Welcome to the 2GNT Forum!
Home Site Background Info & Specs Mods & Tech Info CAPS Part Reviews Donate 2GNT Stickers
Search Printer-friendly copy 1 User in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine topic #125460
View in linear mode

Subject: "True to 420a form?" Previous topic | Next topic
lamrithMay-01-09 10:31 PM
Member since Apr 29th 2009
3 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125460, "True to 420a form?"


          

1998 Eclipse GS. Car has 170K on odo, but Engine has 185compression on all 4 cyl and idles 17 vacuum, so should be running nice and solid...

So, 2.5 weeks into owning the car and I have to say I am starting to wonder. I love the look of the car, always have which partially prompted my decision to buy one. I have asked some questions here and on the mitsubishi forums, gotten helpfull answers and still have a few things to track down myself with regards to pulling codes etc..

HOWEVER, I am really starting to wonder if my car is just worn out (engine/trans) or if I am expecting too much? I bought the car for mileage increase and (yes I know silly) an Auto trans. Auto trans was a big factor as I often commute in 1hr of stop/go traffic, 5spd just sucks, I have a 5spd mustang parked that this eclipse has replaced. I know they are the slowest of the 2G's but this car is SERIOUSLY bad. I have to put my foot on the floor on onramps to get up to speed to merge properly at the speed limit, the car just has NO pull. I have driven 4cyl auto's before and this car seems extremely weak. no pull at all in any way till almost 4k and even then is weak to 5k.

Case in point, I got in the wifes '00 galant 4cyl (150k odo) tonight for a trip to the store. 2.4l auto trans, 4 people in it, bigger heavier car, it will BLOW my eclipse away before it even gets out of 1st gear. No lie it feels 2x as fast, to add insult she gets 26mpg and I only get 24mpg?? Are the 420a auto's THAT slow? I never expected a racecar, but thought it would be much more responsive than I am seeing. And being thrashed by a bone stock 4dr sedan is just embarasing.

Sorry for the text wall, I am just well, dissapointed, and trying to decide if it just needs a rebuild or is performing like a normal 420a, and I need to think about a different car. emoji

Any feedback or help would be greatly appreciated.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Replies to this topic
RE: True to 420a form?, 740 turbo brick, May-02-09 01:27 AM, #1
RE: True to 420a form?, RoninEclipse2G, May-02-09 09:20 AM, #2
RE: True to 420a form?, BoostedEclipse, May-02-09 09:28 PM, #3
      RE: True to 420a form?, 420agreenvilleSC, May-02-09 09:51 PM, #4
      RE: True to 420a form?, Moderatorbullettdsm, May-03-09 03:13 AM, #5
           RE: True to 420a form?, Moderatorteklein, May-03-09 10:31 AM, #6
                RE: True to 420a form?, eclipserstturbo, May-03-09 03:30 PM, #7
                RE: True to 420a form?, burntheblobs, May-03-09 04:56 PM, #8
                     RE: True to 420a form?, lamrith, May-04-09 06:23 AM, #9
                          RE: True to 420a form?, John99RS, May-04-09 07:56 AM, #10
                          RE: True to 420a form?, RoninEclipse2G, May-04-09 05:29 PM, #11
                               RE: True to 420a form?, Mike431635, May-05-09 06:11 AM, #12
                               RE: True to 420a form?, lamrith, May-05-09 06:35 PM, #13
                               RE: True to 420a form?, Tuxdreamerx, May-06-09 08:39 AM, #14
                                    RE: True to 420a form?, eclipserstturbo, May-06-09 09:46 AM, #15
                                    RE: True to 420a form?, Tuxdreamerx, May-06-09 01:47 PM, #16
                                    RE: True to 420a form?, John99RS, May-06-09 05:11 PM, #17
                                         RE: True to 420a form?, ModeratorCorbin, May-07-09 06:31 PM, #18
                                              RE: True to 420a form?, John99RS, May-08-09 02:47 PM, #19
                                              RE: True to 420a form?, RoninEclipse2G, May-08-09 04:25 PM, #20
                                              RE: True to 420a form?, Black-Out, May-08-09 11:14 PM, #21
                                              RE: True to 420a form?, Tuxdreamerx, May-09-09 06:39 PM, #22
                          RE: True to 420a form?, burntheblobs, May-04-09 08:57 AM, #23
                               RE: True to 420a form?, Mike431635, May-04-09 09:12 AM, #24
                                    RE: True to 420a form?, Cyexmaster, May-04-09 04:04 PM, #25
                                         RE: True to 420a form?, TheGhost, May-04-09 10:08 PM, #26
RE: True to 420a form?, fullmoon, May-06-09 11:18 AM, #27

