also have to consider the very important variable of _temperature_. That's why we all go to such troubles with intercoolers, CAI's, more fuel and such.

This isn't to say that this additional power of the T03/04 doesn't come with tradeoffs. As Dino and I constantly preach, you need to factor in the additional power the Garrett turbo pushes when figuring out the amount of fuel you need to supply. You can't merely apply the same equations from a S16g as you would to a T03/04. Another tradeoff, as Dino has noted is lag. I like where the S16g's power comes on. I wouldn't mind if it were a tad sooner, but all in all, I'm very happy with it. I do admit that when driving my brother's GS-T with a T25, the throttle response is amazing. There simply isn't any lag present. Push throttle, full spool, turbo thrust, and that's it. For around town driving, it's unparalleled when measuring the "fun" factor.

Good post Greg. I think many of us have been preaching the same thing for a long while, but it's never something that can be emphasized enough to dispel any misinformation that can seep into people's minds.

_____________________________________
Jason ESi-T

04' BMW 325Ci
91' Nissan 240SX
98' Eagle Talon ESi (sold)

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
GregFeb-23-02 06:28 AM
Old School 2GNTer
392 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16236, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 9


          

>so, with that situation, you could put,for instance, a T-88
>turbo on your eclipse, run 10psi on it, and not expect any
>HP gain over a 16g? i dont understand that concept.


EXACTLY!! That could not have been put any better. Like for an example I saw Brent Rau Lay down 650WHP off the bottle with a T88 Turbo and 30psi. Then I saw a 99GSX make 450WHP and he was running 30psi on a T3-T4. Dave_FL: can you see the difference now??

Greg Williamson
1999 Eclipse GS "Sport" (Sold)
Star Stage III
12.817 @ 109.36

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                        
Dave_FLFeb-23-02 07:56 AM
Old School 2GNTer
3317 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16237, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 12




          

the two cars you are talking about are totaly different engines. One is a 2 liter V4 and the other a 3 liter V6. But I agree with you somewhat. I think Jason made a good point about the heat that a turbo makes. I didnt think about the heat factor. The t3/t4 probably does make a significant lower amount of heat due to its larger size therefore producing more hp at the same boost pressure. So I guess your right Greg.

I like posts like this . I find this very interesting.

Dave
05 Ford F150 SuperCrew FX4

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
TeamStan2gntFeb-23-02 11:55 AM
Donating 2GNT member
2216 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16238, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 13




          

Well here's the only comparison I've actually seen a dyno graph of with a larger turbo being installed. a T3 with a .48 turbine AR put down 329 @ 15lbs of boost (this a B16A honda but same princible). Switching to a T3 with .63 AR and no further changes power went to 342 @ the same boost level. On the graph it made about 12hp more from 4700 to redline while from 2-4.7K rpm the .48 T3 made about 10hp more. So 10psi is not 10psi with any turbo. The gain was attributed to the decrease in backpressure from the larger turbine housing not heat and all that other sh*t usually associated with bigger turbo's making more power (the compressor size was the same so the gains came from the exhaust side only). I think its safe to assume reasonable tuned the Star turbo should be putting out more top end while a hahn kit should be making more below say 5K rpm or so. From personal experience I'd say the Star feels good from 3500-5000rpm and from 5000rpm up is a monster. I too broke the tires loose at 90+ on the 3-4 shift @ 10psi with a notorious CF clutch (I was on 14" but shit breaking the tires loose at 90 is a feat regardless). If you get caught in the wrong gear 4cyl probes will be kicking your ass. Despite the high rpm the turbo really kicks in its easy enough to stay in the fat part of the curve. Launch at 3000rpm and short shift 1rst and it was all good.


:farfrommugen:
Yes I still own a 2gnt.
Damn right I've been here longer than U
klassic_liven@yahoo.com

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                
seanFeb-23-02 12:32 PM
Old School 2GNTer
99 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16239, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 14


          

I can compare the two turbo's but on different cars and not at 10psi. First off let me say that I don't like the T3/T4 at all, it has way too much lag for a street car. I remeber when I was first thinking about buying a kit for my 96ESi I really considered the Star kit for the "better" turbo, because I thought I needed the bigger turbo. Now I see I was way off, and here's why. I now have a 96NT with a HRC S16G, FMIC, 3" exhaust, AFC and running 5-6psi. Now on the other hand I have a heavily modified 92 GVR4 with a T3/T4, 30x12x2.5" FMIC, 3" turbo back exhaust, VPC, GCC...... Now having said this the Galant runs 18-19psi on pump gas and really pulls, but there is no real kick until 14psi after that your thrown back in the seat. Bottom line is the Talon feels stronger in the early stages of boost then the Galant of course, but from my point of view I don't see the T3/T4 being much fun unless you can run high boost levels. I'd love to hear from someone who has driven both turbos on a 2GNT to see how they really stack up when run on the same motor at the same boost. Dyno numbers, I have no doubt the T3/T4 will make more power the the S16G at the same boost levels but my seat of the pants dyno says the S16G will feel stronger at that boost level because you'll be waiting forever for the T3/T4 to spool. I imagine the ball bearing option would be a totally different story but I don't have one, so there's my two cents.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                    
TeamStan2gntFeb-23-02 04:10 PM
Donating 2GNT member
2216 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16240, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 15




