Welcome to the 2GNT Forum!
Home Site Background Info & Specs Mods & Tech Info CAPS Part Reviews Donate 2GNT Stickers
Search Printer-friendly copy 2 Users in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine topic #101430
View in linear mode

Subject: "using a 2.0 block on a 2.4 chrysler cirrus reverse swap" Previous topic | Next topic
250lemansOct-17-06 02:53 PM
Member since Jul 11th 2002
257 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#101430, "using a 2.0 block on a 2.4 chrysler cirrus reverse swap"


          

i have a good 2.0 block and my buddy has a chrysler cirrus 2.4 w/ a blown engine
besides the block being 1in shorter and needing some custom motor mounts what else is different
has anyone tried this?

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Replies to this topic

TeamDR1665Oct-18-06 05:47 AM
Donating 2GNT member
14692 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#101434, "RE: using a 2.0 block on a 2.4 chrysler cirrus reverse swap"
In response to Reply # 0


          

I don't know that anyone's tried that, but I think it would be more beneficial to consider swapping the 2GNT head to a 2.4L block in a cloud car. Then you could probably hook up an HRC kit on a Chrysler Cirrus. That could be pimp.

Dunno on the block swap, though. I'd look for a proper 2.4L block before I bothered with this idea...

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Global Ruler Of All ThingsDarkOneOct-18-06 06:39 AM
Donating 2GNT member
14955 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#101439, "RE: using a 2.0 block on a 2.4 chrysler cirrus reverse swap"
In response to Reply # 1




          

True.

I know its been done, but I believe it was done a a breeze, which i think comes with either a 2.0L SOHC or a 2.4L SOHC. They're both cloud cars, so emoji it might be easily doable. I don't know.

______________________________
If a sentence found online has 35% misspellings or greater and includes at least two racially charged expletives, chances are it is a YouTube comment.

'95 Eclipse TurboGS (garage deco)
'95 TSi AWD (restoring a survivor)
'97 Talon ESi-T (poor impulse control)
'99 Eclipse RS-T (daily beater)
'13 Evo X (mostly stock)
'17 Sienna (Middle Aged Dad Mobile)



Factory Service Manuals: http://nawdu.de/files/

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
TeamMichael_97RSOct-18-06 08:55 AM
Donating 2GNT member
5866 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#101443, "RE: using a 2.0 block on a 2.4 chrysler cirrus reverse swap"
In response to Reply # 1


          

Originally posted by DR1665
I don't know that anyone's tried that, but I think it would be more beneficial to consider swapping the 2GNT head to a 2.4L block in a cloud car. Then you could probably hook up an HRC kit on a Chrysler Cirrus. That could be pimp. Dunno on the block swap, though. I'd look for a proper 2.4L block before I bothered with this idea...


If memory serves they just modify the Neon kit and use that.

You could do it... but why? For the price you would probably pay to get it in there you could pick up a boneyard 2.4L, and you'd have less power.

Exile Racing Technologies
http://www.exileracing.com
Go that way, really fast, if something gets in your way... turn.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine topic #101430 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 2.2
Copyright 1997-2005 DCScripts.com, Copyright 2005-2026 2gnt.com
Generated in 0.063 seconds, executing 20 queries.