740 turbo brickMay-02-09 01:27 AM
Member since Jun 09th 2008
831 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125461, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 0




          

The auto-tragic tranny isnt helping, but you should be doing better than that. Stock 420As arent going to break any records, but they have some pep to them. My car gets 32mpg on a daily basis, and last ran a 16.6 at the track with simple mods, although my car is 5 spd.


95 Eclipse GS: 10.5:1, Crower 2's and MSII
186 WHP - 150 WTQ
14.697 @ 93.85 MPH......Gone, but not forgotten
99 420A Avenger: Given to my sister
99 GS OZ: Sold
03 Evo 8: Family Car with balls

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
RoninEclipse2GMay-02-09 09:20 AM
Donating 2GNT member
2745 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125462, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 1




          

It's the slushbox attached to that engine. your compression and vacuum suggest that the engine is in fine shape.

I thought the automatics in the old jaguars that I've had were crap, then I drove an auto 420A. horrible. not to mention my first engine still got better mileage when it was worn out than my friends auto.

do a 5 speed conversion or get a manual car if you really want something peppy with decent gas mileage

Erik P.
Official 2GNT thread Hijacker
Some say that he's driven over more Covenant than he's shot, and that his grenades aren't where you'd expect them to be...
All we know is, He's not The Stig... But he is The Stig's Spartan cousin!

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
BoostedEclipseMay-02-09 09:28 PM
Donating 2GNT member
283 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125465, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 1


          

Originally posted by 740 turbo brick
The auto-tragic tranny isnt helping, but you should be doing better than that.


I'm with you. The car should have a little more pull than that. Maybe it is the tranny. I really couldn't tell ya since I've only owned a 5spd, but something don't sound right.

- 98 Eclipse rs turbo

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
420agreenvilleSCMay-02-09 09:51 PM
Donating 2GNT member
1527 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125466, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 3




          

I've experienced both in my car. After the 5 spd swap, there's a world a difference between the two. Its the crap a604 system. It robs performance tremendously from the engine.

___________________________________________



http://www.2gnt.com/quote_db.php?id=278

Outside of Corona: "That sucks, peace out..." (jamie walks away)... "Sweeet, what we doin?" -Zac
Tim's garage (prior to motor install): "Im gonna smoke real quick, that way if you fuck up I am already nicotined up" -Tim

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
ModeratorbullettdsmMay-03-09 03:13 AM
Donating 2GNT member
2676 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125469, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 3


          

Check your cat.

Captain Caveman

96 RS Turbo 11.414 @ 119.62 MSNS, Crower 2 NA cams, BW366, 10.5 comp, UDP, 60mm TB, W/A intercooler, 3.55 tranny 567.9whp 430tq
97 RS NA 13.188 @ 103.87 MSnS powered 12.5 comp, Crower 3's and 219.4whp with 175tq
98 RS DD 12.5 comp on stock ECU, LTH, Crower 2's, Koni, GC, Hypercoil, DG hats
99 OZ 5sp Stocker 15.856 @ 85.97
99 GS stocker auto 17.7@77mph!

wiki home page:http://www.2gnt.com/index.php?d=bullettdsm

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
ModeratortekleinMay-03-09 10:31 AM
Member since Nov 04th 2007
1699 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125472, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 5


          

Originally posted by bullettdsm
Check your cat.


100% agree with Bullet. Im guessing clogged emoji

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
eclipserstturboMay-03-09 03:30 PM
Member since Nov 19th 2008
281 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125479, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 6




          

maybe the tranny is slipping. any auto will feel hella sluggish when its slipping.

