Welcome to the 2GNT Forum!
Home Site Background Info & Specs Mods & Tech Info CAPS Part Reviews Donate 2GNT Stickers
Search Printer-friendly copy 1 User in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine topic #125816
View in linear mode

Subject: "Bad fuel mileage with EGR blockoff" Previous topic | Next topic
MoMs2gNtMay-27-09 05:44 PM
Member since Mar 30th 2009
18 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125816, "Bad fuel mileage with EGR blockoff"
May-27-09 05:50 PM by MoMs2gNt

          

I have a quick question, has anyone had any ill effects to fuel mileage when they installed the EGR blockoff plates? I know this is a rather odd question due to the fact that fuel mileage is thrown to the wind when it comes to modifications.
The reason I am asking is because when I installed the EGR blockoff to my mothers 95 Talon she said she started to notice a decrease in fuel mileage.... I am trying to keep her car as fuel friendly as possible. I never even cared about mileage when I modified my NA, I dont think I could do anything to that car to get near the crappy mileage that my 91 gsx gets. Plus I did all of the mods to my NA all at the same time so it was rather hard to tell exactly what made a difference in mileage.
I am adding that, I have after, she told me about the decrease in mileage, replaced the plugs, o2 sensor, cleaned the air filter, and even sent the injectors off to be cleaned. So I have tried my best to diagnose any fuel mileage loss with no change in mileage.... MOM SAYS HELP!

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Replies to this topic

RoninEclipse2GMay-27-09 05:53 PM
Donating 2GNT member
2745 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125818, "RE: Bad fuel mileage with EGR blockoff"
In response to Reply # 0




          

EGR blockoff should actually increase the fuel mileage very slightly since the computer doesn't have to adjust for hot, dirty exhaust coming back into the intake.

My guess is that it's 2 unrelated items that happened around the same time. Try some really good fuel system cleaner, and/or do a seafoam combustion chamber cleaning to start with.

Another thing that's an inexpensive test is to have her fill up the next tank with higher grade fuel than she normally does. if the fuel economy jumps back up then the engine has carbon buildup in the cylinders that needs cleaning.

Erik P.
Official 2GNT thread Hijacker
Some say that he's driven over more Covenant than he's shot, and that his grenades aren't where you'd expect them to be...
All we know is, He's not The Stig... But he is The Stig's Spartan cousin!

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
MoMs2gNtMay-27-09 06:06 PM
Member since Mar 30th 2009
18 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125820, "RE: Bad fuel mileage with EGR blockoff"
In response to Reply # 1


          

That was my thought also, I am a ASE master certified mechanic and currently own my own shop, the idea of the EGR is to reburn spent exhaust gasses for better smog controle as well as give a richer mixture because of the rich nature of a stock ECU, it will sence that and correct fuel trims. So with that in mind I also figured that if you take that semi rich exhaust out of the intake it will rely on a compleatly new fuel trim and run a slight bit leaner. As for the carbon build up, I can promise you that is not an issue, the motor doesnt even have 8k on it yet, as well as it has swirl polished stock size valves and the combustion chambers are smoothed and polished with new .020 10.5:1 pistons... no carbon there. And I have replaced the fuel filter and added 2 bottles of lucas fuel treatment to it since the issue occured.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

adamztyMay-27-09 08:53 PM
Donating 2GNT member
219 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125822, "RE: Bad fuel mileage with EGR blockoff"
In response to Reply # 0


          

I have not noticed any effect in my gas mileage.

The purpose of EGR is to recirculate exhaust gases back into the motor. By putting air back into the motor that has less oxygen in it (because it's already been burned once), there will be less fuel required. This also helps to keep combustion chamber temperatures below 2500°F to lower NOx emissions. Therefore theoretically you would loose a little gas mileage by removing it.

At least that's the way I understand it from what I have read. emoji

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
RoninEclipse2GMay-28-09 10:52 AM
Donating 2GNT member
2745 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125826, "RE: Bad fuel mileage with EGR blockoff"
In response to Reply # 3




          

Originally posted by adamzty
I have not noticed any effect in my gas mileage. The purpose of EGR is to recirculate exhaust gases back into the motor. By putting air back into the motor that has less oxygen in it (because it's already been burned once), there will be less fuel required. This also helps to keep combustion chamber temperatures below 2500°F to lower NOx emissions. Therefore theoretically you would loose a little gas mileage by removing it. At least that's the way I understand it from what I have read. emoji

you're close but completely wrong. Even though the "air" (actually hot nasty exhaust) being recirculated has very little oxygen, the ECU overcompensates for the high temperature and runs MORE fuel to prevent detonation.

have you ever studied older rotary engines? They have a nasty habit of sucking hot exhaust back into the intake cycle during low rpms because of port overlap and the ECU compensates by running obnoxiously rich. those engines actually get better fuel mileage at mid rpms because the overlap is negated by the exhaust velocity.

Long story short, the ECU compensates for the heat first, not the oxygen content.

Erik P.
Official 2GNT thread Hijacker
Some say that he's driven over more Covenant than he's shot, and that his grenades aren't where you'd expect them to be...
All we know is, He's not The Stig... But he is The Stig's Spartan cousin!

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine topic #125816 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 2.2
Copyright 1997-2005 DCScripts.com, Copyright 2005-2026 2gnt.com
Generated in 0.064 seconds, executing 22 queries.