Welcome to the 2GNT Forum!
Home Site Background Info & Specs Mods & Tech Info CAPS Part Reviews Donate 2GNT Stickers
Search Printer-friendly copy 1 User in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine topic #15594
View in linear mode

Subject: "what do you think?" Previous topic | Next topic
rydereclipseFeb-23-02 11:30 AM
Member since Feb 15th 2002
258 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#15594, "what do you think?"


          

Hey i need u guys opinions. I am running a 95 rs with he following
mods, i would like to know what u guys think i am putting
to the ground in terms of time and hp. I've been reading a
few of the posts and all u guys seem to know what u are talking
about. Heres what i got-

-Weapon R intake
-Pacesetter header (wrapped)
-MSD wires & NGK iridum plugs
-NOS 50-shot (dry)
-Arospeed muffler (2 1/2 in. piping)
-Power Tower (dont know who makes it)

i got a couple other things (underdrive pulley and MSD DIS-2)
on back order. I REALLY appreciate any feedback, i'm new to the world of DSM, but I'm already a triple-star junkie!

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Replies to this topic

bigbrent88Feb-23-02 12:03 PM
Member since Jan 13th 2002
692 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#15595, "RE: what do you think?"
In response to Reply # 0


          

I would think 125whp, if base is 115 whp, maybe slightly more.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Dave_FLFeb-23-02 12:54 PM
Old School 2GNTer
3317 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#15596, "RE: what do you think?"
In response to Reply # 1




          

He has a 50 shot of nos!!! So my guess would be about 200ish to the crank. Should get you some low 15's. I saw a ZX2 at the track the other day running 15.0 on a 50 shot. They are about the same as a 2gnt eclipse in speed.

Dave
05 Ford F150 SuperCrew FX4

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
bigbrent88Feb-23-02 01:22 PM
Member since Jan 13th 2002
692 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#15597, "RE: what do you think?"
In response to Reply # 2


          

Well crap, hey I'm tired, damn NOS always getting me, i've never understood NOS, does 50 shot mean 50 more hp or is it amount used?

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
BreezioFeb-23-02 05:37 PM
Old School 2GNTer
4863 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#15598, "RE: what do you think?"
In response to Reply # 3


          

a zx2 running a 50 shot will do better then a eclipse running a 50 shot.. it's agreed that a stock 2gnt runs a 16.4ish 1/4.. right? I stock zx2 runs 15.8 1/4 mile.. so. I don't think they are the same speed.. stock for stock. and so.. adding a 50 shot to both.. i would 'think' the zx2 would still be ahead.. so with that said.. if ya saw a zx2 with a 50 shot do 15.0 1/4.. then i'd say that if you did a 50 shot to a 2gnt.. you should run about 15.5ish ? or I suppose I could be a bit off.. maybe a 50 shot will help a 2gnt more then a zx2.. who knows.. hehe. anyone around here just running a 50 shot? what's your times? hehe.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine topic #15594 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 2.2
Copyright 1997-2005 DCScripts.com, Copyright 2005-2026 2gnt.com
Generated in 0.074 seconds, executing 22 queries.