I CONTRIBUTED TO THE WIKI!
ah... turbo. I love the turbo, the boost, the speed, the sound.
and its all better when you do it yourself. cheaper too.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
burntheblobsMay-03-09 04:56 PM
Donating 2GNT member
1445 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125481, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 6


          

Originally posted by teklein
Originally posted by bullettdsm Check your cat.
100% agree with Bullet. Im guessing clogged emoji

+1. My older bro's Jeep had a horribly clogged cat and it had trouble accelerating to freeway speeds.



1991 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX - SOLD
2006 Mustang GT Convertible

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
lamrithMay-04-09 06:23 AM
Member since Apr 29th 2009
3 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125491, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 8


          

Whats the best way to check the Cat? I have good Exh flow and steam at idle..?

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
John99RSMay-04-09 07:56 AM
Donating 2GNT member
1191 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125492, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 9


          

Yeah, the auto trans does suck really bad....especially with the AC on. The fact that our cars are really heavy doesn't help either. I really wish Mitsu would have went with a 2.4 instead, like in the Camry and Venza....that engine is super peppy. It's just really hard to get rid of the Eclipse because it looks so damn nice....still looks like the day I bought it 10 years ago. Anyway, my daughter will be a senior in three years and I'm considering giving it to her. With the way teenage girls drive with their lead foot, this car would help keep her speed down..hehe.






http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3130861

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
RoninEclipse2GMay-04-09 05:29 PM
Donating 2GNT member
2745 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125507, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 10
May-04-09 05:35 PM by RoninEclipse2G



          

Originally posted by John99RS
The fact that our cars are really heavy doesn't help either.

?

where are you getting your idea of heavy? 2800/2900lbs is pretty light when you consider most cars nowdays. My wife's Echo is over 3000lbs and my WRX wagon tips the scales at almost 2 tons. A manual RS is only slightly heavier than a 3rd gen RX7 (around 100lbs)

now if you want a light car, the wife's 74 Porsche 914 is light. 1800lbs with fuel. that's light, I can push start that bastard UPHILL

Erik P.
Official 2GNT thread Hijacker
Some say that he's driven over more Covenant than he's shot, and that his grenades aren't where you'd expect them to be...
All we know is, He's not The Stig... But he is The Stig's Spartan cousin!

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
Mike431635May-05-09 06:11 AM
Member since Feb 08th 2009
161 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125510, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 11


          

Originally posted by RoninEclipse2G
Originally posted by John99RS The fact that our cars are really heavy doesn't help either.
? where are you getting your idea of heavy? 2800/2900lbs is pretty light when you consider most cars nowdays. My wife's Echo is over 3000lbs and my WRX wagon tips the scales at almost 2 tons. A manual RS is only slightly heavier than a 3rd gen RX7 (around 100lbs) now if you want a light car, the wife's 74 Porsche 914 is light. 1800lbs with fuel. that's light, I can push start that bastard UPHILL


Not trying to steal the thread, but you have a 914 eh? My gf's dad and I built one, completely stripped it down and restored it, did a ton of upgrades, and put a 2003 Subaru EJ20 turbo engine in it. Owning both a WRX and a 914, I can imagine the grin you're getting right now.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
lamrithMay-05-09 06:35 PM
Member since Apr 29th 2009
3 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125513, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 12


          

Thanks for all the input guys! I will Def look at the cat.

However won't just pulling the cat out and running it be somewhat inaccurate way to test clogged? I mean the cat and muffler will add backpressure to the system, in fact engines NEED some backpressure to run properly and not burn up valves?

I guess my point is I can't think of a single car in the world that would not feel more responsive if you pulled the Catback off, at least in the short term...

That said I will be looking into it as I have seen people with clogged ones and my high miles it makes sense that could be an issue..