          

I now have a 96NT with a HRC
>S16G, FMIC, 3" exhaust, AFC and running 5-6psi. Now on the
>other hand I have a heavily modified 92 GVR4 with a T3/T4,
>30x12x2.5" FMIC, 3" turbo back exhaust, VPC, GCC...... Now
>having said this the Galant runs 18-19psi on pump gas and
>really pulls, but there is no real kick until 14psi after
>that your thrown back in the seat. Bottom line is the Talon
>feels stronger in the early stages of boost then the Galant
>of course, but from my point of view I don't see the T3/T4
>being much fun unless you can run high boost levels.

Well thats just 420A superiority (joke). Really though your talking about a car that only had 7.8 compression and designed to spool a 14B, not to mention the added task of a pushing power thru a 4wheel drivetrain. it probably had hard enough time mustering up enough exhaust energy to spin the 14B down low let alone a T3/T4. 4G63 people complain of the S16G having too much lag, naturally a T3/T4 isn't going to help any. Also a T3/T4 with what specs. A T3/T4 with a .48 AR and stage 2 wheel is gonna spool helluva lot faster than one with a .82AR and stage 3 wheel. If there's no kick until 14psi how is a smaller turbo going to fix that?. the question is where do you reach 14psi? If you reach 14psi at say 3500rpms a smaller turbo isn't going to make it feel any faster except from 0-3500rpms and at part throttle. If you reach high boost above where its useful to you thats poor turbo selection or a set up being used outside its intended use (I suppose if Lisa Kubo's turbo doesn't kick in until 5500rpms it doesn't matter. I suppose your priority for choosing a T3/T4 to begin with was drag racing, hence the race gas). A star turbo kicks in fully by 3500rpms on a 2GNT which is plenty useful and feelable in normal driving situations.

Dyno numbers, I have no doubt the
>T3/T4 will make more power the the S16G at the same boost
>levels but my seat of the pants dyno says the S16G will feel
>stronger at that boost level because you'll be waiting
>forever for the T3/T4 to spool.

Again when a Star kits boost gauge reads 5psi, a S16G thats reading 5psi isn't going to feel faster as long as they are reading the same thing. it(S16G) may feel slower due to smaller compressor wheel/flow and smaller turbine/backpressure (I doubt heat is an issue with either at this point). It (S16G) will feel faster below the threshold of full boost (because its producing more boost) which happens to be around 3500rpms for the star kit. and throttle response will be better because it will likely still spool with less exhaust energy at any rpm. I think the S16G probably feels faster when not going all out (cruising, high gear passing, part throttle toying with hondas). From 3500rpm on @ full boost I really doubt it feels faster. There really isn't any waiting in the way that it sounds. You wait for 3500rpm and Smack full boost is almost instant. You dont HAVE to drive below 3500rpm except to take off smoothly (in other words if you want it bad enough the power is there with a star kit, you just may have to work for it sometimes. you may need to downshift when you dont feel like it on occasion. so what you look a little silly cruising at 3800rpms waiting for that honda in your rear view to come up on you. at least you wont be disappointed when you nail it when he's about next to you going full steam and there's still something left to take him).


:farfrommugen:
Yes I still own a 2gnt.
Damn right I've been here longer than U
klassic_liven@yahoo.com

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
GregFeb-23-02 04:43 PM
Old School 2GNTer
392 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16241, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 13


          

>the two cars you are talking about are totaly different
>engines. One is a 2 liter V4 and the other a 3 liter V6.
>But I agree with you somewhat. I think Jason made a good
>point about the heat that a turbo makes. I didnt think about
>the heat factor. The t3/t4 probably does make a significant
>lower amount of heat due to its larger size therefore
>producing more hp at the same boost pressure. So I guess
>your right Greg.
>
>I like posts like this . I find this very interesting.


Dave_FL: Could you please explain yourself?? I was talking about a 99 Eclipse GSX and a 95 GSX (Brent Rau's car) and they both have the same power plant (4G63). Also there's no such thing as a V4 and who has a 3L V-6? you kinda lost me there.

