i know the neon has 150hp and our have 140hp. i was told it was because of the cams is it true,if so would it be worth it to put the cams of a neon in my car. thanks

the cams may be different.. but I would think it would be more from their superious intake and exhaust designs, by having the exhaust in the back of the block you get a much straighter exhaust path by not having to bend around the engine and then go back.. they just go back.. but that's just my theory.

I read that both engine produce about the same, its just that dodge “exaggerates” a little with the numbers for the neon.

Maybe a 2.4L intake cam with help with hp. check the specs

------------------------------

Yeah, you don't want those anyway. They're still stock(for the neon). You should get some performance cams if you really want to upgrade. Crane and Crower make some good ones.


ride__________95 Eclipse RS : 5 speed
power________Gude cams : AFX UDP : ram air : test pipe : Thrush glasspack
suspention___BOMZ F/R upper strut bars : ES inserts
shizzle_______AutoCommand remote start : Dual air horns : Kenwood KDC 5000 : Rampage sub
incomming___lower strut bars

95 Eclipse RS : 5 speed
14.76 @ 94.72mph
Jeep TB writeup - http://www.dimensia.com:81/jimbo/JeepTBfor2gnt.html

if you ask me, it's because the Neon DOHC runs 9.8:1 compression to our 9.6:1, with a little "exageration"

______________________________
If a sentence found online has 35% misspellings or greater and includes at least two racially charged expletives, chances are it is a YouTube comment.

'95 Eclipse TurboGS (garage deco)
'95 TSi AWD (restoring a survivor)
'97 Talon ESi-T (poor impulse control)
'99 Eclipse RS-T (daily beater)
'13 Evo X (mostly stock)
'17 Sienna (Middle Aged Dad Mobile)



Factory Service Manuals: http://nawdu.de/files/