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
TuxdreamerxMay-06-09 08:39 AM
Donating 2GNT member
384 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125517, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 11




          

Originally posted by RoninEclipse2G
Originally posted by John99RS The fact that our cars are really heavy doesn't help either.
? where are you getting your idea of heavy? 2800/2900lbs is pretty light when you consider most cars nowdays. My wife's Echo is over 3000lbs and my WRX wagon tips the scales at almost 2 tons. A manual RS is only slightly heavier than a 3rd gen RX7 (around 100lbs) now if you want a light car, the wife's 74 Porsche 914 is light. 1800lbs with fuel. that's light, I can push start that bastard UPHILL


No disrespect and maybe i'm wrong but I looked inside the door jam on my eclipse and it says like 3900lbs?

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
eclipserstturboMay-06-09 09:46 AM
Member since Nov 19th 2008
281 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125518, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 14




          

mine says somethin like 2985 on the title for an esi.

I CONTRIBUTED TO THE WIKI!
ah... turbo. I love the turbo, the boost, the speed, the sound.
and its all better when you do it yourself. cheaper too.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                        
TuxdreamerxMay-06-09 01:47 PM
Donating 2GNT member
384 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125520, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 15




          

Originally posted by eclipserstturbo
mine says somethin like 2985 on the title for an esi.


What does it say in the door? I think it was around 3900lbs GWR.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
John99RSMay-06-09 05:11 PM
Donating 2GNT member
1191 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125521, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 14


          

The inside of my door jam says 3,726lbs.






http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3130861

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                        
ModeratorCorbinMay-07-09 06:31 PM
Donating 2GNT member
2552 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125531, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 17


          

GVW is Gross Vehicle Weight. It is like the maximum load your car can handle, including it's own weight and all passengers/luggage. An auto trans car should weigh 2800-2900 lbs, depending on options. The auto trans sucks all of the life out of the car. You might find that nailing the gas makes the car go slower than if you slowly ease into the gas. The TCU communicates with the ECU to protect the weak transmission. If you break a certain threshold of inputs, the TCU will ask the ECU to reduce the torque output. In the later year cars, you can snip a wire to end the "torque reduction" communication. In my '95, there was no way to end the communication. My only option was to swap in a manual trans. I never looked back.

Corbin
'95 ESI-T

Now with more power and fewer leaks



Humble servant of the Wiki

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
John99RSMay-08-09 02:47 PM
Donating 2GNT member
1191 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125551, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 18


          

I stand corrected on the weight issue....sorry. Thanks for clearing it up Corbin....I just learned something emoji






http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3130861

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
RoninEclipse2GMay-08-09 04:25 PM
Donating 2GNT member
2745 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125552, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 18




          

Originally posted by Corbin
GVW is Gross Vehicle Weight. It is like the maximum load your car can handle, including it's own weight and all passengers/luggage.

exactly. Actual weight and GVW aren't the same.

Erik P.
Official 2GNT thread Hijacker
Some say that he's driven over more Covenant than he's shot, and that his grenades aren't where you'd expect them to be...
All we know is, He's not The Stig... But he is The Stig's Spartan cousin!

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                
Black-OutMay-08-09 11:14 PM
Member since Jan 17th 2009
7 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125554, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 20
May-08-09 11:15 PM by Black-Out



          

My car is a 5-speed and I have to admit it doesn't much like to accelerate until it breaches 4k rpm and my a/c on only makes it worse....these cars are rated at something like 140-145hp if I can remember right so having an auto is gonna make it feel more like 110hp......no fun at all if your used to 200hp or more.

The curb weight is what you really want to know not the GVWM.That weight rating is the combination of the maximum weight each axle set can sustain front to rear. My WRX sedan on the scales weighed in at 3142lbs....the wagon shouldn't weigh much more than 3185lbs (or at least this is what I witnessed when a buddy of mine weighed in after me)

A quick way to check if you have exhaust restriction is to put your hand behind the tail pipe about six inches or so away and feel if there is a considerable amount of pressure coming out. If you don't feel anything or barely anything at all then the next thing I would do is drop the cat out of the system and run it open like someone else suggested earlier and see if it makes a difference in the acceleration.
Just my two cents .....Hope it helps

William

Speed is a way of life........just don't get caught...