Greg Williamson
1999 Eclipse GS "Sport" (Sold)
Star Stage III
12.817 @ 109.36

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                
Dave_FLFeb-24-02 06:46 AM
Old School 2GNTer
3317 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16242, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 17




          

When I saw the t88 turbo I immedietly thought of a supra. WHOOPS. I wasnt paying attention. Maybe I was drinking at the time I posted that..LOL.....Damn man a t88 turbo on an eclipse is huge!!! And the 3liter v6 is what is in the supras and the v4 would mean a 4 cylinder. I just didnt feel like typing out "4 cylinder" so i just said v4.

Off topic....Are you going to be here on the 22nd of march for the spring break thing? I hope so it will be fun. And we can hit the drag strip a couple times too.

Dave
05 Ford F150 SuperCrew FX4

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                    
Avenger ESTFeb-24-02 08:21 AM
Member since Nov 19th 2001
658 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16243, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 18


          

the 2jz-gte is an inline 6 cyl.

A.D.P.
bring it on............

A.D.P.
"...If you do too much, people become dependant. If you do to little, people loose hope. If you do it right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all."
bring it on...........

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                    
RyaN95i4Feb-26-02 08:13 AM
Old School 2GNTer
2152 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16244, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 18




          

umm..u have a i-4, not a v4. and like armond already stated, the supra motor is a i-6, not a v6.

95 Avenger
ATX->MTX Swap
Holset HX40 @ 26 psi

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

99Silver1100Feb-24-02 08:41 AM
Member since Jan 27th 2002
169 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16245, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 0


          

What turbo would be better for an auto?

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ModeratorEvuLFleAFeb-24-02 08:49 AM
Old School 2GNTer
9791 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16246, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 20




          

>What turbo would be better for an auto?


Read up above and make your own conlusion. Being an auto you might want to have a quicker spool because we have absolutely no power down low. So you might want to remember that.

------------------------------------------------
98 ESi
95 GS

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
TeamStan2gntFeb-25-02 03:13 AM
Donating 2GNT member
2216 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16247, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 21




          

>>What turbo would be better for an auto?
>
>
>Read up above and make your own conlusion. Being an auto you
>might want to have a quicker spool because we have
>absolutely no power down low. So you might want to remember
>that.

Well let me be blunt. The 16G


:farfrommugen:
Yes I still own a 2gnt.
Damn right I've been here longer than U
klassic_liven@yahoo.com

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
evan2Feb-25-02 03:46 AM
Old School 2GNTer
3903 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16248, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 22


          

you guys are so smart.
Dave your killing me

first v4.. then a supra with a v6 come on now.. even my slow butt knows its a inline

I love dino and 2gnt. ####ers (my word) bliz stole it but i let him borrow it

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
midnite_racerFeb-25-02 09:37 AM
Member since Feb 06th 2002
109 posts,
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16249, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 23


          

So "basically" what you guys are saying is...


the s16g spools quicker, but the t3/t4 makes more power in the long run ?


Im just a tad bit lost in all this turbo talk...


And also, does the Star kit have as many stages as the HRC kit ?

"Friends don't let friends drive stock."

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
jZaFeb-25-02 10:04 AM
Old School 2GNTer
1130 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16250, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 24


          

I don't think its possible to make a logical decision since there's so few of us and the times are so inconsistent. With everything installed right the 16g should definetly spool up quicker. Ideally the t3/t4 will allow for more power at the same boost level, but we aren't sure that the particular one that comes with all these kits is the optimal one for max power since there's so many different t3/t4 turbos out there. Another thing is piping and intercooler, i know hrc has the better intercooler, not sure which one has better piping.
This again brings up the advantage of hrc's research and racing background with the car, you can be pretty sure that what they provide is a good choice for our car. We don't know much about Star (except they made by Drag )

jZa
IHS # fo-six-fo-six

"real men don't ride stick"

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
Dave_FLFeb-25-02 12:30 PM
Old School 2GNTer
3317 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16251, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 23




          

I was just trying to state that they they are 6 cylinder engines and we have 4 cylinder engines. Jeeeez, You guys are picky. You know what I ment. And yes, I know the supras are inline, but who really cares?

Dave
05 Ford F150 SuperCrew FX4

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
SaberKhanFeb-26-02 08:43 AM
Old School 2GNTer
994 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16252, "RE: Comparing 10psi on the HRC S16g kit vs. 10psi on the Star T3-T4 kit"
In response to Reply # 26


          

The Supra boys prolly do I also caught the V4 right off the back. We're a picky bunch. Eccentric really. No, really.


91 awd: 60-1, 880's, E-Prom, etc.
93 awd: JDM 6 bolt, K&N, full exhaust, Wally 255, otherwise stock.

R.I.P. the original "Factory Freak"
15.5's with short ram and catback only
1996 RS 5-speed

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top 2GNT Technical Turbo/Nitrous Tech topic #16224 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.142245054245 seconds, executing 12 queries.