#16415, "RE: v6 is out of the question, now, 2.4L is my goal, read up..." In response to Reply # 4
I'm interested too....hit me up at soldier101@knology.net AIM name MichaelLpruett and lemme know what's up and how you plan on doin it
turbo8u: "jiggle jiggle then vroom vroom pshhhh" -Mike Pruett 2gnt member# 976 MOPAR Stage 2 SRTForums.com member #37 (Yeah, I signed up when it first came out, and ended up getting one, cool huh?) "The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his." - General George Patton (1885-1945)
#16416, "RE: v6 is out of the question, now, 2.4L is my goal, read up..." In response to Reply # 5
I've got pics of the top of our 420a block w/o the head on it. now i just need to get theirs with out the head on. so far it seems like everything will fit. Only a few things worry me. 1 being if there is any extra length to the block. the mounts seem to be EXACTLY like our i am not sure about the rear tho. so far everything looks good. I just gotta find out about ECU's and sensors now. Nick or myself will update you guys.
#16417, "RE: v6 is out of the question, now, 2.4L is my goal, read up..." In response to Reply # 6
if we got our engines bored .20 giving us 2.2 and we added a 2.4 block......could that possibly give us 2.6?
turbo8u: "jiggle jiggle then vroom vroom pshhhh" -Mike Pruett 2gnt member# 976 MOPAR Stage 2 SRTForums.com member #37 (Yeah, I signed up when it first came out, and ended up getting one, cool huh?) "The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his." - General George Patton (1885-1945)
#16418, "RE: v6 is out of the question, now, 2.4L is my goal, read up..." In response to Reply # 7
if you're thinking a standard overbore for new pistons (.020) - it's not going to give you anywhere close to .2L .
As for .20 .. Have you ever seen how thin our cylinder walls are to begin with? That's a LOT of metal to remove, and i still doubt it would give you .2L.
______________________________ If a sentence found online has 35% misspellings or greater and includes at least two racially charged expletives, chances are it is a YouTube comment.
'95 Eclipse TurboGS (garage deco) '95 TSi AWD (restoring a survivor) '97 Talon ESi-T (poor impulse control) '99 Eclipse RS-T (daily beater) '13 Evo X (mostly stock) '17 Sienna (Middle Aged Dad Mobile)
#16419, "RE: v6 is out of the question, now, 2.4L is my goal, read up..." In response to Reply # 8
hmmm, I could have sworn I read somewhere on here that people were boring their engines .20 and it was giving them .2 more litres...my bad
turbo8u: "jiggle jiggle then vroom vroom pshhhh" -Mike Pruett 2gnt member# 976 MOPAR Stage 2 SRTForums.com member #37 (Yeah, I signed up when it first came out, and ended up getting one, cool huh?) "The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his." - General George Patton (1885-1945)
#16420, "Stratus website says the 2,4L swap has been done..." In response to Reply # 9
After posting the thread at stratusphere.org last night, we got a reply saying that someone has already done the 2.4L swap on their 420a Avenger and turboed it.
Sounds like good news, but they said to contact a member on that baord "Glacius", but I dont see him in their registry.
This is what the webmaster at Stratusphere.org wrote...
"Glacius, our resident ASOG guy, has done just this on his turbocharged Avenger.
He has the same 420A 2.0 you folks have, except that he has installed a 2.4 head on it. He also had to replace the cams, so that the flow thru the head was reversed to match the 'backwards' intake/exhaust manifolds on the DSMs.
So yes, it can be done. Give him a shout or a PM. Check the main forum under "2.4 Turbo Pics" - he's got a shot of his engine bay in there... "
Search
Printer-friendly copy
0 Users in Chat