Da Ridez
88' Mitsubishi Starion ESI-R
89' Merkur XR4TI
90' Volkswagen Corrado G-60
97' Volvo 850-R
97' Mitsubishi Eclipse GS

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
TuxdreamerxMay-09-09 06:39 PM
Donating 2GNT member
384 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125561, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 18




          

Originally posted by Corbin
GVW is Gross Vehicle Weight. It is like the maximum load your car can handle, including it's own weight and all passengers/luggage. An auto trans car should weigh 2800-2900 lbs, depending on options. The auto trans sucks all of the life out of the car. You might find that nailing the gas makes the car go slower than if you slowly ease into the gas. The TCU communicates with the ECU to protect the weak transmission. If you break a certain threshold of inputs, the TCU will ask the ECU to reduce the torque output. In the later year cars, you can snip a wire to end the "torque reduction" communication. In my '95, there was no way to end the communication. My only option was to swap in a manual trans. I never looked back. Corbin '95 ESI-T Now with more power and fewer leaks Humble servant of the Wiki


That clears up so much. That makes alot of sense now. Thanks!

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
burntheblobsMay-04-09 08:57 AM
Donating 2GNT member
1445 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125494, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 9


          

Originally posted by lamrith
Whats the best way to check the Cat? I have good Exh flow and steam at idle..?

There are two ways.
1. Do an exhaust pressure test.
2. Take your exhaust off before the cat and see if it pulls better.



1991 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX - SOLD
2006 Mustang GT Convertible

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
Mike431635May-04-09 09:12 AM
Member since Feb 08th 2009
161 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125495, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 23


          

+1 on the cat

My manual trans Eclipse was running like absolute crap.. not peppy at all, very very slow in comparison to OTHER slow non-turbo 4-cylinders I've driven. I went through everything you can imagine, new O2 sensors included. Did a compression test and I was over 210 on every cylinder, within 10 psi of each other. However, the ceramic portions of the spark plugs on all cylinders were very corroded looking and yellow. They had gotten very hot from backed up exhaust gasses.

Clogged cat was my culprit; I ended up gutting mine out and the car runs like new. Didn't even throw a CEL (yet.. crossing fingers). Like everyone else, I think this is your issue too.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
CyexmasterMay-04-09 04:04 PM
Member since Nov 27th 2007
324 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125500, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 24




          

I'm with the cat 2. I have a 5 spd and my sister used to have an auto and it didnt suck so bad.... I did have to play a bit with the O/D button to get better result but it was not as slow as your saying yours is. So it may be the cat, get a test pipe you'll love it LOL

Status- Need to do break-in...



Try not to challenge me, I'd rather tie up than lose. Either way you NEVER WIN.... - Me..

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
TheGhostMay-04-09 10:08 PM
Member since Sep 26th 2006
141 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125509, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 25
May-04-09 10:09 PM by TheGhost

          

+1

Check the cat. Your motor maybe trying to inhale with smoke in it's lungs. Easy to check the cat, PB Blaster and Mapp Gas for the rusted bolts, if not a steady hand and a sawz-all. I put a 2 1/4 test pipe on my RS. Breathed a lot better and exhaust temps went down. Although I lost a little on the bottom end I picked up on high way speeds. Just a thought...

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

fullmoonMay-06-09 11:18 AM
Member since Nov 03rd 2005
158 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#125519, "RE: True to 420a form?"
In response to Reply # 0


          

Mines felt kinda like that before I put an intake on. I have an auto and your power usable should kick in at 20 mph.
I got all the bolt on breathing mods on the planet which offsets the slow tranny in the upper range.
I did quite a bit of fwy racing (before I got caught racing myself while listening to Praful! Moon Glide got me a GodDamn Ticket! 85 in a 65 emoji ) just to see what she could do and yea the 420a can hold it's own with the cars built in the 90's.
Compared to other cars of their time (2nd gens Eclipses) they are slightly better than the others so don't give up hope.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine topic #125460 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 2.2
Copyright 1997-2005 DCScripts.com, Copyright 2005-2026 2gnt.com
Generated in 0.077 seconds, executing 68 queries.