hey, im kinda new, still dont know what a lot of things are...
whats crankwalk? which engine is more reliable, the 420a or the 4g63?
is it just a rumor i heard, or are the auto transmissions in the chrysler cars not very reliable? why do the spyders have a 2.4 (make up for weight difference?)? just a few thoughts.
Brandon

which engine is more reliable, the 420a or
>the 4g63?
>is it just a rumor i heard, or are the auto transmissions in
>the chrysler cars not very reliable?
why do the spyders have
>a 2.4 (make up for weight difference?)? just a few thoughts.

Both engines are good engines. it all your opinion which is better. the 4g63 is more likly to get crankwalk than a 420a. the 4g63 can also handle more boost stock if its the turbo version. the 420a, if rebuilt can hold just as much boost.
I have a auto N/T and i've had no probs with my engine or trans.
i don't know why spyders have 2.4 liter engines but they have a non-turbo 4g64 engine which can't hanlde boost like the 4g63 turbo version.

98 esi A/t:
injen intake
n1 muffler
white gauges
17' adr sokodu's
coilovers 1.75' drop
obx front strut bar
3 stage metal headgasket
(should of rebuilt bottem when this was done but I'm stupid)

98 esi A/t:
injen intake
n1 muffler
white gauges
17' adr sokodu's
coilovers 1.75' drop
obx front strut bar
3 stage metal headgasket
(should of rebuilt bottem when this was done but I'm stupid)

>why do the spyders have
>a 2.4 (make up for weight difference?)? just a few thoughts.

Exactly. The spyders use a 2.4 engine to have increases torque the get the even portlier Spyder moving....

Current Mods:
I WISH!

**************
Fucking Kangaroos.
**************